Cargando…

The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents

BACKGROUND: While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falk, Vanessa, Kenshil, Sana, Sandha, Simrat, Teshima, Christopher, D’Souza, Pernilla, Sandha, Gurpal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwy049
_version_ 1783710785671790592
author Falk, Vanessa
Kenshil, Sana
Sandha, Simrat
Teshima, Christopher
D’Souza, Pernilla
Sandha, Gurpal
author_facet Falk, Vanessa
Kenshil, Sana
Sandha, Simrat
Teshima, Christopher
D’Souza, Pernilla
Sandha, Gurpal
author_sort Falk, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). This study compares clinical attributes of DPPS, FCSEMS and LAMS. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective review of EUS-TD for PFCs. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, hospital length of stay (HLOS), number of endoscopies, need for necrosectomy, adverse events (AEs) and overall cost. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (37 male, average age 49 years) underwent a total of 60 EUS-TD procedures for PFCs (average size 11.2 cm with 29 pseudocysts and 29 walled-off necrosis). Ten patients (17%) underwent EUS-TD with DPPS and 48 patients (83%) with metal stents (32 FCSEMS, 16 LAMS). Overall technical and clinical success was 100% and 84%, respectively. Lumen-apposing metal stents had shorter procedure times (14.9 versus 63.6 DPPS, 39.1 min FCSEMS, P < 0.001), and no difference in AEs (3 of 16 versus 4 of 10 DPPS, 12 of 34 FCSEMS, ns). Double-pigtail plastic stents required more endoscopies (3.7 versus 2.3 LAMS, 2.3 FCSEMS, P = 0.013) and necrosectomies (4 of 10 [40%]) compared with 5 of 34 [15%] in the FCSEMS group and 3 of 16 [19%] in the LAMS group, respectively, P = 0.001) to achieve clinical resolution. The overall cost and HLOS was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of LAMS for PFCs is not associated with any significant increase in cost despite technical (shorter procedure time) and clinical advantages (shorter indwell time, reduced need for necrosectomy and no increase in AEs).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8218535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82185352021-06-23 The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Falk, Vanessa Kenshil, Sana Sandha, Simrat Teshima, Christopher D’Souza, Pernilla Sandha, Gurpal J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Original Articles BACKGROUND: While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). This study compares clinical attributes of DPPS, FCSEMS and LAMS. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective review of EUS-TD for PFCs. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, hospital length of stay (HLOS), number of endoscopies, need for necrosectomy, adverse events (AEs) and overall cost. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (37 male, average age 49 years) underwent a total of 60 EUS-TD procedures for PFCs (average size 11.2 cm with 29 pseudocysts and 29 walled-off necrosis). Ten patients (17%) underwent EUS-TD with DPPS and 48 patients (83%) with metal stents (32 FCSEMS, 16 LAMS). Overall technical and clinical success was 100% and 84%, respectively. Lumen-apposing metal stents had shorter procedure times (14.9 versus 63.6 DPPS, 39.1 min FCSEMS, P < 0.001), and no difference in AEs (3 of 16 versus 4 of 10 DPPS, 12 of 34 FCSEMS, ns). Double-pigtail plastic stents required more endoscopies (3.7 versus 2.3 LAMS, 2.3 FCSEMS, P = 0.013) and necrosectomies (4 of 10 [40%]) compared with 5 of 34 [15%] in the FCSEMS group and 3 of 16 [19%] in the LAMS group, respectively, P = 0.001) to achieve clinical resolution. The overall cost and HLOS was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of LAMS for PFCs is not associated with any significant increase in cost despite technical (shorter procedure time) and clinical advantages (shorter indwell time, reduced need for necrosectomy and no increase in AEs). Oxford University Press 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8218535/ /pubmed/34169224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwy049 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Falk, Vanessa
Kenshil, Sana
Sandha, Simrat
Teshima, Christopher
D’Souza, Pernilla
Sandha, Gurpal
The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
title The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
title_full The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
title_fullStr The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
title_short The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
title_sort evolution of eus-guided transluminal drainage for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: a comparison of clinical and cost outcomes with double-pigtail plastic stents, conventional metal stents and lumen-apposing metal stents
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwy049
work_keys_str_mv AT falkvanessa theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT kenshilsana theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT sandhasimrat theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT teshimachristopher theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT dsouzapernilla theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT sandhagurpal theevolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT falkvanessa evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT kenshilsana evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT sandhasimrat evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT teshimachristopher evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT dsouzapernilla evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents
AT sandhagurpal evolutionofeusguidedtransluminaldrainageforthetreatmentofpancreaticfluidcollectionsacomparisonofclinicalandcostoutcomeswithdoublepigtailplasticstentsconventionalmetalstentsandlumenapposingmetalstents