Cargando…

Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro

BACKGROUND: Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, previous studies had reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration. The purposes of this study were to (1) quantitatively evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teng, Yuanjun, Zhang, Xiaohui, Da, Lijun, Hu, Jie, Wang, Hong, Han, Hua, Wu, Meng, Zhang, Shifeng, Xia, Yayi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04457-5
_version_ 1783710774757163008
author Teng, Yuanjun
Zhang, Xiaohui
Da, Lijun
Hu, Jie
Wang, Hong
Han, Hua
Wu, Meng
Zhang, Shifeng
Xia, Yayi
author_facet Teng, Yuanjun
Zhang, Xiaohui
Da, Lijun
Hu, Jie
Wang, Hong
Han, Hua
Wu, Meng
Zhang, Shifeng
Xia, Yayi
author_sort Teng, Yuanjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, previous studies had reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration. The purposes of this study were to (1) quantitatively evaluate the graft laceration from one single insertion of PEEK interference screws; and (2) determine whether different types of sutures reduced the graft laceration after one single insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction. METHODS: The in-vitro ACL reconstruction model was created using porcine tibias and bovine extensor digitorum tendons of bovine hind limbs. The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interference screws were used for tibial fixation. This study was divided into five groups (n = 10 in each group): the non-fixed group, the non-sutured group, the absorbable suture group, the Ethibond suture group and the UHMWPE suture group. Biomechanical tests were performed using the mode of pull-to-failure loading tests at 10 mm/min. Tensile stiffness (newtons per millimeter), energy absorbed to failure (in joules) and ultimate load (newtons) were recorded for analysis. RESULTS: All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre-tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups (P > 0.05). The biomechanical tests demonstrated that PEEK interference screws significantly caused the graft laceration (P < 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our biomechanical study suggested that the ultimate failure load of grafts was reduced of approximately 25 % after one single insertion of a PEEK interference screw in ACL reconstruction. Suturing the ends of the grafts using different sutures (absorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not decrease the graft laceration caused by interference screws.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8218482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82184822021-06-23 Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro Teng, Yuanjun Zhang, Xiaohui Da, Lijun Hu, Jie Wang, Hong Han, Hua Wu, Meng Zhang, Shifeng Xia, Yayi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, previous studies had reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration. The purposes of this study were to (1) quantitatively evaluate the graft laceration from one single insertion of PEEK interference screws; and (2) determine whether different types of sutures reduced the graft laceration after one single insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction. METHODS: The in-vitro ACL reconstruction model was created using porcine tibias and bovine extensor digitorum tendons of bovine hind limbs. The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interference screws were used for tibial fixation. This study was divided into five groups (n = 10 in each group): the non-fixed group, the non-sutured group, the absorbable suture group, the Ethibond suture group and the UHMWPE suture group. Biomechanical tests were performed using the mode of pull-to-failure loading tests at 10 mm/min. Tensile stiffness (newtons per millimeter), energy absorbed to failure (in joules) and ultimate load (newtons) were recorded for analysis. RESULTS: All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre-tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups (P > 0.05). The biomechanical tests demonstrated that PEEK interference screws significantly caused the graft laceration (P < 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our biomechanical study suggested that the ultimate failure load of grafts was reduced of approximately 25 % after one single insertion of a PEEK interference screw in ACL reconstruction. Suturing the ends of the grafts using different sutures (absorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not decrease the graft laceration caused by interference screws. BioMed Central 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8218482/ /pubmed/34158018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04457-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Teng, Yuanjun
Zhang, Xiaohui
Da, Lijun
Hu, Jie
Wang, Hong
Han, Hua
Wu, Meng
Zhang, Shifeng
Xia, Yayi
Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
title Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
title_full Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
title_fullStr Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
title_short Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro
title_sort whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? a biomechanical study in vitro
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04457-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tengyuanjun whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT zhangxiaohui whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT dalijun whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT hujie whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT wanghong whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT hanhua whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT wumeng whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT zhangshifeng whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro
AT xiayayi whethersuturesreducethegraftlacerationcausedbyinterferencescrewinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinvitro