Cargando…
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial
BACKGROUND: BBV152 is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (3 μg or 6 μg) formulated with a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule (IMDG) adsorbed to alum (Algel). We previously reported findings from a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 1 trial on the safety and immun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00070-0 |
_version_ | 1783711381181169664 |
---|---|
author | Ella, Raches Reddy, Siddharth Jogdand, Harsh Sarangi, Vamshi Ganneru, Brunda Prasad, Sai Das, Dipankar Raju, Dugyala Praturi, Usha Sapkal, Gajanan Yadav, Pragya Reddy, Prabhakar Verma, Savita Singh, Chandramani Redkar, Sagar Vivek Gillurkar, Chandra Sekhar Kushwaha, Jitendra Singh Mohapatra, Satyajit Bhate, Amit Rai, Sanjay Panda, Samiran Abraham, Priya Gupta, Nivedita Ella, Krishna Bhargava, Balram Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan |
author_facet | Ella, Raches Reddy, Siddharth Jogdand, Harsh Sarangi, Vamshi Ganneru, Brunda Prasad, Sai Das, Dipankar Raju, Dugyala Praturi, Usha Sapkal, Gajanan Yadav, Pragya Reddy, Prabhakar Verma, Savita Singh, Chandramani Redkar, Sagar Vivek Gillurkar, Chandra Sekhar Kushwaha, Jitendra Singh Mohapatra, Satyajit Bhate, Amit Rai, Sanjay Panda, Samiran Abraham, Priya Gupta, Nivedita Ella, Krishna Bhargava, Balram Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan |
author_sort | Ella, Raches |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: BBV152 is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (3 μg or 6 μg) formulated with a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule (IMDG) adsorbed to alum (Algel). We previously reported findings from a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 1 trial on the safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of BBV152 (3 μg with Algel-IMDG, 6 μg with Algel-IMDG, or 6 μg with Algel) and one Algel-only control (no antigen), with the first dose administered on day 0 and the second dose on day 14. The 3 μg and 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulations were selected for this phase 2 study. Herein, we report interim findings of the phase 2 trial on the immunogenicity and safety of BBV152, with the first dose administered on day 0 and the second dose on day 28. METHODS: We did a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of BBV152 in healthy adults and adolescents (aged 12–65 years) at nine hospitals in India. Participants with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and serology tests were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 3 μg with Algel-IMDG or 6 μg with Algel-IMDG. Block randomisation was done by use of an interactive web response system. Participants, investigators, study coordinators, study-related personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. Two intramuscular doses of vaccine were administered on day 0 and day 28. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibody titres and seroconversion rates (defined as a post-vaccination titre that was at least four-fold higher than the baseline titre) at 4 weeks after the second dose (day 56), measured by use of the plaque-reduction neutralisation test (PRNT(50)) and the microneutralisation test (MNT(50)). The primary outcome was assessed in all participants who had received both doses of the vaccine. Cell-mediated responses were a secondary outcome and were assessed by T-helper-1 (Th1)/Th2 profiling at 2 weeks after the second dose (day 42). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the vaccine. In addition, we report immunogenicity results from a follow-up blood draw collected from phase 1 trial participants at 3 months after they received the second dose (day 104). This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04471519. FINDINGS: Between Sept 5 and 12, 2020, 921 participants were screened, of whom 380 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group (n=190) or 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group (n=190). Geometric mean titres (GMTs; PRNT(50)) at day 56 were significantly higher in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group (197·0 [95% CI 155·6–249·4]) than the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group (100·9 [74·1–137·4]; p=0·0041). Seroconversion based on PRNT(50) at day 56 was reported in 171 (92·9% [95% CI 88·2–96·2] of 184 participants in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group and 174 (98·3% [95·1–99·6]) of 177 participants in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group. GMTs (MNT(50)) at day 56 were 92·5 (95% CI 77·7–110·2) in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group and 160·1 (135·8–188·8) in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group. Seroconversion based on MNT(50) at day 56 was reported in 162 (88·0% [95% CI 82·4–92·3]) of 184 participants in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group and 171 (96·6% [92·8–98·8]) of 177 participants in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group. The 3 μg with Algel-IMDG and 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulations elicited T-cell responses that were biased to a Th1 phenotype at day 42. No significant difference in the proportion of participants who had a solicited local or systemic adverse reaction in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group (38 [20·0%; 95% CI 14·7–26·5] of 190) and the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group (40 [21·1%; 15·5–27·5] of 190) was observed on days 0–7 and days 28–35; no serious adverse events were reported in the study. From the phase 1 trial, 3-month post-second-dose GMTs (MNT(50)) were 39·9 (95% CI 32·0–49·9) in the 3μg with Algel-IMDG group, 69·5 (53·7–89·9) in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group, 53·3 (40·1–71·0) in the 6 μg with Algel group, and 20·7 (14·5–29·5) in the Algel alone group. INTERPRETATION: In the phase 1 trial, BBV152 induced high neutralising antibody responses that remained elevated in all participants at 3 months after the second vaccination. In the phase 2 trial, BBV152 showed better reactogenicity and safety outcomes, and enhanced humoral and cell-mediated immune responses compared with the phase 1 trial. The 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulation has been selected for the phase 3 efficacy trial. FUNDING: Bharat Biotech International. TRANSLATION: For the Hindi translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8221739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82217392021-06-25 Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial Ella, Raches Reddy, Siddharth Jogdand, Harsh Sarangi, Vamshi Ganneru, Brunda Prasad, Sai Das, Dipankar Raju, Dugyala Praturi, Usha Sapkal, Gajanan Yadav, Pragya Reddy, Prabhakar Verma, Savita Singh, Chandramani Redkar, Sagar Vivek Gillurkar, Chandra Sekhar Kushwaha, Jitendra Singh Mohapatra, Satyajit Bhate, Amit Rai, Sanjay Panda, Samiran Abraham, Priya Gupta, Nivedita Ella, Krishna Bhargava, Balram Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: BBV152 is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (3 μg or 6 μg) formulated with a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule (IMDG) adsorbed to alum (Algel). We previously reported findings from a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 1 trial on the safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of BBV152 (3 μg with Algel-IMDG, 6 μg with Algel-IMDG, or 6 μg with Algel) and one Algel-only control (no antigen), with the first dose administered on day 0 and the second dose on day 14. The 3 μg and 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulations were selected for this phase 2 study. Herein, we report interim findings of the phase 2 trial on the immunogenicity and safety of BBV152, with the first dose administered on day 0 and the second dose on day 28. METHODS: We did a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of BBV152 in healthy adults and adolescents (aged 12–65 years) at nine hospitals in India. Participants with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and serology tests were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 3 μg with Algel-IMDG or 6 μg with Algel-IMDG. Block randomisation was done by use of an interactive web response system. Participants, investigators, study coordinators, study-related personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. Two intramuscular doses of vaccine were administered on day 0 and day 28. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibody titres and seroconversion rates (defined as a post-vaccination titre that was at least four-fold higher than the baseline titre) at 4 weeks after the second dose (day 56), measured by use of the plaque-reduction neutralisation test (PRNT(50)) and the microneutralisation test (MNT(50)). The primary outcome was assessed in all participants who had received both doses of the vaccine. Cell-mediated responses were a secondary outcome and were assessed by T-helper-1 (Th1)/Th2 profiling at 2 weeks after the second dose (day 42). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the vaccine. In addition, we report immunogenicity results from a follow-up blood draw collected from phase 1 trial participants at 3 months after they received the second dose (day 104). This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04471519. FINDINGS: Between Sept 5 and 12, 2020, 921 participants were screened, of whom 380 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group (n=190) or 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group (n=190). Geometric mean titres (GMTs; PRNT(50)) at day 56 were significantly higher in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group (197·0 [95% CI 155·6–249·4]) than the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group (100·9 [74·1–137·4]; p=0·0041). Seroconversion based on PRNT(50) at day 56 was reported in 171 (92·9% [95% CI 88·2–96·2] of 184 participants in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group and 174 (98·3% [95·1–99·6]) of 177 participants in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group. GMTs (MNT(50)) at day 56 were 92·5 (95% CI 77·7–110·2) in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group and 160·1 (135·8–188·8) in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group. Seroconversion based on MNT(50) at day 56 was reported in 162 (88·0% [95% CI 82·4–92·3]) of 184 participants in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group and 171 (96·6% [92·8–98·8]) of 177 participants in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group. The 3 μg with Algel-IMDG and 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulations elicited T-cell responses that were biased to a Th1 phenotype at day 42. No significant difference in the proportion of participants who had a solicited local or systemic adverse reaction in the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group (38 [20·0%; 95% CI 14·7–26·5] of 190) and the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group (40 [21·1%; 15·5–27·5] of 190) was observed on days 0–7 and days 28–35; no serious adverse events were reported in the study. From the phase 1 trial, 3-month post-second-dose GMTs (MNT(50)) were 39·9 (95% CI 32·0–49·9) in the 3μg with Algel-IMDG group, 69·5 (53·7–89·9) in the 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group, 53·3 (40·1–71·0) in the 6 μg with Algel group, and 20·7 (14·5–29·5) in the Algel alone group. INTERPRETATION: In the phase 1 trial, BBV152 induced high neutralising antibody responses that remained elevated in all participants at 3 months after the second vaccination. In the phase 2 trial, BBV152 showed better reactogenicity and safety outcomes, and enhanced humoral and cell-mediated immune responses compared with the phase 1 trial. The 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulation has been selected for the phase 3 efficacy trial. FUNDING: Bharat Biotech International. TRANSLATION: For the Hindi translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-07 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8221739/ /pubmed/33705727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00070-0 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Articles Ella, Raches Reddy, Siddharth Jogdand, Harsh Sarangi, Vamshi Ganneru, Brunda Prasad, Sai Das, Dipankar Raju, Dugyala Praturi, Usha Sapkal, Gajanan Yadav, Pragya Reddy, Prabhakar Verma, Savita Singh, Chandramani Redkar, Sagar Vivek Gillurkar, Chandra Sekhar Kushwaha, Jitendra Singh Mohapatra, Satyajit Bhate, Amit Rai, Sanjay Panda, Samiran Abraham, Priya Gupta, Nivedita Ella, Krishna Bhargava, Balram Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial |
title | Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial |
title_full | Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial |
title_fullStr | Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial |
title_short | Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial |
title_sort | safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated sars-cov-2 vaccine, bbv152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00070-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellaraches safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT reddysiddharth safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT jogdandharsh safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT sarangivamshi safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT gannerubrunda safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT prasadsai safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT dasdipankar safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT rajudugyala safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT praturiusha safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT sapkalgajanan safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT yadavpragya safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT reddyprabhakar safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT vermasavita safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT singhchandramani safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT redkarsagarvivek safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT gillurkarchandrasekhar safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT kushwahajitendrasingh safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT mohapatrasatyajit safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT bhateamit safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT raisanjay safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT pandasamiran safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT abrahampriya safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT guptanivedita safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT ellakrishna safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT bhargavabalram safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial AT vadrevukrishnamohan safetyandimmunogenicityofaninactivatedsarscov2vaccinebbv152interimresultsfromadoubleblindrandomisedmulticentrephase2trialand3monthfollowupofadoubleblindrandomisedphase1trial |