Cargando…
Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review
BACKGROUND: Covid-status certification – certificates for those who test negative for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, test positive for antibodies, or who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – has been proposed to enable safer access to a range of activities. Realising these benefits will depend in part u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0 |
_version_ | 1783711393961213952 |
---|---|
author | Drury, John Mao, Guanlan John, Ann Kamal, Atiya Rubin, G. James Stott, Clifford Vandrevala, Tushna Marteau, Theresa M. |
author_facet | Drury, John Mao, Guanlan John, Ann Kamal, Atiya Rubin, G. James Stott, Clifford Vandrevala, Tushna Marteau, Theresa M. |
author_sort | Drury, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Covid-status certification – certificates for those who test negative for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, test positive for antibodies, or who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – has been proposed to enable safer access to a range of activities. Realising these benefits will depend in part upon the behavioural and social impacts of certification. The aim of this rapid review was to describe public attitudes towards certification, and its possible impact on uptake of testing and vaccination, protective behaviours, and crime. METHOD: A search was undertaken in peer-reviewed databases, pre-print databases, and the grey literature, from 2000 to December 2020. Studies were included if they measured attitudes towards or behavioural consequences of health certificates based on one of three indices of Covid-19 status: test-negative result for current infectiousness, test-positive for antibodies conferring natural immunity, or vaccination(s) conferring immunity. RESULTS: Thirty-three papers met the inclusion criteria, only three of which were rated as low risk of bias. Public attitudes were generally favourable towards the use of immunity certificates for international travel, but unfavourable towards their use for access to work and other activities. A significant minority was strongly opposed to the use of certificates of immunity for any purpose. The limited evidence suggested that intention to get vaccinated varied with the activity enabled by certification or vaccination (e.g., international travel). Where vaccination is seen as compulsory this could lead to unwillingness to accept a subsequent vaccination. There was some evidence that restricting access to settings and activities to those with antibody test certificates may lead to deliberate exposure to infection in a minority. Behaviours that reduce transmission may decrease upon health certificates based on any of the three indices of Covid-19 status, including physical distancing and handwashing. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence suggests that health certification in relation to COVID-19 – outside of the context of international travel – has the potential for harm as well as benefit. Realising the benefits while minimising the harms will require real-time evaluations allowing modifications to maximise the potential contribution of certification to enable safer access to a range of activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8221819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82218192021-06-24 Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review Drury, John Mao, Guanlan John, Ann Kamal, Atiya Rubin, G. James Stott, Clifford Vandrevala, Tushna Marteau, Theresa M. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Covid-status certification – certificates for those who test negative for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, test positive for antibodies, or who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – has been proposed to enable safer access to a range of activities. Realising these benefits will depend in part upon the behavioural and social impacts of certification. The aim of this rapid review was to describe public attitudes towards certification, and its possible impact on uptake of testing and vaccination, protective behaviours, and crime. METHOD: A search was undertaken in peer-reviewed databases, pre-print databases, and the grey literature, from 2000 to December 2020. Studies were included if they measured attitudes towards or behavioural consequences of health certificates based on one of three indices of Covid-19 status: test-negative result for current infectiousness, test-positive for antibodies conferring natural immunity, or vaccination(s) conferring immunity. RESULTS: Thirty-three papers met the inclusion criteria, only three of which were rated as low risk of bias. Public attitudes were generally favourable towards the use of immunity certificates for international travel, but unfavourable towards their use for access to work and other activities. A significant minority was strongly opposed to the use of certificates of immunity for any purpose. The limited evidence suggested that intention to get vaccinated varied with the activity enabled by certification or vaccination (e.g., international travel). Where vaccination is seen as compulsory this could lead to unwillingness to accept a subsequent vaccination. There was some evidence that restricting access to settings and activities to those with antibody test certificates may lead to deliberate exposure to infection in a minority. Behaviours that reduce transmission may decrease upon health certificates based on any of the three indices of Covid-19 status, including physical distancing and handwashing. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence suggests that health certification in relation to COVID-19 – outside of the context of international travel – has the potential for harm as well as benefit. Realising the benefits while minimising the harms will require real-time evaluations allowing modifications to maximise the potential contribution of certification to enable safer access to a range of activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0. BioMed Central 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8221819/ /pubmed/34162364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Drury, John Mao, Guanlan John, Ann Kamal, Atiya Rubin, G. James Stott, Clifford Vandrevala, Tushna Marteau, Theresa M. Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review |
title | Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review |
title_full | Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review |
title_fullStr | Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review |
title_short | Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review |
title_sort | behavioural responses to covid-19 health certification: a rapid review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT druryjohn behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview AT maoguanlan behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview AT johnann behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview AT kamalatiya behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview AT rubingjames behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview AT stottclifford behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview AT vandrevalatushna behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview AT marteautheresam behaviouralresponsestocovid19healthcertificationarapidreview |