Cargando…

BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?

Nearly four decades after their conceptualization, antibody-based therapies are slowly being added to the treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While the antibody–drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin is the only antibody-based therapy that has been approved for AML treatment thus far,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Cecily, Zeidan, Amer M., Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071099
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060465
_version_ 1783711962943717376
author Allen, Cecily
Zeidan, Amer M.
Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
author_facet Allen, Cecily
Zeidan, Amer M.
Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
author_sort Allen, Cecily
collection PubMed
description Nearly four decades after their conceptualization, antibody-based therapies are slowly being added to the treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While the antibody–drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin is the only antibody-based therapy that has been approved for AML treatment thus far, several bispecific antibodies have been developed and shown early encouraging results. Bispecific antibodies comprise a wide variety of constructs that share the common concept of simultaneous binding of a surface target on malignant cells and most commonly CD3 on T cells leading to an endogenous, HLA-independent, immune response against malignant cells. However, the use of bispecific antibodies in AML has been limited by the absence of highly specific leukemia-associated antigens leading to on-target, off-leukemia side effects as well as reduced efficacy due to antigen escape. Herein, we discuss the history and evolution of bispecific T cell engagers as well as various adaptations such as dual affinity retargeting antibodies, bi- and tri-specific killer engager antibodies. Common side effects including cytokine release syndrome and management thereof are highlighted. Lastly, we expound on the future direction and integration of such antibody-based therapies with other immunotherapies (programmed cell death-1 inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8224808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82248082021-06-25 BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML? Allen, Cecily Zeidan, Amer M. Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp Life (Basel) Review Nearly four decades after their conceptualization, antibody-based therapies are slowly being added to the treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While the antibody–drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin is the only antibody-based therapy that has been approved for AML treatment thus far, several bispecific antibodies have been developed and shown early encouraging results. Bispecific antibodies comprise a wide variety of constructs that share the common concept of simultaneous binding of a surface target on malignant cells and most commonly CD3 on T cells leading to an endogenous, HLA-independent, immune response against malignant cells. However, the use of bispecific antibodies in AML has been limited by the absence of highly specific leukemia-associated antigens leading to on-target, off-leukemia side effects as well as reduced efficacy due to antigen escape. Herein, we discuss the history and evolution of bispecific T cell engagers as well as various adaptations such as dual affinity retargeting antibodies, bi- and tri-specific killer engager antibodies. Common side effects including cytokine release syndrome and management thereof are highlighted. Lastly, we expound on the future direction and integration of such antibody-based therapies with other immunotherapies (programmed cell death-1 inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells). MDPI 2021-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8224808/ /pubmed/34071099 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060465 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Allen, Cecily
Zeidan, Amer M.
Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?
title BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?
title_full BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?
title_fullStr BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?
title_full_unstemmed BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?
title_short BiTEs, DARTS, BiKEs and TriKEs—Are Antibody Based Therapies Changing the Future Treatment of AML?
title_sort bites, darts, bikes and trikes—are antibody based therapies changing the future treatment of aml?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071099
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11060465
work_keys_str_mv AT allencecily bitesdartsbikesandtrikesareantibodybasedtherapieschangingthefuturetreatmentofaml
AT zeidanamerm bitesdartsbikesandtrikesareantibodybasedtherapieschangingthefuturetreatmentofaml
AT bewersdorfjanphilipp bitesdartsbikesandtrikesareantibodybasedtherapieschangingthefuturetreatmentofaml