Cargando…

Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE: In 2014, an escalation plan and morning handover meetings were implemented in an intensive care unit (ICU) to reduce access block for post-operative care. In this study, the improvement intervention is revisited 5 years on with the objective to see if the changes are sustained and to unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ros, Eva, Ros, Axel, Austin, Elizabeth E, De Geer, Lina, Lane, Paul, Johnson, Andrew, Clay-Williams, Robyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8220473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047394
_version_ 1783711154064850944
author Ros, Eva
Ros, Axel
Austin, Elizabeth E
De Geer, Lina
Lane, Paul
Johnson, Andrew
Clay-Williams, Robyn
author_facet Ros, Eva
Ros, Axel
Austin, Elizabeth E
De Geer, Lina
Lane, Paul
Johnson, Andrew
Clay-Williams, Robyn
author_sort Ros, Eva
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In 2014, an escalation plan and morning handover meetings were implemented in an intensive care unit (ICU) to reduce access block for post-operative care. In this study, the improvement intervention is revisited 5 years on with the objective to see if the changes are sustained and to understand factors contributing to sustainability. DESIGN: A mixed-method approach was used, with quantitative analysis of ICU administrative data and qualitative analysis of interviews with hospital management and ICU staff. SETTING: ICU with mixed surgical and non-surgical cases in a regional hospital in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Interview participants: ICU nurses (four), ICU doctors (four) and hospital management (four). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Monthly number of elective surgeries were cancelled due to unavailability of ICU beds. Staff perceptions of the interventions and factors contributed to sustainability. RESULTS: After a decline in elective surgeries being cancelled in the first year after the intervention, there was an increase in cancellations in the following years (χ(2)=16.38, p=0.003). Lack of knowledge about the intervention and competitive interests in the management of patient flow were believed to be obstacles for sustained effects of the original intervention. So were communication deficiencies that were reported within the ICU and between ICU and other departments. There are discrepancies between how nurses and doctors use the escalation plan and regard the availability of ICU beds. CONCLUSION: Improvement interventions in healthcare that appear initially to be successful are not necessarily sustained over time, as was the case in this study. In healthcare, there is no such thing as a ‘fix and forget’ solution for interventions. Management commitment to support communication within and between microsystems, and to support healthcare staff understanding of the underlying reasons for intervention, are important implications for change and change management across healthcare systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8220473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82204732021-07-09 Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study Ros, Eva Ros, Axel Austin, Elizabeth E De Geer, Lina Lane, Paul Johnson, Andrew Clay-Williams, Robyn BMJ Open Medical Management OBJECTIVE: In 2014, an escalation plan and morning handover meetings were implemented in an intensive care unit (ICU) to reduce access block for post-operative care. In this study, the improvement intervention is revisited 5 years on with the objective to see if the changes are sustained and to understand factors contributing to sustainability. DESIGN: A mixed-method approach was used, with quantitative analysis of ICU administrative data and qualitative analysis of interviews with hospital management and ICU staff. SETTING: ICU with mixed surgical and non-surgical cases in a regional hospital in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Interview participants: ICU nurses (four), ICU doctors (four) and hospital management (four). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Monthly number of elective surgeries were cancelled due to unavailability of ICU beds. Staff perceptions of the interventions and factors contributed to sustainability. RESULTS: After a decline in elective surgeries being cancelled in the first year after the intervention, there was an increase in cancellations in the following years (χ(2)=16.38, p=0.003). Lack of knowledge about the intervention and competitive interests in the management of patient flow were believed to be obstacles for sustained effects of the original intervention. So were communication deficiencies that were reported within the ICU and between ICU and other departments. There are discrepancies between how nurses and doctors use the escalation plan and regard the availability of ICU beds. CONCLUSION: Improvement interventions in healthcare that appear initially to be successful are not necessarily sustained over time, as was the case in this study. In healthcare, there is no such thing as a ‘fix and forget’ solution for interventions. Management commitment to support communication within and between microsystems, and to support healthcare staff understanding of the underlying reasons for intervention, are important implications for change and change management across healthcare systems. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8220473/ /pubmed/34158303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047394 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Management
Ros, Eva
Ros, Axel
Austin, Elizabeth E
De Geer, Lina
Lane, Paul
Johnson, Andrew
Clay-Williams, Robyn
Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study
title Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study
title_full Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study
title_fullStr Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study
title_short Sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study
title_sort sustainment of a patient flow intervention in an intensive care unit in a regional hospital in australia: a mixed-method, 5-year follow-up study
topic Medical Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8220473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34158303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047394
work_keys_str_mv AT roseva sustainmentofapatientflowinterventioninanintensivecareunitinaregionalhospitalinaustraliaamixedmethod5yearfollowupstudy
AT rosaxel sustainmentofapatientflowinterventioninanintensivecareunitinaregionalhospitalinaustraliaamixedmethod5yearfollowupstudy
AT austinelizabethe sustainmentofapatientflowinterventioninanintensivecareunitinaregionalhospitalinaustraliaamixedmethod5yearfollowupstudy
AT degeerlina sustainmentofapatientflowinterventioninanintensivecareunitinaregionalhospitalinaustraliaamixedmethod5yearfollowupstudy
AT lanepaul sustainmentofapatientflowinterventioninanintensivecareunitinaregionalhospitalinaustraliaamixedmethod5yearfollowupstudy
AT johnsonandrew sustainmentofapatientflowinterventioninanintensivecareunitinaregionalhospitalinaustraliaamixedmethod5yearfollowupstudy
AT claywilliamsrobyn sustainmentofapatientflowinterventioninanintensivecareunitinaregionalhospitalinaustraliaamixedmethod5yearfollowupstudy