Cargando…
No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study
INTRODUCTION: Partial driving automation is not always reliable and requires that drivers maintain readiness to take over control and manually operate the vehicle. Little is known about differences in drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands under partial automation and how it may make it difficult fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.577418 |
_version_ | 1783711513171722240 |
---|---|
author | Lohani, Monika Cooper, Joel M. Erickson, Gus G. Simmons, Trent G. McDonnell, Amy S. Carriero, Amanda E. Crabtree, Kaedyn W. Strayer, David L. |
author_facet | Lohani, Monika Cooper, Joel M. Erickson, Gus G. Simmons, Trent G. McDonnell, Amy S. Carriero, Amanda E. Crabtree, Kaedyn W. Strayer, David L. |
author_sort | Lohani, Monika |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Partial driving automation is not always reliable and requires that drivers maintain readiness to take over control and manually operate the vehicle. Little is known about differences in drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands under partial automation and how it may make it difficult for drivers to transition from automated to manual modes. This research examined whether there are differences in drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands during manual versus partial automation driving. METHOD: We compared arousal (using heart rate) and cognitive demands (using the root mean square of successive differences in normal heartbeats; RMSSD, and Detection Response Task; DRT) while 39 younger (M = 28.82 years) and 32 late-middle-aged (M = 52.72 years) participants drove four partially automated vehicles (Cadillac, Nissan Rogue, Tesla, and Volvo) on interstate highways. If compared to manual driving, drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands were different under partial automation, then corresponding differences in heart rate, RMSSD, and DRT would be expected. Alternatively, if drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands were similar in manual and partially automated driving, no difference in the two driving modes would be expected. RESULTS: Results suggest no significant differences in heart rate, RMSSD, or DRT reaction time performance between manual and partially automated modes of driving for either younger or late-middle-aged adults across the four test vehicles. A Bayes Factor analysis suggested that heart rate, RMSSD, and DRT data showed extreme evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. CONCLUSION: This novel study conducted on real roads with a representative sample provides important evidence of no difference in arousal and cognitive demands. Younger and late-middle-aged motorists who are new to partial automation are able to maintain arousal and cognitive demands comparable to manual driving while using the partially automated technology. Drivers who are more experienced with partially automated technology may respond differently than those with limited prior experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8222579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82225792021-06-25 No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study Lohani, Monika Cooper, Joel M. Erickson, Gus G. Simmons, Trent G. McDonnell, Amy S. Carriero, Amanda E. Crabtree, Kaedyn W. Strayer, David L. Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Partial driving automation is not always reliable and requires that drivers maintain readiness to take over control and manually operate the vehicle. Little is known about differences in drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands under partial automation and how it may make it difficult for drivers to transition from automated to manual modes. This research examined whether there are differences in drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands during manual versus partial automation driving. METHOD: We compared arousal (using heart rate) and cognitive demands (using the root mean square of successive differences in normal heartbeats; RMSSD, and Detection Response Task; DRT) while 39 younger (M = 28.82 years) and 32 late-middle-aged (M = 52.72 years) participants drove four partially automated vehicles (Cadillac, Nissan Rogue, Tesla, and Volvo) on interstate highways. If compared to manual driving, drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands were different under partial automation, then corresponding differences in heart rate, RMSSD, and DRT would be expected. Alternatively, if drivers’ arousal and cognitive demands were similar in manual and partially automated driving, no difference in the two driving modes would be expected. RESULTS: Results suggest no significant differences in heart rate, RMSSD, or DRT reaction time performance between manual and partially automated modes of driving for either younger or late-middle-aged adults across the four test vehicles. A Bayes Factor analysis suggested that heart rate, RMSSD, and DRT data showed extreme evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. CONCLUSION: This novel study conducted on real roads with a representative sample provides important evidence of no difference in arousal and cognitive demands. Younger and late-middle-aged motorists who are new to partial automation are able to maintain arousal and cognitive demands comparable to manual driving while using the partially automated technology. Drivers who are more experienced with partially automated technology may respond differently than those with limited prior experience. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8222579/ /pubmed/34177439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.577418 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lohani, Cooper, Erickson, Simmons, McDonnell, Carriero, Crabtree and Strayer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Lohani, Monika Cooper, Joel M. Erickson, Gus G. Simmons, Trent G. McDonnell, Amy S. Carriero, Amanda E. Crabtree, Kaedyn W. Strayer, David L. No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study |
title | No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study |
title_full | No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study |
title_fullStr | No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study |
title_full_unstemmed | No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study |
title_short | No Difference in Arousal or Cognitive Demands Between Manual and Partially Automated Driving: A Multi-Method On-Road Study |
title_sort | no difference in arousal or cognitive demands between manual and partially automated driving: a multi-method on-road study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8222579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.577418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lohanimonika nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy AT cooperjoelm nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy AT ericksongusg nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy AT simmonstrentg nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy AT mcdonnellamys nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy AT carrieroamandae nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy AT crabtreekaedynw nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy AT strayerdavidl nodifferenceinarousalorcognitivedemandsbetweenmanualandpartiallyautomateddrivingamultimethodonroadstudy |