Cargando…

Mid- and Long-Term Efficacy of Surgical Treatment of L1–2 Vertebral Tuberculosis with Subdiaphragmatic Extraperitoneal Approach

BACKGROUND: The L1–2 vertebral segment is the most common site of spinal tuberculosis. Traditional thoracoabdominal surgery in this segment risks trauma and complications. This study analyzed the surgical efficacy of the subdiaphragmatic extraperitoneal approach in the treatment of L1–2 spinal tuber...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Fubiao, Wang, Qian, Liu, Liehua, Han, Shuanqiang, Jin, Weidong, Wang, Zili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8218605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135300
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.932284
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The L1–2 vertebral segment is the most common site of spinal tuberculosis. Traditional thoracoabdominal surgery in this segment risks trauma and complications. This study analyzed the surgical efficacy of the subdiaphragmatic extraperitoneal approach in the treatment of L1–2 spinal tuberculosis. MATERIAL/METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 67 patients with L1–2 vertebral tuberculosis who underwent posterior internal fixation was performed: 35 patients underwent the subdiaphragmatic extraperitoneal approach (group A) and 32 underwent the thoracoabdominal approach (group B). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative nerve function recovery, deformity correction, bone graft fusion, lesion healing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and complications were observed. RESULTS: In group A and group B, intraoperative blood loss was 712.00±64.66 mL and 1104.38±131.34 mL; average operation time was 3.16±0.67 h and 5.16±1.07 h; and postoperative hospital stay was 9.60±2.64 days and 13.69±3.87 days, respectively. At 6 months and 5 years after surgery, neurological function, visual analog scale score, and Cobb angle of all patients were significantly improved compared with those before surgery; ESR and CRP decreased to normal levels; lesions completely cured; and all patients had good bone graft fusion. Pulmonary complications occurred in 2 patients in group A and in 14 patients in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of subdiaphragmatic extraperitoneal approach was similar to that of the thoracoabdominal approach for L1–2 spinal tuberculosis, but the former has the advantages of less surgical trauma, shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, and fewer postoperative pulmonary complications.