Cargando…

Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”

BACKGROUND: Novel reconstruction algorithms, such as xSPECT Bone, are gaining more and more importance in Nuclear Medicine. With xSPECT Bone, the reconstructed emission image is enhanced by the information obtained in the corresponding CT image. The CT defines tissue classes according to the Hounsfi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lima, Thiago V. M., Bhure, Ujwal, Pérez Lago, Maria de Sol, Thali, Yannick, Matijasevic, Savo, Roos, Justus, Strobel, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-020-00087-7
_version_ 1783710712022958080
author Lima, Thiago V. M.
Bhure, Ujwal
Pérez Lago, Maria de Sol
Thali, Yannick
Matijasevic, Savo
Roos, Justus
Strobel, Klaus
author_facet Lima, Thiago V. M.
Bhure, Ujwal
Pérez Lago, Maria de Sol
Thali, Yannick
Matijasevic, Savo
Roos, Justus
Strobel, Klaus
author_sort Lima, Thiago V. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel reconstruction algorithms, such as xSPECT Bone, are gaining more and more importance in Nuclear Medicine. With xSPECT Bone, the reconstructed emission image is enhanced by the information obtained in the corresponding CT image. The CT defines tissue classes according to the Hounsfield units. In the iterative reconstruction, each tissue class is handled separately in the forward projection step, and all together in the back projection step. As a consequence, xSPECT Bone reconstruction generates images with improved boundary delineation and better anatomic representation of tracer activity. Applying this technique, however, showed that artefacts may occur, when no uptake regions, like metal implants, exhibit fictitious uniform tracer uptake. Due to limitations in spatial resolution in gamma cameras, the xSPECT Bone reconstructed image resulted in spill-out activity from surrounding high uptake region being uniformly distributed over the metal implants. This new technology of xSPECT Bone reconstruction in general enhances the image quality of SPECT/CT; however, the potential introduction of specific artefacts which inadvertently come along with this new technology and their frequency have not yet been addressed in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to identify and characterize these specific metal artefacts (the so-called shining metal artefact) in order to reduce false positives and avoid potentially misdiagnosing loosened or infected implants. CASE PRESENTATION: In this work, we report five cases imaged with bone SPECT/CT of 5 anatomical regions (foot, elbow, spine, shoulder, ribs and knee). All cases demonstrated “shining metal artefacts” in xSPECT Bone reconstruction. CONCLUSION: While xSPECT Bone reconstruction algorithm significantly improves image quality for the diagnosis of bone and joint disorders with SPECT/CT, specific “shining metal artefacts” caused by the xSPECT Bone have to be recognized in order to avoid image misinterpretation suggesting metallic implant loosening or possible infection. The simultaneous analysis of conventionally reconstructed SPECT images (for Siemens the Flash3D reconstruction) helps to avoid misinterpretation of potential artefacts introduced by xSPECT Bone reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8218054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82180542021-06-24 Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact” Lima, Thiago V. M. Bhure, Ujwal Pérez Lago, Maria de Sol Thali, Yannick Matijasevic, Savo Roos, Justus Strobel, Klaus Eur J Hybrid Imaging Case Report BACKGROUND: Novel reconstruction algorithms, such as xSPECT Bone, are gaining more and more importance in Nuclear Medicine. With xSPECT Bone, the reconstructed emission image is enhanced by the information obtained in the corresponding CT image. The CT defines tissue classes according to the Hounsfield units. In the iterative reconstruction, each tissue class is handled separately in the forward projection step, and all together in the back projection step. As a consequence, xSPECT Bone reconstruction generates images with improved boundary delineation and better anatomic representation of tracer activity. Applying this technique, however, showed that artefacts may occur, when no uptake regions, like metal implants, exhibit fictitious uniform tracer uptake. Due to limitations in spatial resolution in gamma cameras, the xSPECT Bone reconstructed image resulted in spill-out activity from surrounding high uptake region being uniformly distributed over the metal implants. This new technology of xSPECT Bone reconstruction in general enhances the image quality of SPECT/CT; however, the potential introduction of specific artefacts which inadvertently come along with this new technology and their frequency have not yet been addressed in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to identify and characterize these specific metal artefacts (the so-called shining metal artefact) in order to reduce false positives and avoid potentially misdiagnosing loosened or infected implants. CASE PRESENTATION: In this work, we report five cases imaged with bone SPECT/CT of 5 anatomical regions (foot, elbow, spine, shoulder, ribs and knee). All cases demonstrated “shining metal artefacts” in xSPECT Bone reconstruction. CONCLUSION: While xSPECT Bone reconstruction algorithm significantly improves image quality for the diagnosis of bone and joint disorders with SPECT/CT, specific “shining metal artefacts” caused by the xSPECT Bone have to be recognized in order to avoid image misinterpretation suggesting metallic implant loosening or possible infection. The simultaneous analysis of conventionally reconstructed SPECT images (for Siemens the Flash3D reconstruction) helps to avoid misinterpretation of potential artefacts introduced by xSPECT Bone reconstruction. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8218054/ /pubmed/34191170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-020-00087-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Case Report
Lima, Thiago V. M.
Bhure, Ujwal
Pérez Lago, Maria de Sol
Thali, Yannick
Matijasevic, Savo
Roos, Justus
Strobel, Klaus
Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”
title Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”
title_full Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”
title_fullStr Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”
title_full_unstemmed Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”
title_short Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”
title_sort impact of metal implants on xspect/ct bone reconstruction: the “shining metal artefact”
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34191170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-020-00087-7
work_keys_str_mv AT limathiagovm impactofmetalimplantsonxspectctbonereconstructiontheshiningmetalartefact
AT bhureujwal impactofmetalimplantsonxspectctbonereconstructiontheshiningmetalartefact
AT perezlagomariadesol impactofmetalimplantsonxspectctbonereconstructiontheshiningmetalartefact
AT thaliyannick impactofmetalimplantsonxspectctbonereconstructiontheshiningmetalartefact
AT matijasevicsavo impactofmetalimplantsonxspectctbonereconstructiontheshiningmetalartefact
AT roosjustus impactofmetalimplantsonxspectctbonereconstructiontheshiningmetalartefact
AT strobelklaus impactofmetalimplantsonxspectctbonereconstructiontheshiningmetalartefact