Life cycle assessment during packaging of market-sized seabass and meagre: necessary adaptations toward GHG neutrality

PURPOSE: Fish is a delicate and valuable source of protein, and aquaculture is expected to provide the required amount of fish needed at reasonable prices. Packaging is a vital stage to preserve hygiene, quality and freshness of aquaculture products. The purpose of this study was to identify environmental hotspots in farmed seabass and meagre during the packaging stage and to examine scenarios for reducing environmental impacts, aiming at greenhouse gas neutrality. METHODS: The life cycle assessment method was applied for the first time at three packaging plants of farmed seabass and meagre in western Greece, in order to assess their environmental impacts, taking into account the amount of electricity, expanded polystyrene, and other plastic and packaging materials needed. Moreover, different scenarios were designed involving the energy mix/alternative sources, recycling and reuse of packaging materials, and the replacement of standard polystyrene boxes and wooden pallets, in order to suggest environmentally friendly improvements in the packaging process. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Conventional operation of seabass and meagre packaging plants requires significant amounts of energy and packaging materials. In fact, electricity, boxes and pallets were documented as the main contributors to most of the environmental impact indicators. Seabass packaging had a slightly lower overall environmental impact compared to meagre, due to its smaller market size. Impact minimization scenarios resulted in various degrees of reduction of environmental burdens in both species; however, near-zero GHG emissions were achieved when energy from photovoltaic panels and recycling/reuse of packaging materials were combined with the use of non-fossil-based boxes and recyclable pallets. Such readily applicable adjustments to the conventional operation of packaging plants would contribute to overall environmental sustainability and to better consumer acceptability of the final product. CONCLUSIONS: In a nutshell, the life cycle assessment method proved to be a valuable tool for assessing the environmental performance of Mediterranean aquaculture packaging processes. Moreover, it served to identify critical factors directly related to the EU GHG neutrality target. Accordingly, environmentally friendly decision-making/strategic management in the farmed fish packaging sector will inevitably rely on alternative energy sources, recycling of packaging materials, and use of recyclable corrugated board boxes or similar non-fossil-based materials.