Cargando…
Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
We acquire a lot of information about the world through texts, which can be categorized at the broadest level into two primary genres: narratives and exposition. Stories and essays differ across a variety of dimensions, including structure and content, with numerous theories hypothesizing that stori...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1 |
_version_ | 1783710960619356160 |
---|---|
author | Mar, Raymond A. Li, Jingyuan Nguyen, Anh T. P. Ta, Cindy P. |
author_facet | Mar, Raymond A. Li, Jingyuan Nguyen, Anh T. P. Ta, Cindy P. |
author_sort | Mar, Raymond A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We acquire a lot of information about the world through texts, which can be categorized at the broadest level into two primary genres: narratives and exposition. Stories and essays differ across a variety of dimensions, including structure and content, with numerous theories hypothesizing that stories are easier to understand and recall than essays. However, empirical work in this area has yielded mixed results. To synthesize research in this area, we conducted a meta-analysis of experiments in which memory and/or comprehension of narrative and expository texts was investigated. Based on over 75 unique samples and data from more than 33,000 participants, we found that stories were more easily understood and better recalled than essays. Moreover, this result was robust, not influenced by the inclusion of a single effect-size or single study, and not moderated by various study characteristics. This finding has implications for any domain in which acquiring and retaining information is important. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8219577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82195772021-06-28 Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis Mar, Raymond A. Li, Jingyuan Nguyen, Anh T. P. Ta, Cindy P. Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical Review We acquire a lot of information about the world through texts, which can be categorized at the broadest level into two primary genres: narratives and exposition. Stories and essays differ across a variety of dimensions, including structure and content, with numerous theories hypothesizing that stories are easier to understand and recall than essays. However, empirical work in this area has yielded mixed results. To synthesize research in this area, we conducted a meta-analysis of experiments in which memory and/or comprehension of narrative and expository texts was investigated. Based on over 75 unique samples and data from more than 33,000 participants, we found that stories were more easily understood and better recalled than essays. Moreover, this result was robust, not influenced by the inclusion of a single effect-size or single study, and not moderated by various study characteristics. This finding has implications for any domain in which acquiring and retaining information is important. Springer US 2021-01-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8219577/ /pubmed/33410100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Theoretical Review Mar, Raymond A. Li, Jingyuan Nguyen, Anh T. P. Ta, Cindy P. Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis |
title | Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: a meta-analysis |
topic | Theoretical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marraymonda memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis AT lijingyuan memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis AT nguyenanhtp memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis AT tacindyp memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis |