Cargando…
Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND: Describing implementation features of an intervention is required to compare interventions and to inform policy and best practice. The aim of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of the first 12 months of the Sophia Step Study: a primary care based RCT evaluating a multicompone...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8220758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34157994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11222-9 |
_version_ | 1783711209211559936 |
---|---|
author | Rossen, Jenny Hagströmer, Maria Yngve, Agneta Brismar, Kerstin Ainsworth, Barbara Johansson, Unn-Britt |
author_facet | Rossen, Jenny Hagströmer, Maria Yngve, Agneta Brismar, Kerstin Ainsworth, Barbara Johansson, Unn-Britt |
author_sort | Rossen, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Describing implementation features of an intervention is required to compare interventions and to inform policy and best practice. The aim of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of the first 12 months of the Sophia Step Study: a primary care based RCT evaluating a multicomponent (self-monitoring of daily steps plus counseling) and a single component (self-monitoring of steps only) physical activity intervention to standard care on cardiometabolic health. METHODS: The evaluation was guided by the Medical Research Council Guidance for complex interventions. To describe the implementation communication with the health professionals implementing the interventions, attendance records and tracking of days with self-monitored pedometer-determined steps were used. Change in physical activity behaviour was measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months as daily steps by accelerometry. RESULTS: During April 2013 to January 2018 188 participants were randomized and intervened directly after inclusion. Response rate was 49% and drop out was 10%. A majority, 78%, had type 2 diabetes and 22% were diagnosed with prediabetes. Mean [Standard deviation (SD)] body mass index was 30.4 (4.4) kg/m(2) and steps per day was 6566 (3086). The interventions were delivered as intended with minor deviation from the protocol and dose received was satisfying for both the multicomponent and single component group. The mean [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] change in daily steps from baseline to 6 months was 941(227, 1655) steps/day for the multicomponent intervention group, 990 (145, 1836) step/day for the single component group and − 506 (− 1118, 107) for the control group. The mean (95% CI) change in daily steps from baseline to 12 months was 31(− 507, 570) steps/day for the multicomponent intervention group, 144 (− 566, 853) step/day for the single component group and − 890 (− 1485, − 294) for the control group. There was a large individual variation in daily steps at baseline as well as in step change in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Applying self-monitoring of steps is a feasible method to implement as support for physical activity in the primary care setting both with and without counseling support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02374788. Registered 2 March 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11222-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8220758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82207582021-06-24 Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes Rossen, Jenny Hagströmer, Maria Yngve, Agneta Brismar, Kerstin Ainsworth, Barbara Johansson, Unn-Britt BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Describing implementation features of an intervention is required to compare interventions and to inform policy and best practice. The aim of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of the first 12 months of the Sophia Step Study: a primary care based RCT evaluating a multicomponent (self-monitoring of daily steps plus counseling) and a single component (self-monitoring of steps only) physical activity intervention to standard care on cardiometabolic health. METHODS: The evaluation was guided by the Medical Research Council Guidance for complex interventions. To describe the implementation communication with the health professionals implementing the interventions, attendance records and tracking of days with self-monitored pedometer-determined steps were used. Change in physical activity behaviour was measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months as daily steps by accelerometry. RESULTS: During April 2013 to January 2018 188 participants were randomized and intervened directly after inclusion. Response rate was 49% and drop out was 10%. A majority, 78%, had type 2 diabetes and 22% were diagnosed with prediabetes. Mean [Standard deviation (SD)] body mass index was 30.4 (4.4) kg/m(2) and steps per day was 6566 (3086). The interventions were delivered as intended with minor deviation from the protocol and dose received was satisfying for both the multicomponent and single component group. The mean [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] change in daily steps from baseline to 6 months was 941(227, 1655) steps/day for the multicomponent intervention group, 990 (145, 1836) step/day for the single component group and − 506 (− 1118, 107) for the control group. The mean (95% CI) change in daily steps from baseline to 12 months was 31(− 507, 570) steps/day for the multicomponent intervention group, 144 (− 566, 853) step/day for the single component group and − 890 (− 1485, − 294) for the control group. There was a large individual variation in daily steps at baseline as well as in step change in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Applying self-monitoring of steps is a feasible method to implement as support for physical activity in the primary care setting both with and without counseling support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02374788. Registered 2 March 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11222-9. BioMed Central 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8220758/ /pubmed/34157994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11222-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rossen, Jenny Hagströmer, Maria Yngve, Agneta Brismar, Kerstin Ainsworth, Barbara Johansson, Unn-Britt Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes |
title | Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes |
title_full | Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes |
title_fullStr | Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes |
title_short | Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes |
title_sort | process evaluation of the sophia step study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8220758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34157994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11222-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossenjenny processevaluationofthesophiastepstudyaprimarycarebasedthreearmedrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingselfmonitoringofstepswithandwithoutcounselinginprediabetesandtype2diabetes AT hagstromermaria processevaluationofthesophiastepstudyaprimarycarebasedthreearmedrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingselfmonitoringofstepswithandwithoutcounselinginprediabetesandtype2diabetes AT yngveagneta processevaluationofthesophiastepstudyaprimarycarebasedthreearmedrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingselfmonitoringofstepswithandwithoutcounselinginprediabetesandtype2diabetes AT brismarkerstin processevaluationofthesophiastepstudyaprimarycarebasedthreearmedrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingselfmonitoringofstepswithandwithoutcounselinginprediabetesandtype2diabetes AT ainsworthbarbara processevaluationofthesophiastepstudyaprimarycarebasedthreearmedrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingselfmonitoringofstepswithandwithoutcounselinginprediabetesandtype2diabetes AT johanssonunnbritt processevaluationofthesophiastepstudyaprimarycarebasedthreearmedrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingselfmonitoringofstepswithandwithoutcounselinginprediabetesandtype2diabetes |