Cargando…

Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index

The growing implementation of digital education comes with an increased need to understand the impact of digital tools on learning. Previous behavioral studies have shown that handwriting on paper is more effective for learning than typing on a keyboard. However, the impact of writing with a digital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ihara, Aya S., Nakajima, Kae, Kake, Akiyuki, Ishimaru, Kizuku, Osugi, Kiyoyuki, Naruse, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.679191
_version_ 1783711500435718144
author Ihara, Aya S.
Nakajima, Kae
Kake, Akiyuki
Ishimaru, Kizuku
Osugi, Kiyoyuki
Naruse, Yasushi
author_facet Ihara, Aya S.
Nakajima, Kae
Kake, Akiyuki
Ishimaru, Kizuku
Osugi, Kiyoyuki
Naruse, Yasushi
author_sort Ihara, Aya S.
collection PubMed
description The growing implementation of digital education comes with an increased need to understand the impact of digital tools on learning. Previous behavioral studies have shown that handwriting on paper is more effective for learning than typing on a keyboard. However, the impact of writing with a digital pen on a tablet remains to be clarified. In the present study, we compared learning by handwriting with an ink pen on paper, handwriting with a digital pen on a tablet, and typing on a keyboard. Behavioral and electroencephalographic indices were measured immediately after learning with each writing tool. The moods of the subjects during the training were also assessed. The participants were divided according to their use of digital pen in their everyday lives, allowing us to take into account the effect of the familiarity with the digital pen on the learning process (familiar group vs. unfamiliar group). We performed an EEG experiment applying a repetition priming paradigm. In each trial, a learned foreign language word (prime word) and a mother tongue word (target word) were consecutively presented. The target word was either semantically identical to the prime word (repetitive condition) or different (non-repetitive condition). We assumed that a larger priming effect on N400 reflects larger learning progress. The familiar group showed a greater N400 priming effect for words learned with the digital or ink pen than those learned with the keyboard. The unfamiliar group showed the greater N400 priming effect for words learned with the ink pen compared with words learned by typing. In addition, positive mood during learning was significantly higher during handwriting than during typing, regardless of the groups. On the other hand, the behavioral indices were not influenced by the writing tool. These results suggest that the movements involved in handwriting allow a greater memorization of new words. The advantage of handwriting over typing might also be caused by a more positive mood during learning. Finally, our results show that handwriting with a digital pen and tablet can increase the ability to learn compared with keyboard typing once the individuals are accustomed to it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8222525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82225252021-06-25 Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index Ihara, Aya S. Nakajima, Kae Kake, Akiyuki Ishimaru, Kizuku Osugi, Kiyoyuki Naruse, Yasushi Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The growing implementation of digital education comes with an increased need to understand the impact of digital tools on learning. Previous behavioral studies have shown that handwriting on paper is more effective for learning than typing on a keyboard. However, the impact of writing with a digital pen on a tablet remains to be clarified. In the present study, we compared learning by handwriting with an ink pen on paper, handwriting with a digital pen on a tablet, and typing on a keyboard. Behavioral and electroencephalographic indices were measured immediately after learning with each writing tool. The moods of the subjects during the training were also assessed. The participants were divided according to their use of digital pen in their everyday lives, allowing us to take into account the effect of the familiarity with the digital pen on the learning process (familiar group vs. unfamiliar group). We performed an EEG experiment applying a repetition priming paradigm. In each trial, a learned foreign language word (prime word) and a mother tongue word (target word) were consecutively presented. The target word was either semantically identical to the prime word (repetitive condition) or different (non-repetitive condition). We assumed that a larger priming effect on N400 reflects larger learning progress. The familiar group showed a greater N400 priming effect for words learned with the digital or ink pen than those learned with the keyboard. The unfamiliar group showed the greater N400 priming effect for words learned with the ink pen compared with words learned by typing. In addition, positive mood during learning was significantly higher during handwriting than during typing, regardless of the groups. On the other hand, the behavioral indices were not influenced by the writing tool. These results suggest that the movements involved in handwriting allow a greater memorization of new words. The advantage of handwriting over typing might also be caused by a more positive mood during learning. Finally, our results show that handwriting with a digital pen and tablet can increase the ability to learn compared with keyboard typing once the individuals are accustomed to it. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8222525/ /pubmed/34177498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.679191 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ihara, Nakajima, Kake, Ishimaru, Osugi and Naruse. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ihara, Aya S.
Nakajima, Kae
Kake, Akiyuki
Ishimaru, Kizuku
Osugi, Kiyoyuki
Naruse, Yasushi
Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index
title Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index
title_full Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index
title_fullStr Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index
title_full_unstemmed Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index
title_short Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index
title_sort advantage of handwriting over typing on learning words: evidence from an n400 event-related potential index
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.679191
work_keys_str_mv AT iharaayas advantageofhandwritingovertypingonlearningwordsevidencefromann400eventrelatedpotentialindex
AT nakajimakae advantageofhandwritingovertypingonlearningwordsevidencefromann400eventrelatedpotentialindex
AT kakeakiyuki advantageofhandwritingovertypingonlearningwordsevidencefromann400eventrelatedpotentialindex
AT ishimarukizuku advantageofhandwritingovertypingonlearningwordsevidencefromann400eventrelatedpotentialindex
AT osugikiyoyuki advantageofhandwritingovertypingonlearningwordsevidencefromann400eventrelatedpotentialindex
AT naruseyasushi advantageofhandwritingovertypingonlearningwordsevidencefromann400eventrelatedpotentialindex