Cargando…
Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253440 |
_version_ | 1783711985336057856 |
---|---|
author | Gunasekera, Samantha Abraham, Sam Stegger, Marc Pang, Stanley Wang, Penghao Sahibzada, Shafi O’Dea, Mark |
author_facet | Gunasekera, Samantha Abraham, Sam Stegger, Marc Pang, Stanley Wang, Penghao Sahibzada, Shafi O’Dea, Mark |
author_sort | Gunasekera, Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed that the recently released DNA Prep library preparation kit, formerly known as Nextera Flex, overcomes some of these limitations. This study aimed to assess bias in coverage, tagmentation, GC content, average fragment size distribution, and de novo assembly quality using both the Nextera XT and DNA Prep kits from Illumina. When performing whole-genome sequencing on Escherichia coli and where coverage bias is the main concern, the DNA Prep kit may provide higher quality results; though de novo assembly quality, tagmentation bias and GC content related bias are unlikely to improve. Based on these results, laboratories with existing workflows based on Nextera XT would see minor benefits in transitioning to the DNA Prep kit if they were primarily studying organisms with neutral GC content. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8224930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82249302021-07-19 Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli Gunasekera, Samantha Abraham, Sam Stegger, Marc Pang, Stanley Wang, Penghao Sahibzada, Shafi O’Dea, Mark PLoS One Research Article Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed that the recently released DNA Prep library preparation kit, formerly known as Nextera Flex, overcomes some of these limitations. This study aimed to assess bias in coverage, tagmentation, GC content, average fragment size distribution, and de novo assembly quality using both the Nextera XT and DNA Prep kits from Illumina. When performing whole-genome sequencing on Escherichia coli and where coverage bias is the main concern, the DNA Prep kit may provide higher quality results; though de novo assembly quality, tagmentation bias and GC content related bias are unlikely to improve. Based on these results, laboratories with existing workflows based on Nextera XT would see minor benefits in transitioning to the DNA Prep kit if they were primarily studying organisms with neutral GC content. Public Library of Science 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8224930/ /pubmed/34166413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253440 Text en © 2021 Gunasekera et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gunasekera, Samantha Abraham, Sam Stegger, Marc Pang, Stanley Wang, Penghao Sahibzada, Shafi O’Dea, Mark Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli |
title | Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli |
title_full | Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli |
title_fullStr | Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli |
title_short | Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli |
title_sort | evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of escherichia coli |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34166413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunasekerasamantha evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli AT abrahamsam evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli AT steggermarc evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli AT pangstanley evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli AT wangpenghao evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli AT sahibzadashafi evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli AT odeamark evaluatingcoveragebiasinnextgenerationsequencingofescherichiacoli |