Cargando…

Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review

BACKGROUND: the aim of this review was to analyze the implementation and impact of remote home monitoring models (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients, identifying their main components, processes of implementation, target patient populations, impact on outcomes, costs and les...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia, Singh, Kelly E, Sidhu, Manbinder S, Georghiou, Theo, Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris, Tomini, Sonila M, Inada-Kim, Matthew, Kirkham, Karen, Streetly, Allison, Cohen, Nathan, Fulop, Naomi J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100965
_version_ 1783710919661977600
author Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Singh, Kelly E
Sidhu, Manbinder S
Georghiou, Theo
Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris
Tomini, Sonila M
Inada-Kim, Matthew
Kirkham, Karen
Streetly, Allison
Cohen, Nathan
Fulop, Naomi J
author_facet Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Singh, Kelly E
Sidhu, Manbinder S
Georghiou, Theo
Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris
Tomini, Sonila M
Inada-Kim, Matthew
Kirkham, Karen
Streetly, Allison
Cohen, Nathan
Fulop, Naomi J
author_sort Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: the aim of this review was to analyze the implementation and impact of remote home monitoring models (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients, identifying their main components, processes of implementation, target patient populations, impact on outcomes, costs and lessons learnt. METHODS: we carried out a rapid systematic review on models led by primary and secondary care across seven countries (US, Australia, Canada, The Netherlands, Ireland, China, UK). The main outcomes included in the review were: impact of remote home monitoring on virtual length of stay, escalation, emergency department attendance/reattendance, admission/readmission and mortality. The search was updated on February 2021. We used the PRISMA statement and the review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD: 42020202888). FINDINGS: the review included 27 articles. The aim of the models was to maintain patients safe in the appropriate setting. Most models were led by secondary care and confirmation of COVID-19 was not required (in most cases). Monitoring was carried via online platforms, paper-based systems with telephone calls or (less frequently) through wearable sensors. Models based on phone calls were considered more inclusive. Patient/career training was identified as a determining factor of success. We could not reach substantive conclusions regarding patient safety and the identification of early deterioration due to lack of standardized reporting and missing data. Economic analysis was not reported for most of the models and did not go beyond reporting resources used and the amount spent per patient monitored. INTERPRETATION: future research should focus on staff and patient experiences of care and inequalities in patients’ access to care. Attention needs to be paid to the cost-effectiveness of the models and their sustainability, evaluation of their impact on patient outcomes by using comparators, and the use of risk-stratification tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8219406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82194062021-06-23 Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Singh, Kelly E Sidhu, Manbinder S Georghiou, Theo Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris Tomini, Sonila M Inada-Kim, Matthew Kirkham, Karen Streetly, Allison Cohen, Nathan Fulop, Naomi J EClinicalMedicine Review BACKGROUND: the aim of this review was to analyze the implementation and impact of remote home monitoring models (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients, identifying their main components, processes of implementation, target patient populations, impact on outcomes, costs and lessons learnt. METHODS: we carried out a rapid systematic review on models led by primary and secondary care across seven countries (US, Australia, Canada, The Netherlands, Ireland, China, UK). The main outcomes included in the review were: impact of remote home monitoring on virtual length of stay, escalation, emergency department attendance/reattendance, admission/readmission and mortality. The search was updated on February 2021. We used the PRISMA statement and the review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD: 42020202888). FINDINGS: the review included 27 articles. The aim of the models was to maintain patients safe in the appropriate setting. Most models were led by secondary care and confirmation of COVID-19 was not required (in most cases). Monitoring was carried via online platforms, paper-based systems with telephone calls or (less frequently) through wearable sensors. Models based on phone calls were considered more inclusive. Patient/career training was identified as a determining factor of success. We could not reach substantive conclusions regarding patient safety and the identification of early deterioration due to lack of standardized reporting and missing data. Economic analysis was not reported for most of the models and did not go beyond reporting resources used and the amount spent per patient monitored. INTERPRETATION: future research should focus on staff and patient experiences of care and inequalities in patients’ access to care. Attention needs to be paid to the cost-effectiveness of the models and their sustainability, evaluation of their impact on patient outcomes by using comparators, and the use of risk-stratification tools. Elsevier 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8219406/ /pubmed/34179736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100965 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Singh, Kelly E
Sidhu, Manbinder S
Georghiou, Theo
Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris
Tomini, Sonila M
Inada-Kim, Matthew
Kirkham, Karen
Streetly, Allison
Cohen, Nathan
Fulop, Naomi J
Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review
title Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review
title_full Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review
title_fullStr Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review
title_short Remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients: a rapid systematic review
title_sort remote home monitoring (virtual wards) for confirmed or suspected covid-19 patients: a rapid systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100965
work_keys_str_mv AT vindrolapadroscecilia remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT singhkellye remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT sidhumanbinders remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT georghioutheo remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT sherlawjohnsonchris remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT tominisonilam remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT inadakimmatthew remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT kirkhamkaren remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT streetlyallison remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT cohennathan remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview
AT fulopnaomij remotehomemonitoringvirtualwardsforconfirmedorsuspectedcovid19patientsarapidsystematicreview