Cargando…

Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up

PURPOSE: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry (FESCE) enables in-bed leg exercise independently of patients’ volition. We hypothesised that early use of FESCE-based progressive mobility programme improves physical function in survivors of critical care after 6 months. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waldauf, Petr, Hrušková, Natália, Blahutova, Barbora, Gojda, Jan, Urban, Tomáš, Krajčová, Adéla, Fric, Michal, Jiroutková, Kateřina, Řasová, Kamila, Duška, František
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215755
_version_ 1783711736450252800
author Waldauf, Petr
Hrušková, Natália
Blahutova, Barbora
Gojda, Jan
Urban, Tomáš
Krajčová, Adéla
Fric, Michal
Jiroutková, Kateřina
Řasová, Kamila
Duška, František
author_facet Waldauf, Petr
Hrušková, Natália
Blahutova, Barbora
Gojda, Jan
Urban, Tomáš
Krajčová, Adéla
Fric, Michal
Jiroutková, Kateřina
Řasová, Kamila
Duška, František
author_sort Waldauf, Petr
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry (FESCE) enables in-bed leg exercise independently of patients’ volition. We hypothesised that early use of FESCE-based progressive mobility programme improves physical function in survivors of critical care after 6 months. METHODS: We enrolled mechanically ventilated adults estimated to need >7 days of intensive care unit (ICU) stay into an assessor-blinded single centre randomised controlled trial to receive either FESCE-based protocolised or standard rehabilitation that continued up to day 28 or ICU discharge. RESULTS: We randomised in 1:1 ratio 150 patients (age 61±15 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 21±7) at a median of 21 (IQR 19–43) hours after admission to ICU. Mean rehabilitation duration of rehabilitation delivered to intervention versus control group was 82 (IQR 66–97) versus 53 (IQR 50–57) min per treatment day, p<0.001. At 6 months 42 (56%) and 46 (61%) patients in interventional and control groups, respectively, were alive and available to follow-up (81.5% of prespecified sample size). Their Physical Component Summary of SF-36 (primary outcome) was not different at 6 months (50 (IQR 21–69) vs 49 (IQR 26–77); p=0.26). At ICU discharge, there were no differences in the ICU length of stay, functional performance, rectus femoris cross-sectional diameter or muscle power despite the daily nitrogen balance was being 0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.0; p=0.004) gN/m(2) less negative in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Early delivery of FESCE-based protocolised rehabilitation to ICU patients does not improve physical functioning at 6 months in survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02864745.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8223653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82236532021-07-09 Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up Waldauf, Petr Hrušková, Natália Blahutova, Barbora Gojda, Jan Urban, Tomáš Krajčová, Adéla Fric, Michal Jiroutková, Kateřina Řasová, Kamila Duška, František Thorax Critical Care PURPOSE: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry (FESCE) enables in-bed leg exercise independently of patients’ volition. We hypothesised that early use of FESCE-based progressive mobility programme improves physical function in survivors of critical care after 6 months. METHODS: We enrolled mechanically ventilated adults estimated to need >7 days of intensive care unit (ICU) stay into an assessor-blinded single centre randomised controlled trial to receive either FESCE-based protocolised or standard rehabilitation that continued up to day 28 or ICU discharge. RESULTS: We randomised in 1:1 ratio 150 patients (age 61±15 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 21±7) at a median of 21 (IQR 19–43) hours after admission to ICU. Mean rehabilitation duration of rehabilitation delivered to intervention versus control group was 82 (IQR 66–97) versus 53 (IQR 50–57) min per treatment day, p<0.001. At 6 months 42 (56%) and 46 (61%) patients in interventional and control groups, respectively, were alive and available to follow-up (81.5% of prespecified sample size). Their Physical Component Summary of SF-36 (primary outcome) was not different at 6 months (50 (IQR 21–69) vs 49 (IQR 26–77); p=0.26). At ICU discharge, there were no differences in the ICU length of stay, functional performance, rectus femoris cross-sectional diameter or muscle power despite the daily nitrogen balance was being 0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.0; p=0.004) gN/m(2) less negative in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Early delivery of FESCE-based protocolised rehabilitation to ICU patients does not improve physical functioning at 6 months in survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02864745. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8223653/ /pubmed/33931570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215755 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Critical Care
Waldauf, Petr
Hrušková, Natália
Blahutova, Barbora
Gojda, Jan
Urban, Tomáš
Krajčová, Adéla
Fric, Michal
Jiroutková, Kateřina
Řasová, Kamila
Duška, František
Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up
title Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up
title_full Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up
title_fullStr Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up
title_short Functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up
title_sort functional electrical stimulation‐assisted cycle ergometry-based progressive mobility programme for mechanically ventilated patients: randomised controlled trial with 6 months follow-up
topic Critical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215755
work_keys_str_mv AT waldaufpetr functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT hruskovanatalia functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT blahutovabarbora functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT gojdajan functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT urbantomas functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT krajcovaadela functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT fricmichal functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT jiroutkovakaterina functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT rasovakamila functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup
AT duskafrantisek functionalelectricalstimulationassistedcycleergometrybasedprogressivemobilityprogrammeformechanicallyventilatedpatientsrandomisedcontrolledtrialwith6monthsfollowup