Cargando…
The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe
The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic presented a novel challenge to monitoring and evaluation in the humanitarian and development sectors. The measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 disrupted the traditional way of doing business in both the programming and monitoring and evaluat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07386 |
_version_ | 1783711608127619072 |
---|---|
author | Dube, Thulani Ncube, Siphilisiwe B. Mlotshwa, Simon Matsika, Getrude N. Maonde, Nelly |
author_facet | Dube, Thulani Ncube, Siphilisiwe B. Mlotshwa, Simon Matsika, Getrude N. Maonde, Nelly |
author_sort | Dube, Thulani |
collection | PubMed |
description | The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic presented a novel challenge to monitoring and evaluation in the humanitarian and development sectors. The measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 disrupted the traditional way of doing business in both the programming and monitoring and evaluation sectors. In particular, restrictions on movement in order to reduce the spread of the virus meant that monitoring and evaluation work had to transform from the traditional approaches. This study sought to investigate how monitoring and evaluation practice has evolved under the COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe. The main objective of the study was to document lessons learned from different organisations and practitioners and to share best practice. The study deployed an online survey using Kobotoolbox and reached 171 respondents. A Webinar session with six presentations and discussions with programming, monitoring and evaluation practitioners in Zimbabwe was held to share experiences and lessons learned. This was followed up by key informant interviews with selected stakeholders. The study revealed a general shift from conventional monitoring and evaluation to COVID-19 tailored approaches which include deprioritisation of face to face data collection and increased remote data collection mechanisms, maximum utilisation of secondary data, limiting data collection to essential and critical data, simplifying the data collection methods and, rethinking sampling designs to promote inclusion. The study makes several recommendations for best practice and learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8223022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82230222021-06-25 The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe Dube, Thulani Ncube, Siphilisiwe B. Mlotshwa, Simon Matsika, Getrude N. Maonde, Nelly Heliyon Research Article The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic presented a novel challenge to monitoring and evaluation in the humanitarian and development sectors. The measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 disrupted the traditional way of doing business in both the programming and monitoring and evaluation sectors. In particular, restrictions on movement in order to reduce the spread of the virus meant that monitoring and evaluation work had to transform from the traditional approaches. This study sought to investigate how monitoring and evaluation practice has evolved under the COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe. The main objective of the study was to document lessons learned from different organisations and practitioners and to share best practice. The study deployed an online survey using Kobotoolbox and reached 171 respondents. A Webinar session with six presentations and discussions with programming, monitoring and evaluation practitioners in Zimbabwe was held to share experiences and lessons learned. This was followed up by key informant interviews with selected stakeholders. The study revealed a general shift from conventional monitoring and evaluation to COVID-19 tailored approaches which include deprioritisation of face to face data collection and increased remote data collection mechanisms, maximum utilisation of secondary data, limiting data collection to essential and critical data, simplifying the data collection methods and, rethinking sampling designs to promote inclusion. The study makes several recommendations for best practice and learning. Elsevier 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8223022/ /pubmed/34189334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07386 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dube, Thulani Ncube, Siphilisiwe B. Mlotshwa, Simon Matsika, Getrude N. Maonde, Nelly The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe |
title | The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe |
title_full | The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe |
title_fullStr | The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe |
title_full_unstemmed | The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe |
title_short | The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe |
title_sort | changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of covid-19: practitioners’ field experiences from zimbabwe |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dubethulani thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT ncubesiphilisiweb thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT mlotshwasimon thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT matsikagetruden thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT maondenelly thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT dubethulani changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT ncubesiphilisiweb changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT mlotshwasimon changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT matsikagetruden changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe AT maondenelly changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe |