Cargando…
Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579 |
_version_ | 1783711368797487104 |
---|---|
author | Banerjee, Elaine Seaton Shaak, Kyle Burgess, Nicole Johnson, Melanie Careyva, Beth |
author_facet | Banerjee, Elaine Seaton Shaak, Kyle Burgess, Nicole Johnson, Melanie Careyva, Beth |
author_sort | Banerjee, Elaine Seaton |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. RESULTS: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8221680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82216802021-07-01 Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations Banerjee, Elaine Seaton Shaak, Kyle Burgess, Nicole Johnson, Melanie Careyva, Beth J Prim Care Community Health Original Research INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. RESULTS: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed. SAGE Publications 2021-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8221680/ /pubmed/34151635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Banerjee, Elaine Seaton Shaak, Kyle Burgess, Nicole Johnson, Melanie Careyva, Beth Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations |
title | Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations |
title_full | Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations |
title_fullStr | Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations |
title_short | Factors Associated with Clinician Adherence to USPSTF Diabetes Screening Recommendations |
title_sort | factors associated with clinician adherence to uspstf diabetes screening recommendations |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banerjeeelaineseaton factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations AT shaakkyle factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations AT burgessnicole factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations AT johnsonmelanie factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations AT careyvabeth factorsassociatedwithclinicianadherencetouspstfdiabetesscreeningrecommendations |