Cargando…

Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge

The Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) challenges focuses the computational modeling community on areas in need of improvement for rational drug design. The SAMPL7 physical property challenge dealt with prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients and pK(a) for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergazin, Teresa Danielle, Tielker, Nicolas, Zhang, Yingying, Mao, Junjun, Gunner, M. R., Francisco, Karol, Ballatore, Carlo, Kast, Stefan M., Mobley, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-021-00397-3
_version_ 1783711998958108672
author Bergazin, Teresa Danielle
Tielker, Nicolas
Zhang, Yingying
Mao, Junjun
Gunner, M. R.
Francisco, Karol
Ballatore, Carlo
Kast, Stefan M.
Mobley, David L.
author_facet Bergazin, Teresa Danielle
Tielker, Nicolas
Zhang, Yingying
Mao, Junjun
Gunner, M. R.
Francisco, Karol
Ballatore, Carlo
Kast, Stefan M.
Mobley, David L.
author_sort Bergazin, Teresa Danielle
collection PubMed
description The Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) challenges focuses the computational modeling community on areas in need of improvement for rational drug design. The SAMPL7 physical property challenge dealt with prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients and pK(a) for 22 compounds. The dataset was composed of a series of N-acylsulfonamides and related bioisosteres. 17 research groups participated in the log P challenge, submitting 33 blind submissions total. For the pK(a) challenge, 7 different groups participated, submitting 9 blind submissions in total. Overall, the accuracy of octanol-water log P predictions in the SAMPL7 challenge was lower than octanol-water log P predictions in SAMPL6, likely due to a more diverse dataset. Compared to the SAMPL6 pK(a) challenge, accuracy remains unchanged in SAMPL7. Interestingly, here, though macroscopic pK(a) values were often predicted with reasonable accuracy, there was dramatically more disagreement among participants as to which microscopic transitions produced these values (with methods often disagreeing even as to the sign of the free energy change associated with certain transitions), indicating far more work needs to be done on pK(a) prediction methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10822-021-00397-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8224998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82249982021-06-25 Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge Bergazin, Teresa Danielle Tielker, Nicolas Zhang, Yingying Mao, Junjun Gunner, M. R. Francisco, Karol Ballatore, Carlo Kast, Stefan M. Mobley, David L. J Comput Aided Mol Des Article The Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) challenges focuses the computational modeling community on areas in need of improvement for rational drug design. The SAMPL7 physical property challenge dealt with prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients and pK(a) for 22 compounds. The dataset was composed of a series of N-acylsulfonamides and related bioisosteres. 17 research groups participated in the log P challenge, submitting 33 blind submissions total. For the pK(a) challenge, 7 different groups participated, submitting 9 blind submissions in total. Overall, the accuracy of octanol-water log P predictions in the SAMPL7 challenge was lower than octanol-water log P predictions in SAMPL6, likely due to a more diverse dataset. Compared to the SAMPL6 pK(a) challenge, accuracy remains unchanged in SAMPL7. Interestingly, here, though macroscopic pK(a) values were often predicted with reasonable accuracy, there was dramatically more disagreement among participants as to which microscopic transitions produced these values (with methods often disagreeing even as to the sign of the free energy change associated with certain transitions), indicating far more work needs to be done on pK(a) prediction methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10822-021-00397-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8224998/ /pubmed/34169394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-021-00397-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bergazin, Teresa Danielle
Tielker, Nicolas
Zhang, Yingying
Mao, Junjun
Gunner, M. R.
Francisco, Karol
Ballatore, Carlo
Kast, Stefan M.
Mobley, David L.
Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge
title Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge
title_full Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge
title_fullStr Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge
title_short Evaluation of log P, pK(a), and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge
title_sort evaluation of log p, pk(a), and log d predictions from the sampl7 blind challenge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8224998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-021-00397-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bergazinteresadanielle evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT tielkernicolas evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT zhangyingying evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT maojunjun evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT gunnermr evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT franciscokarol evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT ballatorecarlo evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT kaststefanm evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge
AT mobleydavidl evaluationoflogppkaandlogdpredictionsfromthesampl7blindchallenge