Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures

Ultrasound-based assessment of the fetal nervous system is routinely recommended at the time of the mid-trimester anatomy scan or at different gestations based on clinical indications. This review evaluates the methodological quality of studies aimed at creating charts for fetal brain structures obt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donadono, Vera, Cavallaro, Angelo, Roberts, Nia W., Ioannou, Christos, Papageorghiou, Aris T., Napolitano, Raffaele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063793
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060916
_version_ 1783711759670968320
author Donadono, Vera
Cavallaro, Angelo
Roberts, Nia W.
Ioannou, Christos
Papageorghiou, Aris T.
Napolitano, Raffaele
author_facet Donadono, Vera
Cavallaro, Angelo
Roberts, Nia W.
Ioannou, Christos
Papageorghiou, Aris T.
Napolitano, Raffaele
author_sort Donadono, Vera
collection PubMed
description Ultrasound-based assessment of the fetal nervous system is routinely recommended at the time of the mid-trimester anatomy scan or at different gestations based on clinical indications. This review evaluates the methodological quality of studies aimed at creating charts for fetal brain structures obtained by ultrasound, as poor methodology could explain substantial variability in percentiles reported. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched from January 1970 to January 2021 to select studies on singleton fetuses, where the main aim was to construct charts on one or more clinically relevant structures obtained in the axial plane: parieto-occipital fissure, Sylvian fissure, anterior ventricle, posterior ventricle, transcerebellar diameter, and cisterna magna. Studies were scored against 29 predefined methodological quality criteria to identify the risk of bias. In total, 42 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing data for 45,626 fetuses. Substantial heterogeneity was identified in the methodological quality of included studies, and this may explain the high variability in centiles reported. In 80% of the studies, a high risk of bias was found in more than 50% of the domains scored. In conclusion, charts to be used in clinical practice and research should have an optimal study design in order to minimise the risk of bias and to allow comparison between different studies. We propose to use charts from studies with the highest methodological quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8223776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82237762021-06-25 A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures Donadono, Vera Cavallaro, Angelo Roberts, Nia W. Ioannou, Christos Papageorghiou, Aris T. Napolitano, Raffaele Diagnostics (Basel) Review Ultrasound-based assessment of the fetal nervous system is routinely recommended at the time of the mid-trimester anatomy scan or at different gestations based on clinical indications. This review evaluates the methodological quality of studies aimed at creating charts for fetal brain structures obtained by ultrasound, as poor methodology could explain substantial variability in percentiles reported. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched from January 1970 to January 2021 to select studies on singleton fetuses, where the main aim was to construct charts on one or more clinically relevant structures obtained in the axial plane: parieto-occipital fissure, Sylvian fissure, anterior ventricle, posterior ventricle, transcerebellar diameter, and cisterna magna. Studies were scored against 29 predefined methodological quality criteria to identify the risk of bias. In total, 42 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing data for 45,626 fetuses. Substantial heterogeneity was identified in the methodological quality of included studies, and this may explain the high variability in centiles reported. In 80% of the studies, a high risk of bias was found in more than 50% of the domains scored. In conclusion, charts to be used in clinical practice and research should have an optimal study design in order to minimise the risk of bias and to allow comparison between different studies. We propose to use charts from studies with the highest methodological quality. MDPI 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8223776/ /pubmed/34063793 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060916 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Donadono, Vera
Cavallaro, Angelo
Roberts, Nia W.
Ioannou, Christos
Papageorghiou, Aris T.
Napolitano, Raffaele
A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures
title A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures
title_full A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures
title_short A Systematic Review of Methodology Used in Studies Aimed at Creating Charts of Fetal Brain Structures
title_sort systematic review of methodology used in studies aimed at creating charts of fetal brain structures
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063793
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060916
work_keys_str_mv AT donadonovera asystematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT cavallaroangelo asystematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT robertsniaw asystematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT ioannouchristos asystematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT papageorghiouarist asystematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT napolitanoraffaele asystematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT donadonovera systematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT cavallaroangelo systematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT robertsniaw systematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT ioannouchristos systematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT papageorghiouarist systematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures
AT napolitanoraffaele systematicreviewofmethodologyusedinstudiesaimedatcreatingchartsoffetalbrainstructures