Cargando…
Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review
Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253192 |
_version_ | 1783711985081253888 |
---|---|
author | Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy Youssef, Haroun Ali Saleh, Ahmed Sayed Bollen, Peter Zvara, Peter |
author_facet | Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy Youssef, Haroun Ali Saleh, Ahmed Sayed Bollen, Peter Zvara, Peter |
author_sort | Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia and repeated measurements while preserving the function which is being studied. All studies published in English language, which compared the data obtained under various types of anesthesia and the urodynamics performed in awake animals were included. It appears that urethane, an anesthetic recommended extensively for the investigation of lower urinary tract function, is appropriate for acute urodynamic studies only. Major advantages of urethane are its stability and ability to preserve the micturition reflex. Due to its toxicity and carcinogenicity, urethane anesthesia should not be used for recovery procedures. This review evaluated available alternatives including propofol, isoflurane and combinations of urethane, ketamine/xylazine, ketamine/medetomidine, and/or fentanyl/fluanisone/midazolam. Different effects have been demonstrated among these drugs on the urinary bladder, the urethral sphincter, as well as on their neuroregulation. The lowest incidence of adverse effects was observed with the use of a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Although the variations in the reviewed study protocols represent a limitation, we believe that this summary will help in standardizing and optimizing future experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8224928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82249282021-07-19 Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy Youssef, Haroun Ali Saleh, Ahmed Sayed Bollen, Peter Zvara, Peter PLoS One Research Article Urodynamic studies in rats and mice are broadly used to examine pathomechnisms of disease and identify and test therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the effects of the anesthetics on the lower urinary tract function and seeks to identify protocols that allow recovery from anesthesia and repeated measurements while preserving the function which is being studied. All studies published in English language, which compared the data obtained under various types of anesthesia and the urodynamics performed in awake animals were included. It appears that urethane, an anesthetic recommended extensively for the investigation of lower urinary tract function, is appropriate for acute urodynamic studies only. Major advantages of urethane are its stability and ability to preserve the micturition reflex. Due to its toxicity and carcinogenicity, urethane anesthesia should not be used for recovery procedures. This review evaluated available alternatives including propofol, isoflurane and combinations of urethane, ketamine/xylazine, ketamine/medetomidine, and/or fentanyl/fluanisone/midazolam. Different effects have been demonstrated among these drugs on the urinary bladder, the urethral sphincter, as well as on their neuroregulation. The lowest incidence of adverse effects was observed with the use of a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Although the variations in the reviewed study protocols represent a limitation, we believe that this summary will help in standardizing and optimizing future experiments. Public Library of Science 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8224928/ /pubmed/34166394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253192 Text en © 2021 Abdelkhalek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abdelkhalek, Abdelkhalek Samy Youssef, Haroun Ali Saleh, Ahmed Sayed Bollen, Peter Zvara, Peter Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review |
title | Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review |
title_full | Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review |
title_short | Anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—A systematic review |
title_sort | anesthetic protocols for urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in small rodents—a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelkhalekabdelkhaleksamy anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview AT youssefharounali anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview AT salehahmedsayed anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview AT bollenpeter anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview AT zvarapeter anestheticprotocolsforurodynamicstudiesofthelowerurinarytractinsmallrodentsasystematicreview |