Cargando…

App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic disease of the pulmonary vasculature that can lead to heart failure and premature death. Assessment of patients with PAH includes performing a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in clinics. We developed a smartphone app to compute the walked dist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salvi, Dario, Poffley, Emma, Tarassenko, Lionel, Orchard, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34096876
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22748
_version_ 1783710729147252736
author Salvi, Dario
Poffley, Emma
Tarassenko, Lionel
Orchard, Elizabeth
author_facet Salvi, Dario
Poffley, Emma
Tarassenko, Lionel
Orchard, Elizabeth
author_sort Salvi, Dario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic disease of the pulmonary vasculature that can lead to heart failure and premature death. Assessment of patients with PAH includes performing a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in clinics. We developed a smartphone app to compute the walked distance (6MWD) indoors, by counting U-turns, and outdoors, by using satellite positioning. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to assess (1) accuracy of the indoor 6MWTs in clinical settings, (2) validity and test-retest reliability of outdoor 6MWTs in the community, (3) compliance, usability, and acceptance of the app, and (4) feasibility of pulse oximetry during 6MWTs. METHODS: We tested the app on 30 PAH patients over 6 months. Patients were asked to perform 3 conventional 6MWTs in clinic while using the app in the indoor mode and one or more app-based 6MWTs in outdoor mode in the community per month. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of 70 pairs of conventional versus app-based indoor 6MWDs suggests that the app is sometimes inaccurate (14.6 m mean difference, lower and upper limit of agreement: –133.35 m to 162.55 m). The comparison of 69 pairs of conventional 6MWDs and community-based outdoor 6MWDs within 7 days shows that community tests are strongly related to those performed in clinic (correlation 0.89), but the interpretation of the distance should consider that differences above the clinically significant threshold are not uncommon. Analysis of 89 pairs of outdoor tests performed by the same patient within 7 days shows that community-based tests are repeatable (intraclass correlation 0.91, standard error of measurement 36.97 m, mean coefficient of variation 12.45%). Questionnaires and semistructured interviews indicate that the app is usable and well accepted, but motivation to use it could be affected if the data are not used for clinical decision, which may explain low compliance in 52% of our cohort. Analysis of pulse oximetry data indicates that conventional pulse oximeters are unreliable if used during a walk. CONCLUSIONS: App-based outdoor 6MWTs in community settings are valid, repeatable, and well accepted by patients. More studies would be needed to assess the benefits of using the app in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04633538; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04633538
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8218218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82182182021-07-02 App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study Salvi, Dario Poffley, Emma Tarassenko, Lionel Orchard, Elizabeth JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic disease of the pulmonary vasculature that can lead to heart failure and premature death. Assessment of patients with PAH includes performing a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in clinics. We developed a smartphone app to compute the walked distance (6MWD) indoors, by counting U-turns, and outdoors, by using satellite positioning. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to assess (1) accuracy of the indoor 6MWTs in clinical settings, (2) validity and test-retest reliability of outdoor 6MWTs in the community, (3) compliance, usability, and acceptance of the app, and (4) feasibility of pulse oximetry during 6MWTs. METHODS: We tested the app on 30 PAH patients over 6 months. Patients were asked to perform 3 conventional 6MWTs in clinic while using the app in the indoor mode and one or more app-based 6MWTs in outdoor mode in the community per month. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis of 70 pairs of conventional versus app-based indoor 6MWDs suggests that the app is sometimes inaccurate (14.6 m mean difference, lower and upper limit of agreement: –133.35 m to 162.55 m). The comparison of 69 pairs of conventional 6MWDs and community-based outdoor 6MWDs within 7 days shows that community tests are strongly related to those performed in clinic (correlation 0.89), but the interpretation of the distance should consider that differences above the clinically significant threshold are not uncommon. Analysis of 89 pairs of outdoor tests performed by the same patient within 7 days shows that community-based tests are repeatable (intraclass correlation 0.91, standard error of measurement 36.97 m, mean coefficient of variation 12.45%). Questionnaires and semistructured interviews indicate that the app is usable and well accepted, but motivation to use it could be affected if the data are not used for clinical decision, which may explain low compliance in 52% of our cohort. Analysis of pulse oximetry data indicates that conventional pulse oximeters are unreliable if used during a walk. CONCLUSIONS: App-based outdoor 6MWTs in community settings are valid, repeatable, and well accepted by patients. More studies would be needed to assess the benefits of using the app in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04633538; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04633538 JMIR Publications 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8218218/ /pubmed/34096876 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22748 Text en ©Dario Salvi, Emma Poffley, Lionel Tarassenko, Elizabeth Orchard. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 07.06.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Salvi, Dario
Poffley, Emma
Tarassenko, Lionel
Orchard, Elizabeth
App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study
title App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study
title_full App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study
title_short App-Based Versus Standard Six-Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study
title_sort app-based versus standard six-minute walk test in pulmonary hypertension: mixed methods study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34096876
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22748
work_keys_str_mv AT salvidario appbasedversusstandardsixminutewalktestinpulmonaryhypertensionmixedmethodsstudy
AT poffleyemma appbasedversusstandardsixminutewalktestinpulmonaryhypertensionmixedmethodsstudy
AT tarassenkolionel appbasedversusstandardsixminutewalktestinpulmonaryhypertensionmixedmethodsstudy
AT orchardelizabeth appbasedversusstandardsixminutewalktestinpulmonaryhypertensionmixedmethodsstudy