Cargando…

Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives

BACKGROUND: Currently, the technologies most commonly used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer are radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, and irreversible (IRE) or reversible electroporation combined with low doses of chemotherapeutic drugs. AIM: To report an overview and updates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granata, Vincenza, Grassi, Roberta, Fusco, Roberta, Belli, Andrea, Palaia, Raffaele, Carrafiello, Gianpaolo, Miele, Vittorio, Grassi, Roberto, Petrillo, Antonella, Izzo, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i23.3413
_version_ 1783710749490675712
author Granata, Vincenza
Grassi, Roberta
Fusco, Roberta
Belli, Andrea
Palaia, Raffaele
Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
Miele, Vittorio
Grassi, Roberto
Petrillo, Antonella
Izzo, Francesco
author_facet Granata, Vincenza
Grassi, Roberta
Fusco, Roberta
Belli, Andrea
Palaia, Raffaele
Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
Miele, Vittorio
Grassi, Roberto
Petrillo, Antonella
Izzo, Francesco
author_sort Granata, Vincenza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, the technologies most commonly used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer are radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, and irreversible (IRE) or reversible electroporation combined with low doses of chemotherapeutic drugs. AIM: To report an overview and updates on ablative techniques in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched. The search covered the years from January 2000 to January 2021. Moreover, the reference lists of the found papers were analysed for papers not indexed in the electronic databases. All titles and abstracts were analysed. RESULTS: We found 30 studies (14 studies for RFA, 3 for microwave therapy, 10 for IRE, and 3 for electrochemotherapy), comprising 1047 patients, which were analysed further. Two randomized trials were found for IRE. Percutaneous and laparotomy approaches were performed. In the assessed patients, the median maximal diameter of the lesions was in the range of 2.8 to 4.5 cm. All series included patients unfit for surgical treatment, but Martin et al assessed a subgroup of patients with borderline resectable tumours who underwent resection with margin attenuation with IRE. Most studies administered chemotherapy prior to ablative therapies. However, several studies suggest that the key determinant of improved survival is attributable to ablative treatment alone. Nevertheless, the authors suggested chemotherapy before local therapies for several reasons. This strategy may not only downstage a subgroup of patients to curative-intent surgery but also support to recognize patients with biologically unfavourable tumours who would likely not benefit from ablation treatments. Ablation therapies seem safe based on the 1047 patients assessed in this review. The mortality rate ranged from 1.8% to 2%. However, despite the low mortality, the reported rates of severe post procedural complications ranged from 0%-42%. Most reported complications have been self-limiting and manageable. Median overall survival varied between 6.0 and 33 mo. Regarding the technical success rate, assessed papers reported an estimated rate in the range of 85% to 100%. However, the authors reported early recurrence after treatment. A distinct consideration should be made on whether local treatments induce an immune response in the ablated area. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that RFA is a promising mechanism for inducing antigen-presenting cell infiltration and enhancing the systemic antitumour T-cell immune response and tumour regression. CONCLUSION: In the management of patients with pancreatic cancer, the possibility of a multimodal approach should be considered, and conceptually, the combination of RFA with immunotherapy represents a novel angle of attack against this tumour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8218359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82183592021-06-22 Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives Granata, Vincenza Grassi, Roberta Fusco, Roberta Belli, Andrea Palaia, Raffaele Carrafiello, Gianpaolo Miele, Vittorio Grassi, Roberto Petrillo, Antonella Izzo, Francesco World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Currently, the technologies most commonly used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer are radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, and irreversible (IRE) or reversible electroporation combined with low doses of chemotherapeutic drugs. AIM: To report an overview and updates on ablative techniques in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Several electronic databases were searched. The search covered the years from January 2000 to January 2021. Moreover, the reference lists of the found papers were analysed for papers not indexed in the electronic databases. All titles and abstracts were analysed. RESULTS: We found 30 studies (14 studies for RFA, 3 for microwave therapy, 10 for IRE, and 3 for electrochemotherapy), comprising 1047 patients, which were analysed further. Two randomized trials were found for IRE. Percutaneous and laparotomy approaches were performed. In the assessed patients, the median maximal diameter of the lesions was in the range of 2.8 to 4.5 cm. All series included patients unfit for surgical treatment, but Martin et al assessed a subgroup of patients with borderline resectable tumours who underwent resection with margin attenuation with IRE. Most studies administered chemotherapy prior to ablative therapies. However, several studies suggest that the key determinant of improved survival is attributable to ablative treatment alone. Nevertheless, the authors suggested chemotherapy before local therapies for several reasons. This strategy may not only downstage a subgroup of patients to curative-intent surgery but also support to recognize patients with biologically unfavourable tumours who would likely not benefit from ablation treatments. Ablation therapies seem safe based on the 1047 patients assessed in this review. The mortality rate ranged from 1.8% to 2%. However, despite the low mortality, the reported rates of severe post procedural complications ranged from 0%-42%. Most reported complications have been self-limiting and manageable. Median overall survival varied between 6.0 and 33 mo. Regarding the technical success rate, assessed papers reported an estimated rate in the range of 85% to 100%. However, the authors reported early recurrence after treatment. A distinct consideration should be made on whether local treatments induce an immune response in the ablated area. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that RFA is a promising mechanism for inducing antigen-presenting cell infiltration and enhancing the systemic antitumour T-cell immune response and tumour regression. CONCLUSION: In the management of patients with pancreatic cancer, the possibility of a multimodal approach should be considered, and conceptually, the combination of RFA with immunotherapy represents a novel angle of attack against this tumour. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-06-21 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8218359/ /pubmed/34163121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i23.3413 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Granata, Vincenza
Grassi, Roberta
Fusco, Roberta
Belli, Andrea
Palaia, Raffaele
Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
Miele, Vittorio
Grassi, Roberto
Petrillo, Antonella
Izzo, Francesco
Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives
title Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives
title_full Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives
title_fullStr Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives
title_short Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives
title_sort local ablation of pancreatic tumors: state of the art and future perspectives
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i23.3413
work_keys_str_mv AT granatavincenza localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT grassiroberta localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT fuscoroberta localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT belliandrea localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT palaiaraffaele localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT carrafiellogianpaolo localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT mielevittorio localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT grassiroberto localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT petrilloantonella localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives
AT izzofrancesco localablationofpancreatictumorsstateoftheartandfutureperspectives