Cargando…
The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
BACKGROUND: While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwy049 |
_version_ | 1783710785671790592 |
---|---|
author | Falk, Vanessa Kenshil, Sana Sandha, Simrat Teshima, Christopher D’Souza, Pernilla Sandha, Gurpal |
author_facet | Falk, Vanessa Kenshil, Sana Sandha, Simrat Teshima, Christopher D’Souza, Pernilla Sandha, Gurpal |
author_sort | Falk, Vanessa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). This study compares clinical attributes of DPPS, FCSEMS and LAMS. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective review of EUS-TD for PFCs. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, hospital length of stay (HLOS), number of endoscopies, need for necrosectomy, adverse events (AEs) and overall cost. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (37 male, average age 49 years) underwent a total of 60 EUS-TD procedures for PFCs (average size 11.2 cm with 29 pseudocysts and 29 walled-off necrosis). Ten patients (17%) underwent EUS-TD with DPPS and 48 patients (83%) with metal stents (32 FCSEMS, 16 LAMS). Overall technical and clinical success was 100% and 84%, respectively. Lumen-apposing metal stents had shorter procedure times (14.9 versus 63.6 DPPS, 39.1 min FCSEMS, P < 0.001), and no difference in AEs (3 of 16 versus 4 of 10 DPPS, 12 of 34 FCSEMS, ns). Double-pigtail plastic stents required more endoscopies (3.7 versus 2.3 LAMS, 2.3 FCSEMS, P = 0.013) and necrosectomies (4 of 10 [40%]) compared with 5 of 34 [15%] in the FCSEMS group and 3 of 16 [19%] in the LAMS group, respectively, P = 0.001) to achieve clinical resolution. The overall cost and HLOS was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of LAMS for PFCs is not associated with any significant increase in cost despite technical (shorter procedure time) and clinical advantages (shorter indwell time, reduced need for necrosectomy and no increase in AEs). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8218535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82185352021-06-23 The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Falk, Vanessa Kenshil, Sana Sandha, Simrat Teshima, Christopher D’Souza, Pernilla Sandha, Gurpal J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Original Articles BACKGROUND: While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). This study compares clinical attributes of DPPS, FCSEMS and LAMS. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective review of EUS-TD for PFCs. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, hospital length of stay (HLOS), number of endoscopies, need for necrosectomy, adverse events (AEs) and overall cost. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (37 male, average age 49 years) underwent a total of 60 EUS-TD procedures for PFCs (average size 11.2 cm with 29 pseudocysts and 29 walled-off necrosis). Ten patients (17%) underwent EUS-TD with DPPS and 48 patients (83%) with metal stents (32 FCSEMS, 16 LAMS). Overall technical and clinical success was 100% and 84%, respectively. Lumen-apposing metal stents had shorter procedure times (14.9 versus 63.6 DPPS, 39.1 min FCSEMS, P < 0.001), and no difference in AEs (3 of 16 versus 4 of 10 DPPS, 12 of 34 FCSEMS, ns). Double-pigtail plastic stents required more endoscopies (3.7 versus 2.3 LAMS, 2.3 FCSEMS, P = 0.013) and necrosectomies (4 of 10 [40%]) compared with 5 of 34 [15%] in the FCSEMS group and 3 of 16 [19%] in the LAMS group, respectively, P = 0.001) to achieve clinical resolution. The overall cost and HLOS was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of LAMS for PFCs is not associated with any significant increase in cost despite technical (shorter procedure time) and clinical advantages (shorter indwell time, reduced need for necrosectomy and no increase in AEs). Oxford University Press 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8218535/ /pubmed/34169224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwy049 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Falk, Vanessa Kenshil, Sana Sandha, Simrat Teshima, Christopher D’Souza, Pernilla Sandha, Gurpal The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents |
title | The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents |
title_full | The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents |
title_fullStr | The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents |
title_full_unstemmed | The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents |
title_short | The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents |
title_sort | evolution of eus-guided transluminal drainage for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: a comparison of clinical and cost outcomes with double-pigtail plastic stents, conventional metal stents and lumen-apposing metal stents |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwy049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT falkvanessa theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT kenshilsana theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT sandhasimrat theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT teshimachristopher theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT dsouzapernilla theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT sandhagurpal theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT falkvanessa evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT kenshilsana evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT sandhasimrat evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT teshimachristopher evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT dsouzapernilla evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents AT sandhagurpal evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents |