Cargando…

Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review

The advancement in the material of spinal implant and technique of spinal instrumentation has led to an increase in spine surgeries. The final desired outcome of spine surgery involving instrumentation is fusion. There is a race among implants to fail and bone to fuse. If there is a formation of pse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Anuj, Das, Kalidutta, Bansal, Kuldeep, Singh Chhabra, Harvinder, Arora, Mohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178543
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15233
_version_ 1783711756691963904
author Gupta, Anuj
Das, Kalidutta
Bansal, Kuldeep
Singh Chhabra, Harvinder
Arora, Mohit
author_facet Gupta, Anuj
Das, Kalidutta
Bansal, Kuldeep
Singh Chhabra, Harvinder
Arora, Mohit
author_sort Gupta, Anuj
collection PubMed
description The advancement in the material of spinal implant and technique of spinal instrumentation has led to an increase in spine surgeries. The final desired outcome of spine surgery involving instrumentation is fusion. There is a race among implants to fail and bone to fuse. If there is a formation of pseudoarthrosis or failure to fuse then implants are bound to fail. The most common presentation of pseudoarthrosis is implant breakage. Hence, should we label every implant that has presented with breakage as a “failure”? In this article, we have discussed our experience of two cases presented to us with implant breakage but which were managed successfully with conservative methods. Both of our cases did well without any surgical intervention. We have follow-ups of seven years in one case and five years in the other. Every patient with pseudoarthrosis does not require surgical management and hence, every implant breakage should not be labeled as implant “failure”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8223761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82237612021-06-26 Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review Gupta, Anuj Das, Kalidutta Bansal, Kuldeep Singh Chhabra, Harvinder Arora, Mohit Cureus Medical Education The advancement in the material of spinal implant and technique of spinal instrumentation has led to an increase in spine surgeries. The final desired outcome of spine surgery involving instrumentation is fusion. There is a race among implants to fail and bone to fuse. If there is a formation of pseudoarthrosis or failure to fuse then implants are bound to fail. The most common presentation of pseudoarthrosis is implant breakage. Hence, should we label every implant that has presented with breakage as a “failure”? In this article, we have discussed our experience of two cases presented to us with implant breakage but which were managed successfully with conservative methods. Both of our cases did well without any surgical intervention. We have follow-ups of seven years in one case and five years in the other. Every patient with pseudoarthrosis does not require surgical management and hence, every implant breakage should not be labeled as implant “failure”. Cureus 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8223761/ /pubmed/34178543 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15233 Text en Copyright © 2021, Gupta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Gupta, Anuj
Das, Kalidutta
Bansal, Kuldeep
Singh Chhabra, Harvinder
Arora, Mohit
Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review
title Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review
title_full Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review
title_fullStr Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review
title_short Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review
title_sort should implant breakage be always considered as implant “failure” in spine surgery: analysis of two cases and literature review
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178543
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15233
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaanuj shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT daskalidutta shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT bansalkuldeep shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT singhchhabraharvinder shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT aroramohit shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview