Cargando…
Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review
The advancement in the material of spinal implant and technique of spinal instrumentation has led to an increase in spine surgeries. The final desired outcome of spine surgery involving instrumentation is fusion. There is a race among implants to fail and bone to fuse. If there is a formation of pse...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178543 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15233 |
_version_ | 1783711756691963904 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Anuj Das, Kalidutta Bansal, Kuldeep Singh Chhabra, Harvinder Arora, Mohit |
author_facet | Gupta, Anuj Das, Kalidutta Bansal, Kuldeep Singh Chhabra, Harvinder Arora, Mohit |
author_sort | Gupta, Anuj |
collection | PubMed |
description | The advancement in the material of spinal implant and technique of spinal instrumentation has led to an increase in spine surgeries. The final desired outcome of spine surgery involving instrumentation is fusion. There is a race among implants to fail and bone to fuse. If there is a formation of pseudoarthrosis or failure to fuse then implants are bound to fail. The most common presentation of pseudoarthrosis is implant breakage. Hence, should we label every implant that has presented with breakage as a “failure”? In this article, we have discussed our experience of two cases presented to us with implant breakage but which were managed successfully with conservative methods. Both of our cases did well without any surgical intervention. We have follow-ups of seven years in one case and five years in the other. Every patient with pseudoarthrosis does not require surgical management and hence, every implant breakage should not be labeled as implant “failure”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8223761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82237612021-06-26 Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review Gupta, Anuj Das, Kalidutta Bansal, Kuldeep Singh Chhabra, Harvinder Arora, Mohit Cureus Medical Education The advancement in the material of spinal implant and technique of spinal instrumentation has led to an increase in spine surgeries. The final desired outcome of spine surgery involving instrumentation is fusion. There is a race among implants to fail and bone to fuse. If there is a formation of pseudoarthrosis or failure to fuse then implants are bound to fail. The most common presentation of pseudoarthrosis is implant breakage. Hence, should we label every implant that has presented with breakage as a “failure”? In this article, we have discussed our experience of two cases presented to us with implant breakage but which were managed successfully with conservative methods. Both of our cases did well without any surgical intervention. We have follow-ups of seven years in one case and five years in the other. Every patient with pseudoarthrosis does not require surgical management and hence, every implant breakage should not be labeled as implant “failure”. Cureus 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8223761/ /pubmed/34178543 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15233 Text en Copyright © 2021, Gupta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education Gupta, Anuj Das, Kalidutta Bansal, Kuldeep Singh Chhabra, Harvinder Arora, Mohit Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review |
title | Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review |
title_full | Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review |
title_short | Should Implant Breakage Be Always Considered as Implant “Failure” in Spine Surgery: Analysis of Two Cases and Literature Review |
title_sort | should implant breakage be always considered as implant “failure” in spine surgery: analysis of two cases and literature review |
topic | Medical Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178543 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptaanuj shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview AT daskalidutta shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview AT bansalkuldeep shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview AT singhchhabraharvinder shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview AT aroramohit shouldimplantbreakagebealwaysconsideredasimplantfailureinspinesurgeryanalysisoftwocasesandliteraturereview |