Cargando…

Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies

Patient preferences are gaining recognition among key stakeholders involved in benefit-risk decision-making along the medical product lifecycle. However, one of the main challenges of integrating patient preferences in benefit-risk decision-making is understanding differences in patient preference,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Selena, Monzani, Dario, Pinto, Cathy Anne, Vergani, Laura, Marton, Giulia, Falahee, Marie, Simons, Gwenda, Whichello, Chiara, Kihlbom, Ulrik, Pravettoni, Gabriella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177261
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S261615
_version_ 1783710982622674944
author Russo, Selena
Monzani, Dario
Pinto, Cathy Anne
Vergani, Laura
Marton, Giulia
Falahee, Marie
Simons, Gwenda
Whichello, Chiara
Kihlbom, Ulrik
Pravettoni, Gabriella
author_facet Russo, Selena
Monzani, Dario
Pinto, Cathy Anne
Vergani, Laura
Marton, Giulia
Falahee, Marie
Simons, Gwenda
Whichello, Chiara
Kihlbom, Ulrik
Pravettoni, Gabriella
author_sort Russo, Selena
collection PubMed
description Patient preferences are gaining recognition among key stakeholders involved in benefit-risk decision-making along the medical product lifecycle. However, one of the main challenges of integrating patient preferences in benefit-risk decision-making is understanding differences in patient preference, which may be attributable to clinical characteristics (eg age, medical history) or psychosocial factors. Measuring the latter may provide valuable information to decision-makers but there is limited guidance regarding which psychological dimensions may influence patient preferences and which psychological instruments should be considered for inclusion in patient preference studies. This paper aims to provide such guidance by advancing evidence and consensus-based recommendations and considerations. Findings of a recent systematic review on psychological constructs having an impact on patients’ preferences and health-related decisions were expanded with input from an expert group (n = 11). These data were then used as the basis for final recommendations developed through two rounds of formal evaluation via an online Delphi consensus process involving international experts in the field of psychology, medical decision-making, and risk communication (n = 27). Three classes of recommendations emerged. Eleven psychological constructs reached consensus to be recommended for inclusion with the strongest consensus existing for health literacy, numeracy, illness perception and treatment-related beliefs. We also proposed a set of descriptive and checklist criteria to appraise available psychological measures to assist researchers and other stakeholders in including psychological assessment when planning patient preference studies. These recommendations can guide researchers and other stakeholders when designing and interpreting patient preference studies with a potential high impact in clinical practice and medical product benefit-risk decision-making processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8219660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82196602021-06-24 Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies Russo, Selena Monzani, Dario Pinto, Cathy Anne Vergani, Laura Marton, Giulia Falahee, Marie Simons, Gwenda Whichello, Chiara Kihlbom, Ulrik Pravettoni, Gabriella Patient Prefer Adherence Perspectives Patient preferences are gaining recognition among key stakeholders involved in benefit-risk decision-making along the medical product lifecycle. However, one of the main challenges of integrating patient preferences in benefit-risk decision-making is understanding differences in patient preference, which may be attributable to clinical characteristics (eg age, medical history) or psychosocial factors. Measuring the latter may provide valuable information to decision-makers but there is limited guidance regarding which psychological dimensions may influence patient preferences and which psychological instruments should be considered for inclusion in patient preference studies. This paper aims to provide such guidance by advancing evidence and consensus-based recommendations and considerations. Findings of a recent systematic review on psychological constructs having an impact on patients’ preferences and health-related decisions were expanded with input from an expert group (n = 11). These data were then used as the basis for final recommendations developed through two rounds of formal evaluation via an online Delphi consensus process involving international experts in the field of psychology, medical decision-making, and risk communication (n = 27). Three classes of recommendations emerged. Eleven psychological constructs reached consensus to be recommended for inclusion with the strongest consensus existing for health literacy, numeracy, illness perception and treatment-related beliefs. We also proposed a set of descriptive and checklist criteria to appraise available psychological measures to assist researchers and other stakeholders in including psychological assessment when planning patient preference studies. These recommendations can guide researchers and other stakeholders when designing and interpreting patient preference studies with a potential high impact in clinical practice and medical product benefit-risk decision-making processes. Dove 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8219660/ /pubmed/34177261 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S261615 Text en © 2021 Russo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Perspectives
Russo, Selena
Monzani, Dario
Pinto, Cathy Anne
Vergani, Laura
Marton, Giulia
Falahee, Marie
Simons, Gwenda
Whichello, Chiara
Kihlbom, Ulrik
Pravettoni, Gabriella
Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies
title Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies
title_full Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies
title_fullStr Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies
title_full_unstemmed Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies
title_short Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies
title_sort taking into account patient preferences: a consensus study on the assessment of psychological dimensions within patient preference studies
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177261
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S261615
work_keys_str_mv AT russoselena takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT monzanidario takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT pintocathyanne takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT verganilaura takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT martongiulia takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT falaheemarie takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT simonsgwenda takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT whichellochiara takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT kihlbomulrik takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies
AT pravettonigabriella takingintoaccountpatientpreferencesaconsensusstudyontheassessmentofpsychologicaldimensionswithinpatientpreferencestudies