Cargando…

Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis

We acquire a lot of information about the world through texts, which can be categorized at the broadest level into two primary genres: narratives and exposition. Stories and essays differ across a variety of dimensions, including structure and content, with numerous theories hypothesizing that stori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mar, Raymond A., Li, Jingyuan, Nguyen, Anh T. P., Ta, Cindy P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
_version_ 1783710960619356160
author Mar, Raymond A.
Li, Jingyuan
Nguyen, Anh T. P.
Ta, Cindy P.
author_facet Mar, Raymond A.
Li, Jingyuan
Nguyen, Anh T. P.
Ta, Cindy P.
author_sort Mar, Raymond A.
collection PubMed
description We acquire a lot of information about the world through texts, which can be categorized at the broadest level into two primary genres: narratives and exposition. Stories and essays differ across a variety of dimensions, including structure and content, with numerous theories hypothesizing that stories are easier to understand and recall than essays. However, empirical work in this area has yielded mixed results. To synthesize research in this area, we conducted a meta-analysis of experiments in which memory and/or comprehension of narrative and expository texts was investigated. Based on over 75 unique samples and data from more than 33,000 participants, we found that stories were more easily understood and better recalled than essays. Moreover, this result was robust, not influenced by the inclusion of a single effect-size or single study, and not moderated by various study characteristics. This finding has implications for any domain in which acquiring and retaining information is important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8219577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82195772021-06-28 Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis Mar, Raymond A. Li, Jingyuan Nguyen, Anh T. P. Ta, Cindy P. Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical Review We acquire a lot of information about the world through texts, which can be categorized at the broadest level into two primary genres: narratives and exposition. Stories and essays differ across a variety of dimensions, including structure and content, with numerous theories hypothesizing that stories are easier to understand and recall than essays. However, empirical work in this area has yielded mixed results. To synthesize research in this area, we conducted a meta-analysis of experiments in which memory and/or comprehension of narrative and expository texts was investigated. Based on over 75 unique samples and data from more than 33,000 participants, we found that stories were more easily understood and better recalled than essays. Moreover, this result was robust, not influenced by the inclusion of a single effect-size or single study, and not moderated by various study characteristics. This finding has implications for any domain in which acquiring and retaining information is important. Springer US 2021-01-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8219577/ /pubmed/33410100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Theoretical Review
Mar, Raymond A.
Li, Jingyuan
Nguyen, Anh T. P.
Ta, Cindy P.
Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
title Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
title_full Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
title_short Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis
title_sort memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: a meta-analysis
topic Theoretical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
work_keys_str_mv AT marraymonda memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis
AT lijingyuan memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis
AT nguyenanhtp memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis
AT tacindyp memoryandcomprehensionofnarrativeversusexpositorytextsametaanalysis