Cargando…

A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT may guide treatment decisions in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). This study evaluated the added value of maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) to a novel DNA-damage immune response (DDIR) assay to improve pathological response prediction. The diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foley, Kieran G., Lavery, Anita, Napier, Eoin, Campbell, David, Eatock, Martin M., Kennedy, Richard D., Bradley, Kevin M., Turkington, Richard C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92545-w
_version_ 1783710996620115968
author Foley, Kieran G.
Lavery, Anita
Napier, Eoin
Campbell, David
Eatock, Martin M.
Kennedy, Richard D.
Bradley, Kevin M.
Turkington, Richard C.
author_facet Foley, Kieran G.
Lavery, Anita
Napier, Eoin
Campbell, David
Eatock, Martin M.
Kennedy, Richard D.
Bradley, Kevin M.
Turkington, Richard C.
author_sort Foley, Kieran G.
collection PubMed
description 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT may guide treatment decisions in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). This study evaluated the added value of maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) to a novel DNA-damage immune response (DDIR) assay to improve pathological response prediction. The diagnostic accuracy of PET response and the prognostic significance of PET metrics for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. This was a retrospective, single-centre study of OAC patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy from 2003 to 2014. SUVmax was recorded from baseline and repeat PET-CT after completion of pre-operative chemotherapy. Logistic regression models tested the additional predictive value of PET metrics combined with the DDIR assay for pathological response. Cox regression models tested the prognostic significance of PET metrics for RFS and OS. In total, 113 patients were included; 25 (22.1%) were DDIR positive and 88 (77.9%) were DDIR negative. 69 (61.1%) were PET responders (SUVmax reduction of 35%) and 44 (38.9%) were PET non-responders. After adding PET metrics to DDIR status, post-chemotherapy SUVmax (hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, p = 0.02), SUVmax change (HR 1.04, p = 0.003) and an optimum SUVmax reduction of 46.5% (HR 4.36, p = 0.021) showed additional value for predicting pathological response. The optimised SUVmax threshold was independently significant for RFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.85, p = 0.012) and OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26–0.99, p = 0.047). This study demonstrated the additional value of PET metrics, when combined with a novel DDIR assay, to predict pathological response in OAC patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, an optimised SUVmax reduction threshold for pathological response was calculated and was independently significant for RFS and OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8219719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82197192021-06-24 A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma Foley, Kieran G. Lavery, Anita Napier, Eoin Campbell, David Eatock, Martin M. Kennedy, Richard D. Bradley, Kevin M. Turkington, Richard C. Sci Rep Article 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT may guide treatment decisions in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). This study evaluated the added value of maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) to a novel DNA-damage immune response (DDIR) assay to improve pathological response prediction. The diagnostic accuracy of PET response and the prognostic significance of PET metrics for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. This was a retrospective, single-centre study of OAC patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy from 2003 to 2014. SUVmax was recorded from baseline and repeat PET-CT after completion of pre-operative chemotherapy. Logistic regression models tested the additional predictive value of PET metrics combined with the DDIR assay for pathological response. Cox regression models tested the prognostic significance of PET metrics for RFS and OS. In total, 113 patients were included; 25 (22.1%) were DDIR positive and 88 (77.9%) were DDIR negative. 69 (61.1%) were PET responders (SUVmax reduction of 35%) and 44 (38.9%) were PET non-responders. After adding PET metrics to DDIR status, post-chemotherapy SUVmax (hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, p = 0.02), SUVmax change (HR 1.04, p = 0.003) and an optimum SUVmax reduction of 46.5% (HR 4.36, p = 0.021) showed additional value for predicting pathological response. The optimised SUVmax threshold was independently significant for RFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.85, p = 0.012) and OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26–0.99, p = 0.047). This study demonstrated the additional value of PET metrics, when combined with a novel DDIR assay, to predict pathological response in OAC patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, an optimised SUVmax reduction threshold for pathological response was calculated and was independently significant for RFS and OS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8219719/ /pubmed/34158588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92545-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Foley, Kieran G.
Lavery, Anita
Napier, Eoin
Campbell, David
Eatock, Martin M.
Kennedy, Richard D.
Bradley, Kevin M.
Turkington, Richard C.
A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_short A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_sort dna-damage immune response assay combined with pet biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8219719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92545-w
work_keys_str_mv AT foleykierang adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT laveryanita adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT napiereoin adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT campbelldavid adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT eatockmartinm adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT kennedyrichardd adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT bradleykevinm adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT turkingtonrichardc adnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT foleykierang dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT laveryanita dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT napiereoin dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT campbelldavid dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT eatockmartinm dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT kennedyrichardd dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT bradleykevinm dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT turkingtonrichardc dnadamageimmuneresponseassaycombinedwithpetbiomarkerspredictsresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyandsurvivalinoesophagealadenocarcinoma