Cargando…
Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques
One of the key roles of an orthopedic surgeon treating metastatic bone disease (MBD) is fracture risk prediction. Current widely used impending fracture risk tools such as Mirels scoring lack specificity. Two newer methods of fracture risk prediction, CT-based structural rigidity analysis (CTRA) and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5591715 |
_version_ | 1783711397197119488 |
---|---|
author | Kaupp, Shannon M. Mann, Kenneth A. Miller, Mark A. Damron, Timothy A. |
author_facet | Kaupp, Shannon M. Mann, Kenneth A. Miller, Mark A. Damron, Timothy A. |
author_sort | Kaupp, Shannon M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the key roles of an orthopedic surgeon treating metastatic bone disease (MBD) is fracture risk prediction. Current widely used impending fracture risk tools such as Mirels scoring lack specificity. Two newer methods of fracture risk prediction, CT-based structural rigidity analysis (CTRA) and finite element analysis (FEA), have each been shown to be more accurate than Mirels. This case series illustrates comparative Mirels, CTRA, and FEA for 8 femurs in 7 subjects. These cases were selected from a much larger data set to portray examples of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives as defined by CTRA relative to the fracture outcome. Case illustrations demonstrate comparative Mirels and FEA. This series illustrates the use, efficacy, and limitations of these tools. As all current tools have limitations, further work is needed in refining and developing fracture risk prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8221853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82218532021-07-02 Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques Kaupp, Shannon M. Mann, Kenneth A. Miller, Mark A. Damron, Timothy A. Adv Orthop Research Article One of the key roles of an orthopedic surgeon treating metastatic bone disease (MBD) is fracture risk prediction. Current widely used impending fracture risk tools such as Mirels scoring lack specificity. Two newer methods of fracture risk prediction, CT-based structural rigidity analysis (CTRA) and finite element analysis (FEA), have each been shown to be more accurate than Mirels. This case series illustrates comparative Mirels, CTRA, and FEA for 8 femurs in 7 subjects. These cases were selected from a much larger data set to portray examples of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives as defined by CTRA relative to the fracture outcome. Case illustrations demonstrate comparative Mirels and FEA. This series illustrates the use, efficacy, and limitations of these tools. As all current tools have limitations, further work is needed in refining and developing fracture risk prediction. Hindawi 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8221853/ /pubmed/34221514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5591715 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shannon M. Kaupp et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaupp, Shannon M. Mann, Kenneth A. Miller, Mark A. Damron, Timothy A. Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques |
title | Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques |
title_full | Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques |
title_fullStr | Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques |
title_short | Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease of the Femur: A Pictorial Review Using Three Different Techniques |
title_sort | predicting fracture risk in patients with metastatic bone disease of the femur: a pictorial review using three different techniques |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5591715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kauppshannonm predictingfractureriskinpatientswithmetastaticbonediseaseofthefemurapictorialreviewusingthreedifferenttechniques AT mannkennetha predictingfractureriskinpatientswithmetastaticbonediseaseofthefemurapictorialreviewusingthreedifferenttechniques AT millermarka predictingfractureriskinpatientswithmetastaticbonediseaseofthefemurapictorialreviewusingthreedifferenttechniques AT damrontimothya predictingfractureriskinpatientswithmetastaticbonediseaseofthefemurapictorialreviewusingthreedifferenttechniques |