Cargando…

Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) comprise coordinated interventions designed to improve antimicrobial use. Understanding the current structure of ASP hospitals will support interventions for the improvement of these programs. This study aimed to describe the status of ASPs in ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Silvia Akemi, Brandão, Denise Assis, Madalosso, Geraldine, Levin, Anna S., Perdigão, Lauro Vieira, Oliveira, Maura Salaroli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190852
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2882
_version_ 1783711348472938496
author Sato, Silvia Akemi
Brandão, Denise Assis
Madalosso, Geraldine
Levin, Anna S.
Perdigão, Lauro Vieira
Oliveira, Maura Salaroli
author_facet Sato, Silvia Akemi
Brandão, Denise Assis
Madalosso, Geraldine
Levin, Anna S.
Perdigão, Lauro Vieira
Oliveira, Maura Salaroli
author_sort Sato, Silvia Akemi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) comprise coordinated interventions designed to improve antimicrobial use. Understanding the current structure of ASP hospitals will support interventions for the improvement of these programs. This study aimed to describe the status of ASPs in hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on the ASPs of hospitals in the state of São Paulo from March to July 2018. Through interviews by telephone or e-mail, we queried which components of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines were implemented. RESULTS: The response rate was 30% (28/93 hospitals), and 26 hospitals (85%) reported having a formal ASP. The most frequently implemented strategies were antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis guidelines (100%), empiric sepsis guidelines (93%), and the presence of ASP team members during bedside rounds (96%). The least commonly implemented strategies included prior authorization for all antimicrobials (11%), pharmacokinetic monitoring, and an adjustment program for patients on IV aminoglycosides (3%). Regarding the metrics of the ASP, the most common indicator was the rate of antimicrobial resistance (77%). Eighteen hospitals evaluated antimicrobial consumption using defined daily dose, and only 29% evaluated the days of therapy; 61% of hospitals reported their results to the hospital administration and 39% to the prescribers. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitals have a formal and active ASP, but with timely actions. We observed inconsistencies between what program leaders understand as the main objective of ASP and the metrics used to evaluate it. Part of the effort for the next few years should be to improve program evaluation metrics and to provide feedback to physicians and hospital leadership.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8221563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82215632021-06-25 Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals Sato, Silvia Akemi Brandão, Denise Assis Madalosso, Geraldine Levin, Anna S. Perdigão, Lauro Vieira Oliveira, Maura Salaroli Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) comprise coordinated interventions designed to improve antimicrobial use. Understanding the current structure of ASP hospitals will support interventions for the improvement of these programs. This study aimed to describe the status of ASPs in hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on the ASPs of hospitals in the state of São Paulo from March to July 2018. Through interviews by telephone or e-mail, we queried which components of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines were implemented. RESULTS: The response rate was 30% (28/93 hospitals), and 26 hospitals (85%) reported having a formal ASP. The most frequently implemented strategies were antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis guidelines (100%), empiric sepsis guidelines (93%), and the presence of ASP team members during bedside rounds (96%). The least commonly implemented strategies included prior authorization for all antimicrobials (11%), pharmacokinetic monitoring, and an adjustment program for patients on IV aminoglycosides (3%). Regarding the metrics of the ASP, the most common indicator was the rate of antimicrobial resistance (77%). Eighteen hospitals evaluated antimicrobial consumption using defined daily dose, and only 29% evaluated the days of therapy; 61% of hospitals reported their results to the hospital administration and 39% to the prescribers. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitals have a formal and active ASP, but with timely actions. We observed inconsistencies between what program leaders understand as the main objective of ASP and the metrics used to evaluate it. Part of the effort for the next few years should be to improve program evaluation metrics and to provide feedback to physicians and hospital leadership. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021-06-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8221563/ /pubmed/34190852 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2882 Text en Copyright © 2021 CLINICS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sato, Silvia Akemi
Brandão, Denise Assis
Madalosso, Geraldine
Levin, Anna S.
Perdigão, Lauro Vieira
Oliveira, Maura Salaroli
Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals
title Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals
title_full Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals
title_fullStr Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals
title_short Current Status of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in São Paulo Hospitals
title_sort current status of antimicrobial stewardship programs in são paulo hospitals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190852
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2882
work_keys_str_mv AT satosilviaakemi currentstatusofantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsinsaopaulohospitals
AT brandaodeniseassis currentstatusofantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsinsaopaulohospitals
AT madalossogeraldine currentstatusofantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsinsaopaulohospitals
AT levinannas currentstatusofantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsinsaopaulohospitals
AT perdigaolaurovieira currentstatusofantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsinsaopaulohospitals
AT oliveiramaurasalaroli currentstatusofantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsinsaopaulohospitals