Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get

During the last month of 2019, a new Coronavirus from China started to spread all around the world causing a pandemic emergency still ongoing. The outbreak made imperative the need for diagnostic and screening tests that could identify the current and past infection state of an individual. Occupatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrari, Luca, Nigro, Simona, Bordini, Lorenzo, Carugno, Michele, Bollati, Valentina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 srl 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142672
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i3.11472
_version_ 1783711790721400832
author Ferrari, Luca
Nigro, Simona
Bordini, Lorenzo
Carugno, Michele
Bollati, Valentina
author_facet Ferrari, Luca
Nigro, Simona
Bordini, Lorenzo
Carugno, Michele
Bollati, Valentina
author_sort Ferrari, Luca
collection PubMed
description During the last month of 2019, a new Coronavirus from China started to spread all around the world causing a pandemic emergency still ongoing. The outbreak made imperative the need for diagnostic and screening tests that could identify the current and past infection state of an individual. Occupational medicine is facing a very demanding challenge, as the pandemic set off the need to re-evaluate many aspects of workplace safety. A fundamental role has been played by tests used to diagnose COVID-19 and to isolate infected asymptomatic subjects, with a view to the viral evolution and the emerging variants. However, the need for the urgent set-up of new methods for assessing both new and past infections has resulted in a large number of methods, not always comparable with each other, in terms of laboratory techniques, viral antigens used for detection, and class of antibodies detected. These factors make it difficult to understand the serological test results and their possible application. In this paper, we reviewed the types of assays currently available, to address some key aspects that characterize each technique, and might have an impact on results interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8223938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mattioli 1885 srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82239382021-07-01 SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get Ferrari, Luca Nigro, Simona Bordini, Lorenzo Carugno, Michele Bollati, Valentina Med Lav Commentaries, Perspectives, Insights During the last month of 2019, a new Coronavirus from China started to spread all around the world causing a pandemic emergency still ongoing. The outbreak made imperative the need for diagnostic and screening tests that could identify the current and past infection state of an individual. Occupational medicine is facing a very demanding challenge, as the pandemic set off the need to re-evaluate many aspects of workplace safety. A fundamental role has been played by tests used to diagnose COVID-19 and to isolate infected asymptomatic subjects, with a view to the viral evolution and the emerging variants. However, the need for the urgent set-up of new methods for assessing both new and past infections has resulted in a large number of methods, not always comparable with each other, in terms of laboratory techniques, viral antigens used for detection, and class of antibodies detected. These factors make it difficult to understand the serological test results and their possible application. In this paper, we reviewed the types of assays currently available, to address some key aspects that characterize each technique, and might have an impact on results interpretation. Mattioli 1885 srl 2021 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8223938/ /pubmed/34142672 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i3.11472 Text en Copyright: © 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Commentaries, Perspectives, Insights
Ferrari, Luca
Nigro, Simona
Bordini, Lorenzo
Carugno, Michele
Bollati, Valentina
SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
title SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
title_full SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
title_short SARS-CoV-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
title_sort sars-cov-2 tests in occupational settings: what you look for is what you get
topic Commentaries, Perspectives, Insights
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8223938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142672
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i3.11472
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrariluca sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget
AT nigrosimona sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget
AT bordinilorenzo sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget
AT carugnomichele sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget
AT bollativalentina sarscov2testsinoccupationalsettingswhatyoulookforiswhatyouget