Cargando…

Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli

Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunasekera, Samantha, Abraham, Sam, Stegger, Marc, Pang, Stanley, Wang, Penghao, Sahibzada, Shafi, O’Dea, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253440
_version_ 1783711985336057856
author Gunasekera, Samantha
Abraham, Sam
Stegger, Marc
Pang, Stanley
Wang, Penghao
Sahibzada, Shafi
O’Dea, Mark
author_facet Gunasekera, Samantha
Abraham, Sam
Stegger, Marc
Pang, Stanley
Wang, Penghao
Sahibzada, Shafi
O’Dea, Mark
author_sort Gunasekera, Samantha
collection PubMed
description Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed that the recently released DNA Prep library preparation kit, formerly known as Nextera Flex, overcomes some of these limitations. This study aimed to assess bias in coverage, tagmentation, GC content, average fragment size distribution, and de novo assembly quality using both the Nextera XT and DNA Prep kits from Illumina. When performing whole-genome sequencing on Escherichia coli and where coverage bias is the main concern, the DNA Prep kit may provide higher quality results; though de novo assembly quality, tagmentation bias and GC content related bias are unlikely to improve. Based on these results, laboratories with existing workflows based on Nextera XT would see minor benefits in transitioning to the DNA Prep kit if they were primarily studying organisms with neutral GC content.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8224930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82249302021-07-19 Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli Gunasekera, Samantha Abraham, Sam Stegger, Marc Pang, Stanley Wang, Penghao Sahibzada, Shafi O’Dea, Mark PLoS One Research Article Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed that the recently released DNA Prep library preparation kit, formerly known as Nextera Flex, overcomes some of these limitations. This study aimed to assess bias in coverage, tagmentation, GC content, average fragment size distribution, and de novo assembly quality using both the Nextera XT and DNA Prep kits from Illumina. When performing whole-genome sequencing on Escherichia coli and where coverage bias is the main concern, the DNA Prep kit may provide higher quality results; though de novo assembly quality, tagmentation bias and GC content related bias are unlikely to improve. Based on these results, laboratories with existing workflows based on Nextera XT would see minor benefits in transitioning to the DNA Prep kit if they were primarily studying organisms with neutral GC content. Public Library of Science 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8224930/ /pubmed/34166413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253440 Text en © 2021 Gunasekera et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gunasekera, Samantha
Abraham, Sam
Stegger, Marc
Pang, Stanley
Wang, Penghao
Sahibzada, Shafi
O’Dea, Mark
Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
title Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
title_full Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
title_fullStr Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
title_short Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
title_sort evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of escherichia coli
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253440
work_keys_str_mv AT gunasekerasamantha evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli
AT abrahamsam evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli
AT steggermarc evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli
AT pangstanley evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli
AT wangpenghao evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli
AT sahibzadashafi evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli
AT odeamark evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli