Cargando…
SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
During the last month of 2019, a new Coronavirus from China started to spread all around the world causing a pandemic emergency still ongoing. The outbreak made imperative the need for diagnostic and screening tests that could identify the current and past infection state of an individual. Occupatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885 srl
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142672 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i3.11472 |
_version_ | 1783711790721400832 |
---|---|
author | Ferrari, Luca Nigro, Simona Bordini, Lorenzo Carugno, Michele Bollati, Valentina |
author_facet | Ferrari, Luca Nigro, Simona Bordini, Lorenzo Carugno, Michele Bollati, Valentina |
author_sort | Ferrari, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the last month of 2019, a new Coronavirus from China started to spread all around the world causing a pandemic emergency still ongoing. The outbreak made imperative the need for diagnostic and screening tests that could identify the current and past infection state of an individual. Occupational medicine is facing a very demanding challenge, as the pandemic set off the need to re-evaluate many aspects of workplace safety. A fundamental role has been played by tests used to diagnose COVID-19 and to isolate infected asymptomatic subjects, with a view to the viral evolution and the emerging variants. However, the need for the urgent set-up of new methods for assessing both new and past infections has resulted in a large number of methods, not always comparable with each other, in terms of laboratory techniques, viral antigens used for detection, and class of antibodies detected. These factors make it difficult to understand the serological test results and their possible application. In this paper, we reviewed the types of assays currently available, to address some key aspects that characterize each technique, and might have an impact on results interpretation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8223938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82239382021-07-01 SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get Ferrari, Luca Nigro, Simona Bordini, Lorenzo Carugno, Michele Bollati, Valentina Med Lav Commentaries, Perspectives, Insights During the last month of 2019, a new Coronavirus from China started to spread all around the world causing a pandemic emergency still ongoing. The outbreak made imperative the need for diagnostic and screening tests that could identify the current and past infection state of an individual. Occupational medicine is facing a very demanding challenge, as the pandemic set off the need to re-evaluate many aspects of workplace safety. A fundamental role has been played by tests used to diagnose COVID-19 and to isolate infected asymptomatic subjects, with a view to the viral evolution and the emerging variants. However, the need for the urgent set-up of new methods for assessing both new and past infections has resulted in a large number of methods, not always comparable with each other, in terms of laboratory techniques, viral antigens used for detection, and class of antibodies detected. These factors make it difficult to understand the serological test results and their possible application. In this paper, we reviewed the types of assays currently available, to address some key aspects that characterize each technique, and might have an impact on results interpretation. Mattioli 1885 srl 2021 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8223938/ /pubmed/34142672 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i3.11472 Text en Copyright: © 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Commentaries, Perspectives, Insights Ferrari, Luca Nigro, Simona Bordini, Lorenzo Carugno, Michele Bollati, Valentina SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get |
title | SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get |
title_full | SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get |
title_fullStr | SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get |
title_full_unstemmed | SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get |
title_short | SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get |
title_sort | sars-cov-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get |
topic | Commentaries, Perspectives, Insights |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142672 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i3.11472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrariluca sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget AT nigrosimona sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget AT bordinilorenzo sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget AT carugnomichele sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget AT bollativalentina sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget |