Cargando…
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease
BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold-standard for detecting vascular calcification. Radial volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (radial-VIBE), a free-breathing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00769-6 |
_version_ | 1783711681276280832 |
---|---|
author | Edy, Elbert Rankin, Alastair J. Lees, Jennifer S. Barrientos, Pauline Hall Woodward, Rosemary Stoumpos, Sokratis Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Mark, Patrick B. Roditi, Giles H. |
author_facet | Edy, Elbert Rankin, Alastair J. Lees, Jennifer S. Barrientos, Pauline Hall Woodward, Rosemary Stoumpos, Sokratis Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Mark, Patrick B. Roditi, Giles H. |
author_sort | Edy, Elbert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold-standard for detecting vascular calcification. Radial volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (radial-VIBE), a free-breathing gradient-echo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) sequence, has advantages over CT as it is ionising radiation-free. However, its capability in detecting thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) has not been investigated. This study aims to compare radial-VIBE to CT for the detection of TAC in the descending aorta of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using semi-automated methods, and to investigate the association between TAC and coronary artery calcification (CAC). METHODS: Paired cardiac CT and radial-VIBE CMR scans from ESRD patients participating in 2 prospective studies were obtained. Calcification volume was quantified using semi-automated methods in a 9 cm segment of the thoracic aorta. Correlation and agreement between TAC volume measured on CMR and CT were assessed with Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ), linear regression, Bland–Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Association between CAC Agatston score and TAC volume determined by CT and CMR was measured with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Scans from 96 participants were analysed. Positive correlation was found between CMR and CT calcification volume [ρ = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.73]. ICC for consistency was 0.537 (95% CI 0.378–0.665). Bland–Altman plot revealed that compared to CT, CMR volumes were systematically higher at low calcification volume, and lower at high calcification volume. CT did not detect calcification in 41.7% of participants, while radial-VIBE CMR detected signal which the semi-quantitative algorithm reported as calcification in all of those individuals. Instances of suboptimal radial-VIBE CMR image quality were deemed to be the major contributors to the discrepancy. Correlations between CAC Agatston score and TAC volume measured by CT and CMR were ρ = 0.404 (95% CI 0.214–0.565) and ρ = 0.211 (95% CI 0.008–0.396), respectively. CONCLUSION: Radial-VIBE CMR can detect TAC with strong positive association to CT, albeit with the presence of proportional bias. Quantification of vascular calcification by radial-VIBE remains a promising area for future research, but improvements in image quality are necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-021-00769-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8223384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82233842021-06-25 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease Edy, Elbert Rankin, Alastair J. Lees, Jennifer S. Barrientos, Pauline Hall Woodward, Rosemary Stoumpos, Sokratis Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Mark, Patrick B. Roditi, Giles H. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold-standard for detecting vascular calcification. Radial volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (radial-VIBE), a free-breathing gradient-echo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) sequence, has advantages over CT as it is ionising radiation-free. However, its capability in detecting thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) has not been investigated. This study aims to compare radial-VIBE to CT for the detection of TAC in the descending aorta of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) using semi-automated methods, and to investigate the association between TAC and coronary artery calcification (CAC). METHODS: Paired cardiac CT and radial-VIBE CMR scans from ESRD patients participating in 2 prospective studies were obtained. Calcification volume was quantified using semi-automated methods in a 9 cm segment of the thoracic aorta. Correlation and agreement between TAC volume measured on CMR and CT were assessed with Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ), linear regression, Bland–Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Association between CAC Agatston score and TAC volume determined by CT and CMR was measured with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Scans from 96 participants were analysed. Positive correlation was found between CMR and CT calcification volume [ρ = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.73]. ICC for consistency was 0.537 (95% CI 0.378–0.665). Bland–Altman plot revealed that compared to CT, CMR volumes were systematically higher at low calcification volume, and lower at high calcification volume. CT did not detect calcification in 41.7% of participants, while radial-VIBE CMR detected signal which the semi-quantitative algorithm reported as calcification in all of those individuals. Instances of suboptimal radial-VIBE CMR image quality were deemed to be the major contributors to the discrepancy. Correlations between CAC Agatston score and TAC volume measured by CT and CMR were ρ = 0.404 (95% CI 0.214–0.565) and ρ = 0.211 (95% CI 0.008–0.396), respectively. CONCLUSION: Radial-VIBE CMR can detect TAC with strong positive association to CT, albeit with the presence of proportional bias. Quantification of vascular calcification by radial-VIBE remains a promising area for future research, but improvements in image quality are necessary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-021-00769-6. BioMed Central 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8223384/ /pubmed/34162405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00769-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Edy, Elbert Rankin, Alastair J. Lees, Jennifer S. Barrientos, Pauline Hall Woodward, Rosemary Stoumpos, Sokratis Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Radjenovic, Aleksandra Mark, Patrick B. Roditi, Giles H. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease |
title | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease |
title_full | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease |
title_fullStr | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease |
title_short | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease |
title_sort | cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of descending thoracic aorta calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34162405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00769-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edyelbert cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT rankinalastairj cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT leesjennifers cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT barrientospaulinehall cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT woodwardrosemary cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT stoumpossokratis cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT koktzoglouioannis cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT edelmanrobertr cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT radjenovicaleksandra cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT markpatrickb cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease AT roditigilesh cardiovascularmagneticresonanceforthedetectionofdescendingthoracicaortacalcificationinpatientswithendstagerenaldisease |