Cargando…

Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study

There is little empirical data on the absolute benefit of cervical screening between ages 60-64y on subsequent cancer risk. We estimate the incidence of cervical cancer up to age 84y in women with and without a cervical cytology test at age 60-64y, by screening histories aged 50-59y. The current stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castanon, Alejandra, Green, Leonardo I., Sasieni, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106625
_version_ 1783711707577712640
author Castanon, Alejandra
Green, Leonardo I.
Sasieni, Peter
author_facet Castanon, Alejandra
Green, Leonardo I.
Sasieni, Peter
author_sort Castanon, Alejandra
collection PubMed
description There is little empirical data on the absolute benefit of cervical screening between ages 60-64y on subsequent cancer risk. We estimate the incidence of cervical cancer up to age 84y in women with and without a cervical cytology test at age 60-64y, by screening histories aged 50-59y. The current study is a population based case-control study of women born between 1928 and 1956 and aged 60-84y between 2007 and 2018. We included all such women diagnosed with cervical cancer in England and an aged-matched random sample without cancer. Women with a hysterectomy were excluded. Exposure was cervical cytology between ages 50–64y. The main outcome was 25y cumulative risk of cervical cancer between ages 60-84y. We found that eight in every 1000 (8.40, 95%CI: 7.78 to 9.07) women without a screening test between age 50‐64y develop cervical cancer between the ages of 60-84y. The risk is half: 3.46 per 1000 (95%CI: 2.75 to 4.36) among women with a test between age 60-64y but no cervical screening test at age 50-59y. The absolute difference in risk is equivalent to one fewer cancer for every 202 such women screened. The highest risk (10.01, 95%CI:6.70 to 14.95) was among women with abnormal screening at ages 50-59y and no tests 60-64y. 25y risk among women with a screening test every five years between age 50–64y was just under two in a 1000 (1.59, 95%CI:1.42 to 1.78). Results suggest the upper age of screening should be dependent on previous screening participation and results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8223500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82235002021-08-01 Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study Castanon, Alejandra Green, Leonardo I. Sasieni, Peter Prev Med Article There is little empirical data on the absolute benefit of cervical screening between ages 60-64y on subsequent cancer risk. We estimate the incidence of cervical cancer up to age 84y in women with and without a cervical cytology test at age 60-64y, by screening histories aged 50-59y. The current study is a population based case-control study of women born between 1928 and 1956 and aged 60-84y between 2007 and 2018. We included all such women diagnosed with cervical cancer in England and an aged-matched random sample without cancer. Women with a hysterectomy were excluded. Exposure was cervical cytology between ages 50–64y. The main outcome was 25y cumulative risk of cervical cancer between ages 60-84y. We found that eight in every 1000 (8.40, 95%CI: 7.78 to 9.07) women without a screening test between age 50‐64y develop cervical cancer between the ages of 60-84y. The risk is half: 3.46 per 1000 (95%CI: 2.75 to 4.36) among women with a test between age 60-64y but no cervical screening test at age 50-59y. The absolute difference in risk is equivalent to one fewer cancer for every 202 such women screened. The highest risk (10.01, 95%CI:6.70 to 14.95) was among women with abnormal screening at ages 50-59y and no tests 60-64y. 25y risk among women with a screening test every five years between age 50–64y was just under two in a 1000 (1.59, 95%CI:1.42 to 1.78). Results suggest the upper age of screening should be dependent on previous screening participation and results. Academic Press 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8223500/ /pubmed/34019928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106625 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Castanon, Alejandra
Green, Leonardo I.
Sasieni, Peter
Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study
title Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study
title_full Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study
title_fullStr Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study
title_short Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study
title_sort impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: a population-based case-control study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106625
work_keys_str_mv AT castanonalejandra impactofscreeningbetweentheagesof60and64oncumulativeratesofcervicalcancertoage84ybyscreeninghistoryatages50to59apopulationbasedcasecontrolstudy
AT greenleonardoi impactofscreeningbetweentheagesof60and64oncumulativeratesofcervicalcancertoage84ybyscreeninghistoryatages50to59apopulationbasedcasecontrolstudy
AT sasienipeter impactofscreeningbetweentheagesof60and64oncumulativeratesofcervicalcancertoage84ybyscreeninghistoryatages50to59apopulationbasedcasecontrolstudy