Cargando…

Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: To screen manuscripts that discuss rehabilitation protocols for patients who underwent superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) to elucidate whether a standard rehabilitation algorithm exists for SCR. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavin, Alessia C., Mansour, Kailey L., Greif, Dylan N., Shallop, Brandon J., Allegra, Paul R., Sanchez, Rafael A., Muñoz, Julianne, Baraga, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8220571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34195662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.001
_version_ 1783711171318120448
author Lavin, Alessia C.
Mansour, Kailey L.
Greif, Dylan N.
Shallop, Brandon J.
Allegra, Paul R.
Sanchez, Rafael A.
Muñoz, Julianne
Baraga, Michael G.
author_facet Lavin, Alessia C.
Mansour, Kailey L.
Greif, Dylan N.
Shallop, Brandon J.
Allegra, Paul R.
Sanchez, Rafael A.
Muñoz, Julianne
Baraga, Michael G.
author_sort Lavin, Alessia C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To screen manuscripts that discuss rehabilitation protocols for patients who underwent superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) to elucidate whether a standard rehabilitation algorithm exists for SCR. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (i.e., PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase were searched using pertinent Boolean operation terms “superior capsular reconstruction” and “rotator cuff repair rehabilitation,” and articles that included rehabilitation protocols following superior capsular reconstruction surgery were reviewed. Two independent reviewers performed the search and quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 549 articles were yielded after our database search. Fourteen studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Study designs included 9 editorials, 3 case series, and 2 case reports. Each study included in this review used a unique rehabilitation algorithm that posed significant variability between the protocols. Four phases were identified to summarize each protocol and were used as a basis of discussion—sling versus brace time (3-6 weeks for comfort/removal vs complete immobilization), passive range of motion (immediately after surgery to initiation at 6 weeks), active range of motion (4-8 weeks), and strengthening/return to full activity (12-52 weeks). Initiation of rehabilitation, length of time spent in each phase, types of exercises, and overarching goals for return to function were significantly variable and were decided upon by the surgeon based on current massive rotator cuff repair protocols. Presently, there is no standard rehabilitation protocol for SCR. CONCLUSIONS: SCR is a relatively new procedure that is gaining rapid popularity with promising outcomes. Based on our review, there is no standard rehabilitation protocol in place; thus, it is not possible to recommend an evidence-based rehabilitation protocol following SCR at this time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, systematic review of Level IV and V studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8220571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82205712021-06-29 Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review Lavin, Alessia C. Mansour, Kailey L. Greif, Dylan N. Shallop, Brandon J. Allegra, Paul R. Sanchez, Rafael A. Muñoz, Julianne Baraga, Michael G. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Systematic Review PURPOSE: To screen manuscripts that discuss rehabilitation protocols for patients who underwent superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) to elucidate whether a standard rehabilitation algorithm exists for SCR. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (i.e., PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase were searched using pertinent Boolean operation terms “superior capsular reconstruction” and “rotator cuff repair rehabilitation,” and articles that included rehabilitation protocols following superior capsular reconstruction surgery were reviewed. Two independent reviewers performed the search and quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 549 articles were yielded after our database search. Fourteen studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Study designs included 9 editorials, 3 case series, and 2 case reports. Each study included in this review used a unique rehabilitation algorithm that posed significant variability between the protocols. Four phases were identified to summarize each protocol and were used as a basis of discussion—sling versus brace time (3-6 weeks for comfort/removal vs complete immobilization), passive range of motion (immediately after surgery to initiation at 6 weeks), active range of motion (4-8 weeks), and strengthening/return to full activity (12-52 weeks). Initiation of rehabilitation, length of time spent in each phase, types of exercises, and overarching goals for return to function were significantly variable and were decided upon by the surgeon based on current massive rotator cuff repair protocols. Presently, there is no standard rehabilitation protocol for SCR. CONCLUSIONS: SCR is a relatively new procedure that is gaining rapid popularity with promising outcomes. Based on our review, there is no standard rehabilitation protocol in place; thus, it is not possible to recommend an evidence-based rehabilitation protocol following SCR at this time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, systematic review of Level IV and V studies. Elsevier 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8220571/ /pubmed/34195662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lavin, Alessia C.
Mansour, Kailey L.
Greif, Dylan N.
Shallop, Brandon J.
Allegra, Paul R.
Sanchez, Rafael A.
Muñoz, Julianne
Baraga, Michael G.
Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review
title Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review
title_full Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review
title_short Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review
title_sort rehabilitation protocols for superior capsular reconstruction are variable: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8220571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34195662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT lavinalessiac rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview
AT mansourkaileyl rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview
AT greifdylann rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview
AT shallopbrandonj rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview
AT allegrapaulr rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview
AT sanchezrafaela rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview
AT munozjulianne rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview
AT baragamichaelg rehabilitationprotocolsforsuperiorcapsularreconstructionarevariableasystematicreview