Cargando…
Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science
Mouse cursor tracking has become a prominent method for characterizing cognitive processes, used in a wide variety of domains of psychological science. Researchers have demonstrated considerable ingenuity in the application of the approach, but the methodology has not undergone systematic analysis t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01851-3 |
_version_ | 1783710958703607808 |
---|---|
author | Schoemann, Martin O’Hora, Denis Dale, Rick Scherbaum, Stefan |
author_facet | Schoemann, Martin O’Hora, Denis Dale, Rick Scherbaum, Stefan |
author_sort | Schoemann, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mouse cursor tracking has become a prominent method for characterizing cognitive processes, used in a wide variety of domains of psychological science. Researchers have demonstrated considerable ingenuity in the application of the approach, but the methodology has not undergone systematic analysis to facilitate the development of best practices. Furthermore, recent research has demonstrated effects of experimental design features on a number of mousetracking outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the mouse-tracking literature to survey the reporting and spread of mouse variables (Cursor speed, Sampling rate, Training), physical characteristics of the experiments (Stimulus position, Response box position) and response requirements (Start procedure, Response procedure, Response deadline). This survey reveals that there is room for improvement in reporting practices, especially of subtler design features that researchers may have assumed would not impact research results (e.g., Cursor speed). We provide recommendations for future best practices in mouse-tracking studies and consider how best to standardize the mouse-tracking literature without excessively constraining the methodological flexibility that is essential to the field. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-020-01851-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8219569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82195692021-06-28 Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science Schoemann, Martin O’Hora, Denis Dale, Rick Scherbaum, Stefan Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical Review Mouse cursor tracking has become a prominent method for characterizing cognitive processes, used in a wide variety of domains of psychological science. Researchers have demonstrated considerable ingenuity in the application of the approach, but the methodology has not undergone systematic analysis to facilitate the development of best practices. Furthermore, recent research has demonstrated effects of experimental design features on a number of mousetracking outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the mouse-tracking literature to survey the reporting and spread of mouse variables (Cursor speed, Sampling rate, Training), physical characteristics of the experiments (Stimulus position, Response box position) and response requirements (Start procedure, Response procedure, Response deadline). This survey reveals that there is room for improvement in reporting practices, especially of subtler design features that researchers may have assumed would not impact research results (e.g., Cursor speed). We provide recommendations for future best practices in mouse-tracking studies and consider how best to standardize the mouse-tracking literature without excessively constraining the methodological flexibility that is essential to the field. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-020-01851-3. Springer US 2020-12-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8219569/ /pubmed/33319317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01851-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Theoretical Review Schoemann, Martin O’Hora, Denis Dale, Rick Scherbaum, Stefan Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science |
title | Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science |
title_full | Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science |
title_fullStr | Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science |
title_full_unstemmed | Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science |
title_short | Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science |
title_sort | using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science |
topic | Theoretical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01851-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoemannmartin usingmousecursortrackingtoinvestigateonlinecognitionpreservingmethodologicalingenuitywhilemovingtowardreproduciblescience AT ohoradenis usingmousecursortrackingtoinvestigateonlinecognitionpreservingmethodologicalingenuitywhilemovingtowardreproduciblescience AT dalerick usingmousecursortrackingtoinvestigateonlinecognitionpreservingmethodologicalingenuitywhilemovingtowardreproduciblescience AT scherbaumstefan usingmousecursortrackingtoinvestigateonlinecognitionpreservingmethodologicalingenuitywhilemovingtowardreproduciblescience |