Cargando…

Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banerjee, Elaine Seaton, Shaak, Kyle, Burgess, Nicole, Johnson, Melanie, Careyva, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579
_version_ 1783711368797487104
author Banerjee, Elaine Seaton
Shaak, Kyle
Burgess, Nicole
Johnson, Melanie
Careyva, Beth
author_facet Banerjee, Elaine Seaton
Shaak, Kyle
Burgess, Nicole
Johnson, Melanie
Careyva, Beth
author_sort Banerjee, Elaine Seaton
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. RESULTS: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8221680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82216802021-07-01 Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations Banerjee, Elaine Seaton Shaak, Kyle Burgess, Nicole Johnson, Melanie Careyva, Beth J Prim Care Community Health Original Research INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. RESULTS: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed. SAGE Publications 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8221680/ /pubmed/34151635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Banerjee, Elaine Seaton
Shaak, Kyle
Burgess, Nicole
Johnson, Melanie
Careyva, Beth
Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations
title Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations
title_full Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations
title_fullStr Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations
title_short Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations
title_sort factors associated with clinician adherence to uspstf diabetes screening recommendations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579
work_keys_str_mv AT banerjeeelaineseaton factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations
AT shaakkyle factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations
AT burgessnicole factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations
AT johnsonmelanie factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations
AT careyvabeth factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations