Cargando…

Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience

BACKGROUND: Implementation facilitators enable healthcare staff to effectively implement change, yet little is known about their affective (e.g., emotional, mental, physical) experiences of facilitation. We propose an expansion to the Integrated Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (i-PAR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya T., Ganz, David A., Barnard, Jenny M., Penney, Lauren, Finley, Erin P., Hamilton, Alison B., Chawla, Neetu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00171-4
_version_ 1783710765407010816
author Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya T.
Ganz, David A.
Barnard, Jenny M.
Penney, Lauren
Finley, Erin P.
Hamilton, Alison B.
Chawla, Neetu
author_facet Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya T.
Ganz, David A.
Barnard, Jenny M.
Penney, Lauren
Finley, Erin P.
Hamilton, Alison B.
Chawla, Neetu
author_sort Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation facilitators enable healthcare staff to effectively implement change, yet little is known about their affective (e.g., emotional, mental, physical) experiences of facilitation. We propose an expansion to the Integrated Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework that introduces facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience to better assess facilitators’ affective experiences. METHODS: We used an instrumental case study and facilitator data (logged reflections and debrief session notes) from the Coordination Toolkit and Coaching initiative to conceptualize facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience and to better understand the psychological impact of the facilitation process on facilitator effectiveness and implementation success. RESULTS: We define facilitation intensity as both the quantitative and/or qualitative measure of the volume of tasks and activities needed to engage and motivate recipients in implementation, and the psychological impact on the facilitator of conducting facilitation tasks and activities. We define facilitator resilience as the ability to cope with and adapt to the complexities of facilitation in order to effectively engage and motivate staff, while nurturing and sustaining hope, self-efficacy, and adaptive coping behaviors in oneself. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators’ affective experience may help to identify potential relationships between the facilitation factors we propose (facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience). Future studies should test ways of reliably measuring facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience and specify their relationships in greater detail. By supporting facilitator resilience, healthcare delivery systems may help sustain the skilled facilitator workforce necessary for continued practice improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03063294) on February 24, 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8218441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82184412021-06-23 Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya T. Ganz, David A. Barnard, Jenny M. Penney, Lauren Finley, Erin P. Hamilton, Alison B. Chawla, Neetu Implement Sci Commun Methodology BACKGROUND: Implementation facilitators enable healthcare staff to effectively implement change, yet little is known about their affective (e.g., emotional, mental, physical) experiences of facilitation. We propose an expansion to the Integrated Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework that introduces facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience to better assess facilitators’ affective experiences. METHODS: We used an instrumental case study and facilitator data (logged reflections and debrief session notes) from the Coordination Toolkit and Coaching initiative to conceptualize facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience and to better understand the psychological impact of the facilitation process on facilitator effectiveness and implementation success. RESULTS: We define facilitation intensity as both the quantitative and/or qualitative measure of the volume of tasks and activities needed to engage and motivate recipients in implementation, and the psychological impact on the facilitator of conducting facilitation tasks and activities. We define facilitator resilience as the ability to cope with and adapt to the complexities of facilitation in order to effectively engage and motivate staff, while nurturing and sustaining hope, self-efficacy, and adaptive coping behaviors in oneself. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitators’ affective experience may help to identify potential relationships between the facilitation factors we propose (facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience). Future studies should test ways of reliably measuring facilitation intensity and facilitator resilience and specify their relationships in greater detail. By supporting facilitator resilience, healthcare delivery systems may help sustain the skilled facilitator workforce necessary for continued practice improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The project was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03063294) on February 24, 2017. BioMed Central 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8218441/ /pubmed/34154670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00171-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya T.
Ganz, David A.
Barnard, Jenny M.
Penney, Lauren
Finley, Erin P.
Hamilton, Alison B.
Chawla, Neetu
Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience
title Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience
title_full Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience
title_fullStr Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience
title_full_unstemmed Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience
title_short Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience
title_sort sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00171-4
work_keys_str_mv AT olmosochoatanyat sustainingimplementationfacilitationamodelforfacilitatorresilience
AT ganzdavida sustainingimplementationfacilitationamodelforfacilitatorresilience
AT barnardjennym sustainingimplementationfacilitationamodelforfacilitatorresilience
AT penneylauren sustainingimplementationfacilitationamodelforfacilitatorresilience
AT finleyerinp sustainingimplementationfacilitationamodelforfacilitatorresilience
AT hamiltonalisonb sustainingimplementationfacilitationamodelforfacilitatorresilience
AT chawlaneetu sustainingimplementationfacilitationamodelforfacilitatorresilience