Cargando…
[(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact
OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency, intensity, and clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG-avidity of axillary lymph nodes after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in patients referred for oncological FDG PET/CT. METHODS: One hundred forty patients referred...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08122-2 |
_version_ | 1783710698077945856 |
---|---|
author | Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Dittli, Manuel Treyer, Valerie Muehlematter, Urs J. Maurer, Alexander Burger, Irene A. Mader, Cäcilia Messerli, Olivia Grünig, Hannes Gebhard, Catherine Huellner, Martin W. Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Berger, Christoph Messerli, Michael |
author_facet | Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Dittli, Manuel Treyer, Valerie Muehlematter, Urs J. Maurer, Alexander Burger, Irene A. Mader, Cäcilia Messerli, Olivia Grünig, Hannes Gebhard, Catherine Huellner, Martin W. Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Berger, Christoph Messerli, Michael |
author_sort | Skawran, Stephan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency, intensity, and clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG-avidity of axillary lymph nodes after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in patients referred for oncological FDG PET/CT. METHODS: One hundred forty patients referred for FDG PET/CT during February and March 2021 after first or second vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna were retrospectively included. FDG-avidity of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes was measured and compared. Assuming no knowledge of prior vaccination, metastatic risk was analyzed by two readers and the clinical impact was evaluated. RESULTS: FDG PET/CT showed FDG-avid lymph nodes ipsilateral to the vaccine injection in 75/140 (54%) patients with a mean SUV(max) of 5.1 (range 2.0 – 17.3). FDG-avid lymph nodes were more frequent in patients vaccinated with Moderna than Pfizer-BioNTech (36/50 [72%] vs. 39/90 [43%] cases, p < 0.001). Metastatic risk of unilateral FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes was rated unlikely in 52/140 (37%), potential in 15/140 (11%), and likely in 8/140 (6%) cases. Clinical management was affected in 17/140 (12%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes are common after COVID-19 vaccination. The avidity of lymph nodes is more frequent in Moderna compared to that in Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines. To avoid relatively frequent clinical dilemmas, we recommend carefully taking the history for prior vaccination in patients undergoing FDG PET/CT and administering the vaccine contralateral to primary cancer. KEY POINTS: • PET/CT showed FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes ipsilateral to the vaccine injection site in 54% of 140 oncological patients after COVID-19 vaccination. • FDG-avid lymphadenopathy was observed significantly more frequently in Moderna compared to patients receiving Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccines. • Patients should be screened for prior COVID-19 vaccination before undergoing PET/CT to enable individually tailored recommendations for clinical management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8217971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82179712021-06-23 [(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Dittli, Manuel Treyer, Valerie Muehlematter, Urs J. Maurer, Alexander Burger, Irene A. Mader, Cäcilia Messerli, Olivia Grünig, Hannes Gebhard, Catherine Huellner, Martin W. Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Berger, Christoph Messerli, Michael Eur Radiol Molecular Imaging OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency, intensity, and clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG-avidity of axillary lymph nodes after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) in patients referred for oncological FDG PET/CT. METHODS: One hundred forty patients referred for FDG PET/CT during February and March 2021 after first or second vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna were retrospectively included. FDG-avidity of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes was measured and compared. Assuming no knowledge of prior vaccination, metastatic risk was analyzed by two readers and the clinical impact was evaluated. RESULTS: FDG PET/CT showed FDG-avid lymph nodes ipsilateral to the vaccine injection in 75/140 (54%) patients with a mean SUV(max) of 5.1 (range 2.0 – 17.3). FDG-avid lymph nodes were more frequent in patients vaccinated with Moderna than Pfizer-BioNTech (36/50 [72%] vs. 39/90 [43%] cases, p < 0.001). Metastatic risk of unilateral FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes was rated unlikely in 52/140 (37%), potential in 15/140 (11%), and likely in 8/140 (6%) cases. Clinical management was affected in 17/140 (12%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes are common after COVID-19 vaccination. The avidity of lymph nodes is more frequent in Moderna compared to that in Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines. To avoid relatively frequent clinical dilemmas, we recommend carefully taking the history for prior vaccination in patients undergoing FDG PET/CT and administering the vaccine contralateral to primary cancer. KEY POINTS: • PET/CT showed FDG-avid axillary lymph nodes ipsilateral to the vaccine injection site in 54% of 140 oncological patients after COVID-19 vaccination. • FDG-avid lymphadenopathy was observed significantly more frequently in Moderna compared to patients receiving Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccines. • Patients should be screened for prior COVID-19 vaccination before undergoing PET/CT to enable individually tailored recommendations for clinical management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8217971/ /pubmed/34156552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08122-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Molecular Imaging Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Dittli, Manuel Treyer, Valerie Muehlematter, Urs J. Maurer, Alexander Burger, Irene A. Mader, Cäcilia Messerli, Olivia Grünig, Hannes Gebhard, Catherine Huellner, Martin W. Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Berger, Christoph Messerli, Michael [(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact |
title | [(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact |
title_full | [(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact |
title_fullStr | [(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact |
title_full_unstemmed | [(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact |
title_short | [(18)F]FDG uptake of axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination in oncological PET/CT: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact |
title_sort | [(18)f]fdg uptake of axillary lymph nodes after covid-19 vaccination in oncological pet/ct: frequency, intensity, and potential clinical impact |
topic | Molecular Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8217971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08122-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skawranstephan 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT gennariantoniog 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT dittlimanuel 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT treyervalerie 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT muehlematterursj 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT maureralexander 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT burgerirenea 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT madercacilia 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT messerliolivia 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT grunighannes 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT gebhardcatherine 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT huellnermartinw 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT curionifontecedroalessandra 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT bergerchristoph 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact AT messerlimichael 18ffdguptakeofaxillarylymphnodesaftercovid19vaccinationinoncologicalpetctfrequencyintensityandpotentialclinicalimpact |