Cargando…
2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic approach for right colectomy have been well established. However, the technical difficulty to construct the intra-corporeal anastomosis is still cumbersome. AIM: To analyze the results of 3D and 2D laparoscopic right colectomy and to compare it to the publish...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194617 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.597 |
_version_ | 1783711748222615552 |
---|---|
author | Costa, Gianluca Fransvea, Pietro Lepre, Luca Rondelli, Fabio Costa, Alessandro Campanelli, Michela Lisi, Giorgio Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo Garbarino, Giovanni Maria Ceccarelli, Graziano |
author_facet | Costa, Gianluca Fransvea, Pietro Lepre, Luca Rondelli, Fabio Costa, Alessandro Campanelli, Michela Lisi, Giorgio Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo Garbarino, Giovanni Maria Ceccarelli, Graziano |
author_sort | Costa, Gianluca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic approach for right colectomy have been well established. However, the technical difficulty to construct the intra-corporeal anastomosis is still cumbersome. AIM: To analyze the results of 3D and 2D laparoscopic right colectomy and to compare it to the published series through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomy at Umbria2 Hospitals from January 2014 to March 2020 was performed. A systematic review was accomplished comparing 2D and 3D right colectomy. RESULTS: In the personal series 47 patients of the 2D group were matched to 47 patients of the 3D group. The 3D group showed a favorable trend in terms of mean operative time (170.7 ± 32.9 min vs 183.8 ± 35.4 min; P = 0.053) and a significant lower anastomotic time (16.9 ± 2.3 min vs 19.6 ± 2.9 min, P < 0.001). The complete mesocolic excision (CME) subgroups analysis showed a shorter anastomotic time (16.5 ± 1.8 min vs 19.9 ± 3.0 min; P < 0.001) and operative time (175.0 ± 38.5 min vs 193.7 ± 37.1 min; P = 0.063) in the 3D group. Six studies and our series were included in the meta-analysis with 551 patients (2D group: 291; 3D group: 260).The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the 3D group regarding the operative time (P < 0.001) and the anastomotic time (P < 0.001) while no differences were identified between groups in terms of blood loss (P = 0.827), LNH yield (P = 0.243), time to first flatus (P = 0.333), postoperative complications (P = 0.718) and length of stay (P = 0.835). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis results showed that 3D laparoscopic right colectomy shortens operative and anastomotic time without affecting the standard lymphadenectomy. In our series, the advantage of the 3D system becomes evident when CME and/or more complex associated procedure are requested significantly reducing both the total operative and the anastomotic time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8223707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82237072021-06-29 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis Costa, Gianluca Fransvea, Pietro Lepre, Luca Rondelli, Fabio Costa, Alessandro Campanelli, Michela Lisi, Giorgio Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo Garbarino, Giovanni Maria Ceccarelli, Graziano World J Gastrointest Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: The benefits of laparoscopic approach for right colectomy have been well established. However, the technical difficulty to construct the intra-corporeal anastomosis is still cumbersome. AIM: To analyze the results of 3D and 2D laparoscopic right colectomy and to compare it to the published series through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomy at Umbria2 Hospitals from January 2014 to March 2020 was performed. A systematic review was accomplished comparing 2D and 3D right colectomy. RESULTS: In the personal series 47 patients of the 2D group were matched to 47 patients of the 3D group. The 3D group showed a favorable trend in terms of mean operative time (170.7 ± 32.9 min vs 183.8 ± 35.4 min; P = 0.053) and a significant lower anastomotic time (16.9 ± 2.3 min vs 19.6 ± 2.9 min, P < 0.001). The complete mesocolic excision (CME) subgroups analysis showed a shorter anastomotic time (16.5 ± 1.8 min vs 19.9 ± 3.0 min; P < 0.001) and operative time (175.0 ± 38.5 min vs 193.7 ± 37.1 min; P = 0.063) in the 3D group. Six studies and our series were included in the meta-analysis with 551 patients (2D group: 291; 3D group: 260).The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the 3D group regarding the operative time (P < 0.001) and the anastomotic time (P < 0.001) while no differences were identified between groups in terms of blood loss (P = 0.827), LNH yield (P = 0.243), time to first flatus (P = 0.333), postoperative complications (P = 0.718) and length of stay (P = 0.835). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis results showed that 3D laparoscopic right colectomy shortens operative and anastomotic time without affecting the standard lymphadenectomy. In our series, the advantage of the 3D system becomes evident when CME and/or more complex associated procedure are requested significantly reducing both the total operative and the anastomotic time. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-06-27 2021-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8223707/ /pubmed/34194617 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.597 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Costa, Gianluca Fransvea, Pietro Lepre, Luca Rondelli, Fabio Costa, Alessandro Campanelli, Michela Lisi, Giorgio Mastrangeli, Maria Rosaria Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo Garbarino, Giovanni Maria Ceccarelli, Graziano 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | 2d vs 3d laparoscopic right colectomy: a propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194617 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costagianluca 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fransveapietro 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lepreluca 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rondellifabio 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT costaalessandro 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT campanellimichela 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lisigiorgio 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mastrangelimariarosaria 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT laraccagiovanniguglielmo 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT garbarinogiovannimaria 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ceccarelligraziano 2dvs3dlaparoscopicrightcolectomyapropensityscorematchingcomparisonofpersonalexperiencewithsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |