Cargando…

Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review

Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy, Youssef, Haroun Ali, Saleh, Ahmed Sayed, Bollen, Peter, Zvara, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253192
_version_ 1783711985081253888
author Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy
Youssef, Haroun Ali
Saleh, Ahmed Sayed
Bollen, Peter
Zvara, Peter
author_facet Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy
Youssef, Haroun Ali
Saleh, Ahmed Sayed
Bollen, Peter
Zvara, Peter
author_sort Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy
collection PubMed
description Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia and repeated measurements while preserving the function which is being studied. All studies published in English language, which compared the data obtained under various types of anesthesia and the urodynamics performed in awake animals were included. It appears that urethane, an anesthetic recommended extensively for the investigation of lower urinary tract function, is appropriate for acute urodynamic studies only. Major advantages of urethane are its stability and ability to preserve the micturition reflex. Due to its toxicity and carcinogenicity, urethane anesthesia should not be used for recovery procedures. This review evaluated available alternatives including propofol, isoflurane and combinations of urethane, ketamine/xylazine, ketamine/medetomidine, and/or fentanyl/fluanisone/midazolam. Different effects have been demonstrated among these drugs on the urinary bladder, the urethral sphincter, as well as on their neuroregulation. The lowest incidence of adverse effects was observed with the use of a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Although the variations in the reviewed study protocols represent a limitation, we believe that this summary will help in standardizing and optimizing future experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8224928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82249282021-07-19 Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy Youssef, Haroun Ali Saleh, Ahmed Sayed Bollen, Peter Zvara, Peter PLoS One Research Article Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia and repeated measurements while preserving the function which is being studied. All studies published in English language, which compared the data obtained under various types of anesthesia and the urodynamics performed in awake animals were included. It appears that urethane, an anesthetic recommended extensively for the investigation of lower urinary tract function, is appropriate for acute urodynamic studies only. Major advantages of urethane are its stability and ability to preserve the micturition reflex. Due to its toxicity and carcinogenicity, urethane anesthesia should not be used for recovery procedures. This review evaluated available alternatives including propofol, isoflurane and combinations of urethane, ketamine/xylazine, ketamine/medetomidine, and/or fentanyl/fluanisone/midazolam. Different effects have been demonstrated among these drugs on the urinary bladder, the urethral sphincter, as well as on their neuroregulation. The lowest incidence of adverse effects was observed with the use of a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Although the variations in the reviewed study protocols represent a limitation, we believe that this summary will help in standardizing and optimizing future experiments. Public Library of Science 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8224928/ /pubmed/34166394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253192 Text en © 2021 Abdelkhalek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy
Youssef, Haroun Ali
Saleh, Ahmed Sayed
Bollen, Peter
Zvara, Peter
Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review
title Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review
title_full Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review
title_fullStr Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review
title_short Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review
title_sort anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253192
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelkhalekabdelkhaleksamy anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview
AT youssefharounali anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview
AT salehahmedsayed anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview
AT bollenpeter anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview
AT zvarapeter anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview