Cargando…

SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Small umbilical hernia repair is one of the most common surgical performances in general surgery. Yet, a gold standard procedure for the repair is still lacking today. There is an increasing evidence that mesh could be advantageous compared to suture repair in lowering recurrence rates....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melkemichel, M., Bringman, S., Granåsen, G., Widhe, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05366-7
_version_ 1783710732473335808
author Melkemichel, M.
Bringman, S.
Granåsen, G.
Widhe, B.
author_facet Melkemichel, M.
Bringman, S.
Granåsen, G.
Widhe, B.
author_sort Melkemichel, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small umbilical hernia repair is one of the most common surgical performances in general surgery. Yet, a gold standard procedure for the repair is still lacking today. There is an increasing evidence that mesh could be advantageous compared to suture repair in lowering recurrence rates. An additional important question remains with regard to the optimal anatomical positioning of the mesh. We hypothesize that the use of an onlay mesh in small umbilical hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates without increasing the complications compared to a simple suture repair. METHODS: A prospective, national, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing a standardized 4 × 4 cm onlay mesh to a conventional suture repair will be conducted. A total of 288 patients with a primary elective umbilical hernia ≤ 2 cm from 7 participating Swedish surgical centers will be enrolled. Intraoperative randomization will take place using a centralized web-based system resulting in total allocation concealment. Stratification will be done by surgical site and by defect size. Trial participants and follow-up clinical surgeons will be blinded to the assigned allocation. The primary outcome assessed will be postoperative recurrence at 1 and 3 years. Secondary outcomes assessed will be postoperative complications at 30 days and pain 1 year after surgery. DISCUSSION: Currently, there has been no randomized clinical trial comparing the recurrence rates between an onlay mesh repair and a simple suture repair for small umbilical hernia defects. How to best repair a small umbilical hernia continues to be debated. This trial design should allow for a good assessment of the differences in recurrence rate due to the large sample size and the adequate follow-up. Surgeons’ concerns surrounding optimal anatomical positioning and fear for larger required dissections are understandable. A small onlay mesh may become an easy and safe method of choice to reduce recurrence rates. Guidelines for small umbilical hernia repairs have stressed the need for reliable data to improve treatment recommendations. We can expect that this trial will have a direct implication on small umbilical hernia repair standards. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04231071. Registered on 31 January 2020. SUMMER Trial underwent external peer review as part of the funding process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8218273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82182732021-06-23 SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial Melkemichel, M. Bringman, S. Granåsen, G. Widhe, B. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Small umbilical hernia repair is one of the most common surgical performances in general surgery. Yet, a gold standard procedure for the repair is still lacking today. There is an increasing evidence that mesh could be advantageous compared to suture repair in lowering recurrence rates. An additional important question remains with regard to the optimal anatomical positioning of the mesh. We hypothesize that the use of an onlay mesh in small umbilical hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates without increasing the complications compared to a simple suture repair. METHODS: A prospective, national, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing a standardized 4 × 4 cm onlay mesh to a conventional suture repair will be conducted. A total of 288 patients with a primary elective umbilical hernia ≤ 2 cm from 7 participating Swedish surgical centers will be enrolled. Intraoperative randomization will take place using a centralized web-based system resulting in total allocation concealment. Stratification will be done by surgical site and by defect size. Trial participants and follow-up clinical surgeons will be blinded to the assigned allocation. The primary outcome assessed will be postoperative recurrence at 1 and 3 years. Secondary outcomes assessed will be postoperative complications at 30 days and pain 1 year after surgery. DISCUSSION: Currently, there has been no randomized clinical trial comparing the recurrence rates between an onlay mesh repair and a simple suture repair for small umbilical hernia defects. How to best repair a small umbilical hernia continues to be debated. This trial design should allow for a good assessment of the differences in recurrence rate due to the large sample size and the adequate follow-up. Surgeons’ concerns surrounding optimal anatomical positioning and fear for larger required dissections are understandable. A small onlay mesh may become an easy and safe method of choice to reduce recurrence rates. Guidelines for small umbilical hernia repairs have stressed the need for reliable data to improve treatment recommendations. We can expect that this trial will have a direct implication on small umbilical hernia repair standards. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04231071. Registered on 31 January 2020. SUMMER Trial underwent external peer review as part of the funding process. BioMed Central 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8218273/ /pubmed/34158088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05366-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Melkemichel, M.
Bringman, S.
Granåsen, G.
Widhe, B.
SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial
title SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial
title_full SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial
title_fullStr SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial
title_short SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial
title_sort summer trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults—a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05366-7
work_keys_str_mv AT melkemichelm summertrialmeshversussuturerepairinsmallumbilicalherniasinadultsastudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindmulticenterclinicaltrial
AT bringmans summertrialmeshversussuturerepairinsmallumbilicalherniasinadultsastudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindmulticenterclinicaltrial
AT granaseng summertrialmeshversussuturerepairinsmallumbilicalherniasinadultsastudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindmulticenterclinicaltrial
AT widheb summertrialmeshversussuturerepairinsmallumbilicalherniasinadultsastudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindmulticenterclinicaltrial