Cargando…
Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy
Leaf counting in potted plants is an important building block for estimating their health status and growth rate and has obtained increasing attention from the visual phenotyping community in recent years. Two novel deep learning approaches for visual leaf counting tasks are proposed, evaluated, and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.575751 |
_version_ | 1783711882068099072 |
---|---|
author | Farjon, Guy Itzhaky, Yotam Khoroshevsky, Faina Bar-Hillel, Aharon |
author_facet | Farjon, Guy Itzhaky, Yotam Khoroshevsky, Faina Bar-Hillel, Aharon |
author_sort | Farjon, Guy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Leaf counting in potted plants is an important building block for estimating their health status and growth rate and has obtained increasing attention from the visual phenotyping community in recent years. Two novel deep learning approaches for visual leaf counting tasks are proposed, evaluated, and compared in this study. The first method performs counting via direct regression but using multiple image representation resolutions to attend leaves of multiple scales. The leaf count from multiple resolutions is fused using a novel technique to get the final count. The second method is detection with a regression model that counts the leaves after locating leaf center points and aggregating them. The algorithms are evaluated on the Leaf Counting Challenge (LCC) dataset of the Computer Vision Problems in Plant Phenotyping (CVPPP) conference 2017, and a new larger dataset of banana leaves. Experimental results show that both methods outperform previous CVPPP LCC challenge winners, based on the challenge evaluation metrics, and place this study as the state of the art in leaf counting. The detection with regression method is found to be preferable for larger datasets when the center-dot annotation is available, and it also enables leaf center localization with a 0.94 average precision. When such annotations are not available, the multiple scale regression model is a good option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8224400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82244002021-06-25 Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy Farjon, Guy Itzhaky, Yotam Khoroshevsky, Faina Bar-Hillel, Aharon Front Plant Sci Plant Science Leaf counting in potted plants is an important building block for estimating their health status and growth rate and has obtained increasing attention from the visual phenotyping community in recent years. Two novel deep learning approaches for visual leaf counting tasks are proposed, evaluated, and compared in this study. The first method performs counting via direct regression but using multiple image representation resolutions to attend leaves of multiple scales. The leaf count from multiple resolutions is fused using a novel technique to get the final count. The second method is detection with a regression model that counts the leaves after locating leaf center points and aggregating them. The algorithms are evaluated on the Leaf Counting Challenge (LCC) dataset of the Computer Vision Problems in Plant Phenotyping (CVPPP) conference 2017, and a new larger dataset of banana leaves. Experimental results show that both methods outperform previous CVPPP LCC challenge winners, based on the challenge evaluation metrics, and place this study as the state of the art in leaf counting. The detection with regression method is found to be preferable for larger datasets when the center-dot annotation is available, and it also enables leaf center localization with a 0.94 average precision. When such annotations are not available, the multiple scale regression model is a good option. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8224400/ /pubmed/34177972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.575751 Text en Copyright © 2021 Farjon, Itzhaky, Khoroshevsky and Bar-Hillel. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Farjon, Guy Itzhaky, Yotam Khoroshevsky, Faina Bar-Hillel, Aharon Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy |
title | Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy |
title_full | Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy |
title_fullStr | Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy |
title_full_unstemmed | Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy |
title_short | Leaf Counting: Fusing Network Components for Improved Accuracy |
title_sort | leaf counting: fusing network components for improved accuracy |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.575751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farjonguy leafcountingfusingnetworkcomponentsforimprovedaccuracy AT itzhakyyotam leafcountingfusingnetworkcomponentsforimprovedaccuracy AT khoroshevskyfaina leafcountingfusingnetworkcomponentsforimprovedaccuracy AT barhillelaharon leafcountingfusingnetworkcomponentsforimprovedaccuracy |