Cargando…

The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe

The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic presented a novel challenge to monitoring and evaluation in the humanitarian and development sectors. The measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 disrupted the traditional way of doing business in both the programming and monitoring and evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dube, Thulani, Ncube, Siphilisiwe B., Mlotshwa, Simon, Matsika, Getrude N., Maonde, Nelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07386
_version_ 1783711608127619072
author Dube, Thulani
Ncube, Siphilisiwe B.
Mlotshwa, Simon
Matsika, Getrude N.
Maonde, Nelly
author_facet Dube, Thulani
Ncube, Siphilisiwe B.
Mlotshwa, Simon
Matsika, Getrude N.
Maonde, Nelly
author_sort Dube, Thulani
collection PubMed
description The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic presented a novel challenge to monitoring and evaluation in the humanitarian and development sectors. The measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 disrupted the traditional way of doing business in both the programming and monitoring and evaluation sectors. In particular, restrictions on movement in order to reduce the spread of the virus meant that monitoring and evaluation work had to transform from the traditional approaches. This study sought to investigate how monitoring and evaluation practice has evolved under the COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe. The main objective of the study was to document lessons learned from different organisations and practitioners and to share best practice. The study deployed an online survey using Kobotoolbox and reached 171 respondents. A Webinar session with six presentations and discussions with programming, monitoring and evaluation practitioners in Zimbabwe was held to share experiences and lessons learned. This was followed up by key informant interviews with selected stakeholders. The study revealed a general shift from conventional monitoring and evaluation to COVID-19 tailored approaches which include deprioritisation of face to face data collection and increased remote data collection mechanisms, maximum utilisation of secondary data, limiting data collection to essential and critical data, simplifying the data collection methods and, rethinking sampling designs to promote inclusion. The study makes several recommendations for best practice and learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8223022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82230222021-06-25 The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe Dube, Thulani Ncube, Siphilisiwe B. Mlotshwa, Simon Matsika, Getrude N. Maonde, Nelly Heliyon Research Article The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic presented a novel challenge to monitoring and evaluation in the humanitarian and development sectors. The measures taken to contain the spread of COVID-19 disrupted the traditional way of doing business in both the programming and monitoring and evaluation sectors. In particular, restrictions on movement in order to reduce the spread of the virus meant that monitoring and evaluation work had to transform from the traditional approaches. This study sought to investigate how monitoring and evaluation practice has evolved under the COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe. The main objective of the study was to document lessons learned from different organisations and practitioners and to share best practice. The study deployed an online survey using Kobotoolbox and reached 171 respondents. A Webinar session with six presentations and discussions with programming, monitoring and evaluation practitioners in Zimbabwe was held to share experiences and lessons learned. This was followed up by key informant interviews with selected stakeholders. The study revealed a general shift from conventional monitoring and evaluation to COVID-19 tailored approaches which include deprioritisation of face to face data collection and increased remote data collection mechanisms, maximum utilisation of secondary data, limiting data collection to essential and critical data, simplifying the data collection methods and, rethinking sampling designs to promote inclusion. The study makes several recommendations for best practice and learning. Elsevier 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8223022/ /pubmed/34189334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07386 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Dube, Thulani
Ncube, Siphilisiwe B.
Mlotshwa, Simon
Matsika, Getrude N.
Maonde, Nelly
The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe
title The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe
title_full The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe
title_fullStr The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe
title_short The changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of COVID-19: practitioners’ field experiences from Zimbabwe
title_sort changing face of monitoring and evaluation in the age of covid-19: practitioners’ field experiences from zimbabwe
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07386
work_keys_str_mv AT dubethulani thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT ncubesiphilisiweb thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT mlotshwasimon thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT matsikagetruden thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT maondenelly thechangingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT dubethulani changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT ncubesiphilisiweb changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT mlotshwasimon changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT matsikagetruden changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe
AT maondenelly changingfaceofmonitoringandevaluationintheageofcovid19practitionersfieldexperiencesfromzimbabwe