Cargando…

2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic approach for right colectomy have been well established. However, the technical difficulty to construct the intra-corporeal anastomosis is still cumbersome. AIM: To analyze the results of 3D and 2D laparoscopic right colectomy and to compare it to the publish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Gianluca, Fransvea, Pietro, Lepre, Luca, Rondelli, Fabio, Costa, Alessandro, Campanelli, Michela, Lisi, Giorgio, Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria, Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo, Garbarino, Giovanni Maria, Ceccarelli, Graziano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194617
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.597
_version_ 1783711748222615552
author Costa, Gianluca
Fransvea, Pietro
Lepre, Luca
Rondelli, Fabio
Costa, Alessandro
Campanelli, Michela
Lisi, Giorgio
Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo
Garbarino, Giovanni Maria
Ceccarelli, Graziano
author_facet Costa, Gianluca
Fransvea, Pietro
Lepre, Luca
Rondelli, Fabio
Costa, Alessandro
Campanelli, Michela
Lisi, Giorgio
Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo
Garbarino, Giovanni Maria
Ceccarelli, Graziano
author_sort Costa, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic approach for right colectomy have been well established. However, the technical difficulty to construct the intra-corporeal anastomosis is still cumbersome. AIM: To analyze the results of 3D and 2D laparoscopic right colectomy and to compare it to the published series through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomy at Umbria2 Hospitals from January 2014 to March 2020 was performed. A systematic review was accomplished comparing 2D and 3D right colectomy. RESULTS: In the personal series 47 patients of the 2D group were matched to 47 patients of the 3D group. The 3D group showed a favorable trend in terms of mean operative time (170.7 ± 32.9 min vs 183.8 ± 35.4 min; P = 0.053) and a significant lower anastomotic time (16.9 ± 2.3 min vs 19.6 ± 2.9 min, P < 0.001). The complete mesocolic excision (CME) subgroups analysis showed a shorter anastomotic time (16.5 ± 1.8 min vs 19.9 ± 3.0 min; P < 0.001) and operative time (175.0 ± 38.5 min vs 193.7 ± 37.1 min; P = 0.063) in the 3D group. Six studies and our series were included in the meta-analysis with 551 patients (2D group: 291; 3D group: 260).The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the 3D group regarding the operative time (P < 0.001) and the anastomotic time (P < 0.001) while no differences were identified between groups in terms of blood loss (P = 0.827), LNH yield (P = 0.243), time to first flatus (P = 0.333), postoperative complications (P = 0.718) and length of stay (P = 0.835). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis results showed that 3D laparoscopic right colectomy shortens operative and anastomotic time without affecting the standard lymphadenectomy. In our series, the advantage of the 3D system becomes evident when CME and/or more complex associated procedure are requested significantly reducing both the total operative and the anastomotic time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8223707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82237072021-06-29 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis Costa, Gianluca Fransvea, Pietro Lepre, Luca Rondelli, Fabio Costa, Alessandro Campanelli, Michela Lisi, Giorgio Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo Garbarino, Giovanni Maria Ceccarelli, Graziano World J Gastrointest Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic approach for right colectomy have been well established. However, the technical difficulty to construct the intra-corporeal anastomosis is still cumbersome. AIM: To analyze the results of 3D and 2D laparoscopic right colectomy and to compare it to the published series through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomy at Umbria2 Hospitals from January 2014 to March 2020 was performed. A systematic review was accomplished comparing 2D and 3D right colectomy. RESULTS: In the personal series 47 patients of the 2D group were matched to 47 patients of the 3D group. The 3D group showed a favorable trend in terms of mean operative time (170.7 ± 32.9 min vs 183.8 ± 35.4 min; P = 0.053) and a significant lower anastomotic time (16.9 ± 2.3 min vs 19.6 ± 2.9 min, P < 0.001). The complete mesocolic excision (CME) subgroups analysis showed a shorter anastomotic time (16.5 ± 1.8 min vs 19.9 ± 3.0 min; P < 0.001) and operative time (175.0 ± 38.5 min vs 193.7 ± 37.1 min; P = 0.063) in the 3D group. Six studies and our series were included in the meta-analysis with 551 patients (2D group: 291; 3D group: 260).The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the 3D group regarding the operative time (P < 0.001) and the anastomotic time (P < 0.001) while no differences were identified between groups in terms of blood loss (P = 0.827), LNH yield (P = 0.243), time to first flatus (P = 0.333), postoperative complications (P = 0.718) and length of stay (P = 0.835). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis results showed that 3D laparoscopic right colectomy shortens operative and anastomotic time without affecting the standard lymphadenectomy. In our series, the advantage of the 3D system becomes evident when CME and/or more complex associated procedure are requested significantly reducing both the total operative and the anastomotic time. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-06-27 2021-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8223707/ /pubmed/34194617 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.597 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Costa, Gianluca
Fransvea, Pietro
Lepre, Luca
Rondelli, Fabio
Costa, Alessandro
Campanelli, Michela
Lisi, Giorgio
Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo
Garbarino, Giovanni Maria
Ceccarelli, Graziano
2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
title 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort 2d vs 3d laparoscopic right colectomy: a propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194617
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.597
work_keys_str_mv AT costagianluca 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fransveapietro 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lepreluca 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rondellifabio 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT costaalessandro 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT campanellimichela 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lisigiorgio 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mastrangelimariarosaria 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laraccagiovanniguglielmo 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT garbarinogiovannimaria 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ceccarelligraziano 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis