Cargando…

Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots

Given that selection removes genetic variance from evolving populations, thereby reducing exploration opportunities, it is important to find mechanisms that create genetic variation without the disruption of adapted genes and genomes caused by random mutation. Just such an alternative is offered by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawthorne-Madell, Joshua, Aaron, Eric, Livingston, Ken, Long, John H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.674823
_version_ 1783711512482807808
author Hawthorne-Madell, Joshua
Aaron, Eric
Livingston, Ken
Long, John H.
author_facet Hawthorne-Madell, Joshua
Aaron, Eric
Livingston, Ken
Long, John H.
author_sort Hawthorne-Madell, Joshua
collection PubMed
description Given that selection removes genetic variance from evolving populations, thereby reducing exploration opportunities, it is important to find mechanisms that create genetic variation without the disruption of adapted genes and genomes caused by random mutation. Just such an alternative is offered by random epigenetic error, a developmental process that acts on materials and parts expressed by the genome. In this system of embodied computational evolution, simulated within a physics engine, epigenetic error was instantiated in an explicit genotype-to-phenotype map as transcription error at the initiation of gene expression. The hypothesis was that transcription error would create genetic variance by shielding genes from the direct impact of selection, creating, in the process, masquerading genomes. To test this hypothesis, populations of simulated embodied biorobots and their developmental systems were evolved under steady directional selection as equivalent rates of random mutation and random transcriptional error were covaried systematically in an 11 × 11 fully factorial experimental design. In each of the 121 different experimental conditions (unique combinations of mutation and transcription error), the same set of 10 randomly created replicate populations of 60 individuals were evolved. Selection for the improved locomotor behavior of individuals led to increased mean fitness of populations over 100 generations at nearly all levels and combinations of mutation and transcription error. When the effects of both types of error were partitioned statistically, increasing transcription error was shown to increase the final genetic variance of populations, incurring a fitness cost but acting on variance independently and differently from genetic mutation. Thus, random epigenetic errors in development feed back through selection of individuals with masquerading genomes to the population’s genetic variance over generational time. Random developmental processes offer an additional mechanism for exploration by increasing genetic variation in the face of steady, directional selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8222576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82225762021-06-25 Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots Hawthorne-Madell, Joshua Aaron, Eric Livingston, Ken Long, John H. Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Given that selection removes genetic variance from evolving populations, thereby reducing exploration opportunities, it is important to find mechanisms that create genetic variation without the disruption of adapted genes and genomes caused by random mutation. Just such an alternative is offered by random epigenetic error, a developmental process that acts on materials and parts expressed by the genome. In this system of embodied computational evolution, simulated within a physics engine, epigenetic error was instantiated in an explicit genotype-to-phenotype map as transcription error at the initiation of gene expression. The hypothesis was that transcription error would create genetic variance by shielding genes from the direct impact of selection, creating, in the process, masquerading genomes. To test this hypothesis, populations of simulated embodied biorobots and their developmental systems were evolved under steady directional selection as equivalent rates of random mutation and random transcriptional error were covaried systematically in an 11 × 11 fully factorial experimental design. In each of the 121 different experimental conditions (unique combinations of mutation and transcription error), the same set of 10 randomly created replicate populations of 60 individuals were evolved. Selection for the improved locomotor behavior of individuals led to increased mean fitness of populations over 100 generations at nearly all levels and combinations of mutation and transcription error. When the effects of both types of error were partitioned statistically, increasing transcription error was shown to increase the final genetic variance of populations, incurring a fitness cost but acting on variance independently and differently from genetic mutation. Thus, random epigenetic errors in development feed back through selection of individuals with masquerading genomes to the population’s genetic variance over generational time. Random developmental processes offer an additional mechanism for exploration by increasing genetic variation in the face of steady, directional selection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8222576/ /pubmed/34179109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.674823 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hawthorne-Madell, Aaron, Livingston and Long. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Robotics and AI
Hawthorne-Madell, Joshua
Aaron, Eric
Livingston, Ken
Long, John H.
Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots
title Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots
title_full Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots
title_fullStr Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots
title_full_unstemmed Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots
title_short Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots
title_sort embodied computational evolution: feedback between development and evolution in simulated biorobots
topic Robotics and AI
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.674823
work_keys_str_mv AT hawthornemadelljoshua embodiedcomputationalevolutionfeedbackbetweendevelopmentandevolutioninsimulatedbiorobots
AT aaroneric embodiedcomputationalevolutionfeedbackbetweendevelopmentandevolutioninsimulatedbiorobots
AT livingstonken embodiedcomputationalevolutionfeedbackbetweendevelopmentandevolutioninsimulatedbiorobots
AT longjohnh embodiedcomputationalevolutionfeedbackbetweendevelopmentandevolutioninsimulatedbiorobots