Cargando…
General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study
BACKGROUND: Emergency Care and Treatment Plans are recommended for all primary care patients in the United Kingdom who are expected to experience deterioration of their health. The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) was developed to integrate resuscitation decisions...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34167478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01486-w |
_version_ | 1783711849000206336 |
---|---|
author | Huxley, Caroline J. Eli, Karin Hawkes, Claire A. Perkins, Gavin D. George, Rob Griffiths, Frances Slowther, Anne-Marie |
author_facet | Huxley, Caroline J. Eli, Karin Hawkes, Claire A. Perkins, Gavin D. George, Rob Griffiths, Frances Slowther, Anne-Marie |
author_sort | Huxley, Caroline J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emergency Care and Treatment Plans are recommended for all primary care patients in the United Kingdom who are expected to experience deterioration of their health. The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) was developed to integrate resuscitation decisions with discussions about wider goals of care. It summarises treatment recommendations discussed and agreed between patients and their clinicians for a future emergency situation and was designed to meet the needs of different care settings. Our aim is to explore GPs’ experiences of using ReSPECT and how it transfers across the primary care and secondary care interface. METHODS: We conducted five focus groups with GPs in areas being served by hospitals in England that have implemented ReSPECT. Participants were asked about their experience of ReSPECT, how they initiate ReSPECT-type conversations, and their experiences of ReSPECT-type recommendations being communicated across primary and secondary care. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: GPs conceptualise ReSPECT as an end of life planning document, which is best completed in primary care. As an end of life care document, completing ReSPECT is an emotional process and conversations are shaped by what a ‘good death’ is thought to be. ReSPECT recommendations are not always communicated or transferable across care settings. A focus on the patient’s preferences around death, and GPs’ lack of specialist knowledge, could be a barrier to completion of ReSPECT that is transferable to acute settings. CONCLUSION: Conceptualising ReSPECT as an end of life care document suggests a difference in how general practitioners understand ReSPECT from its designers. This impacts on the transferability of ReSPECT recommendations to the hospital setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01486-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8224258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82242582021-06-25 General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study Huxley, Caroline J. Eli, Karin Hawkes, Claire A. Perkins, Gavin D. George, Rob Griffiths, Frances Slowther, Anne-Marie BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Emergency Care and Treatment Plans are recommended for all primary care patients in the United Kingdom who are expected to experience deterioration of their health. The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) was developed to integrate resuscitation decisions with discussions about wider goals of care. It summarises treatment recommendations discussed and agreed between patients and their clinicians for a future emergency situation and was designed to meet the needs of different care settings. Our aim is to explore GPs’ experiences of using ReSPECT and how it transfers across the primary care and secondary care interface. METHODS: We conducted five focus groups with GPs in areas being served by hospitals in England that have implemented ReSPECT. Participants were asked about their experience of ReSPECT, how they initiate ReSPECT-type conversations, and their experiences of ReSPECT-type recommendations being communicated across primary and secondary care. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: GPs conceptualise ReSPECT as an end of life planning document, which is best completed in primary care. As an end of life care document, completing ReSPECT is an emotional process and conversations are shaped by what a ‘good death’ is thought to be. ReSPECT recommendations are not always communicated or transferable across care settings. A focus on the patient’s preferences around death, and GPs’ lack of specialist knowledge, could be a barrier to completion of ReSPECT that is transferable to acute settings. CONCLUSION: Conceptualising ReSPECT as an end of life care document suggests a difference in how general practitioners understand ReSPECT from its designers. This impacts on the transferability of ReSPECT recommendations to the hospital setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01486-w. BioMed Central 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8224258/ /pubmed/34167478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01486-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huxley, Caroline J. Eli, Karin Hawkes, Claire A. Perkins, Gavin D. George, Rob Griffiths, Frances Slowther, Anne-Marie General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study |
title | General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study |
title_full | General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study |
title_fullStr | General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study |
title_full_unstemmed | General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study |
title_short | General practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study |
title_sort | general practitioners’ experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in england: a focus group study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34167478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01486-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huxleycarolinej generalpractitionersexperiencesofemergencycareandtreatmentplanninginenglandafocusgroupstudy AT elikarin generalpractitionersexperiencesofemergencycareandtreatmentplanninginenglandafocusgroupstudy AT hawkesclairea generalpractitionersexperiencesofemergencycareandtreatmentplanninginenglandafocusgroupstudy AT perkinsgavind generalpractitionersexperiencesofemergencycareandtreatmentplanninginenglandafocusgroupstudy AT georgerob generalpractitionersexperiencesofemergencycareandtreatmentplanninginenglandafocusgroupstudy AT griffithsfrances generalpractitionersexperiencesofemergencycareandtreatmentplanninginenglandafocusgroupstudy AT slowtherannemarie generalpractitionersexperiencesofemergencycareandtreatmentplanninginenglandafocusgroupstudy |