Cargando…

Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess sedentary work's contribution to breast cancer risk quantitatively using thorough research articles. METHODS: We performed a meta‐analysis using a registered protocol in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020204629). Literatu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jongin, Lee, JaeYong, Lee, Dong‐Wook, Kim, Hyoung‐Ryoul, Kang, Mo‐Yeol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34161650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12239
_version_ 1783711317477031936
author Lee, Jongin
Lee, JaeYong
Lee, Dong‐Wook
Kim, Hyoung‐Ryoul
Kang, Mo‐Yeol
author_facet Lee, Jongin
Lee, JaeYong
Lee, Dong‐Wook
Kim, Hyoung‐Ryoul
Kang, Mo‐Yeol
author_sort Lee, Jongin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess sedentary work's contribution to breast cancer risk quantitatively using thorough research articles. METHODS: We performed a meta‐analysis using a registered protocol in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020204629). Literature from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane involving sedentary work and breast cancer risk was reviewed. We calculated the overall pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CI with a random‐effect model from the included studies. Furthermore, we performed stratified analyses by characteristics of studies. RESULTS: Thirty‐one studies (13 cohort studies and 18 case‐control studies) were included in the analysis. The overall effect of the pooled analysis was an RR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.08‐1.23). The results were 1.20 (95% CI 1.10‐1.30) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.02‐1.23) for cohort and case‐control studies. The effect of sedentary work did not seem to be consistently attenuated by controlling body mass index, menopausal status, or experience of hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: The results from this meta‐analysis suggest that sedentary behavior within the occupational domain was associated with a 15.5% increased risk of breast cancer. It is essential to reduce the sedentary time spent at work and to secure time for leisure‐time physical activity among sedentary workers as a primary preventive measure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8221371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82213712021-06-28 Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Lee, Jongin Lee, JaeYong Lee, Dong‐Wook Kim, Hyoung‐Ryoul Kang, Mo‐Yeol J Occup Health Review Articles OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess sedentary work's contribution to breast cancer risk quantitatively using thorough research articles. METHODS: We performed a meta‐analysis using a registered protocol in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020204629). Literature from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane involving sedentary work and breast cancer risk was reviewed. We calculated the overall pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CI with a random‐effect model from the included studies. Furthermore, we performed stratified analyses by characteristics of studies. RESULTS: Thirty‐one studies (13 cohort studies and 18 case‐control studies) were included in the analysis. The overall effect of the pooled analysis was an RR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.08‐1.23). The results were 1.20 (95% CI 1.10‐1.30) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.02‐1.23) for cohort and case‐control studies. The effect of sedentary work did not seem to be consistently attenuated by controlling body mass index, menopausal status, or experience of hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: The results from this meta‐analysis suggest that sedentary behavior within the occupational domain was associated with a 15.5% increased risk of breast cancer. It is essential to reduce the sedentary time spent at work and to secure time for leisure‐time physical activity among sedentary workers as a primary preventive measure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8221371/ /pubmed/34161650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12239 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Lee, Jongin
Lee, JaeYong
Lee, Dong‐Wook
Kim, Hyoung‐Ryoul
Kang, Mo‐Yeol
Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Sedentary work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort sedentary work and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34161650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12239
work_keys_str_mv AT leejongin sedentaryworkandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leejaeyong sedentaryworkandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leedongwook sedentaryworkandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimhyoungryoul sedentaryworkandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kangmoyeol sedentaryworkandbreastcancerriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis