Cargando…

Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients

Oral appliances (OAs) of various types have shown variable success in the treatment of mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In an OSA sample, this study evaluated the efficacy of a diagnostic trial OA (myTAP™); the efficacy of a definitive custom-fitted mandibular advancement device (MAD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Segù, Marzia, Cosi, Alessia, Santagostini, Antonio, Scribante, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811700
_version_ 1783712086161883136
author Segù, Marzia
Cosi, Alessia
Santagostini, Antonio
Scribante, Andrea
author_facet Segù, Marzia
Cosi, Alessia
Santagostini, Antonio
Scribante, Andrea
author_sort Segù, Marzia
collection PubMed
description Oral appliances (OAs) of various types have shown variable success in the treatment of mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In an OSA sample, this study evaluated the efficacy of a diagnostic trial OA (myTAP™); the efficacy of a definitive custom-fitted mandibular advancement device (MAD) (SomnoDent Flex™); and whether a trial device can be used to distinguish treatment responder from nonresponder patients. Patients underwent overnight home sleep recordings prior to and after fitting of these appliances in order to objectively assess their sleep quality in terms of polysomnographic (PSG) respiratory measures: apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and minimum oxygen saturation (LowSpO(2)). 40 patients with symptomatic OSAS were enrolled, 33 males and 7 females, with a mean age of 55.6 ± 12.73 years and an initial (T0) AHI of 26.51 ± 14.79. Trial devices were used in 16 patients (AHI: 29.9 ± 19.97, ODI: 21.06 ± 16.05, and LowSpO(2): 82 ± 10.22 at T0) and definitive MADs in 28 (AHI: 23.90 ± 9.19, ODI: 16.27 ± 11.34, and LowSpO(2): 82.87 ± 6.04 at T0). Statistically significant decreases in AHI (9.59 ± 8.94, p < 0.0023) and ODI (8.20 ± 9.67, p < 0.0129) were observed after treatment with the trial device. Only 8 of the patients in the trial device group went on to use the definitive device. Treatment with the definitive MAD produced statistically significant decreases in AHI (11.46 ± 9.65, p < 0.0001) and ODI (9.10 ± 8.47, p < 0.0016) and a significant improvement in LowSpO(2) (85.09 ± 6.86, p < 0.0004). Thus, both types of device proved effective in improving the PSG parameters. This study showed that introducing an easy-to-make and low-cost trial device into the therapeutic pathway of OSAS patients can circumvent the problem of individual responses to treatment by allowing effective classification of patients: in short, it allows a first distinction to be drawn between responders and nonresponders to treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8225417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82254172021-07-02 Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients Segù, Marzia Cosi, Alessia Santagostini, Antonio Scribante, Andrea Int J Dent Research Article Oral appliances (OAs) of various types have shown variable success in the treatment of mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In an OSA sample, this study evaluated the efficacy of a diagnostic trial OA (myTAP™); the efficacy of a definitive custom-fitted mandibular advancement device (MAD) (SomnoDent Flex™); and whether a trial device can be used to distinguish treatment responder from nonresponder patients. Patients underwent overnight home sleep recordings prior to and after fitting of these appliances in order to objectively assess their sleep quality in terms of polysomnographic (PSG) respiratory measures: apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and minimum oxygen saturation (LowSpO(2)). 40 patients with symptomatic OSAS were enrolled, 33 males and 7 females, with a mean age of 55.6 ± 12.73 years and an initial (T0) AHI of 26.51 ± 14.79. Trial devices were used in 16 patients (AHI: 29.9 ± 19.97, ODI: 21.06 ± 16.05, and LowSpO(2): 82 ± 10.22 at T0) and definitive MADs in 28 (AHI: 23.90 ± 9.19, ODI: 16.27 ± 11.34, and LowSpO(2): 82.87 ± 6.04 at T0). Statistically significant decreases in AHI (9.59 ± 8.94, p < 0.0023) and ODI (8.20 ± 9.67, p < 0.0129) were observed after treatment with the trial device. Only 8 of the patients in the trial device group went on to use the definitive device. Treatment with the definitive MAD produced statistically significant decreases in AHI (11.46 ± 9.65, p < 0.0001) and ODI (9.10 ± 8.47, p < 0.0016) and a significant improvement in LowSpO(2) (85.09 ± 6.86, p < 0.0004). Thus, both types of device proved effective in improving the PSG parameters. This study showed that introducing an easy-to-make and low-cost trial device into the therapeutic pathway of OSAS patients can circumvent the problem of individual responses to treatment by allowing effective classification of patients: in short, it allows a first distinction to be drawn between responders and nonresponders to treatment. Hindawi 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8225417/ /pubmed/34221017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811700 Text en Copyright © 2021 Marzia Segù et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Segù, Marzia
Cosi, Alessia
Santagostini, Antonio
Scribante, Andrea
Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients
title Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients
title_full Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients
title_fullStr Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients
title_short Efficacy of a Trial Oral Appliance in OSAS Management: A New Protocol to Recognize Responder/Nonresponder Patients
title_sort efficacy of a trial oral appliance in osas management: a new protocol to recognize responder/nonresponder patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34221017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811700
work_keys_str_mv AT segumarzia efficacyofatrialoralapplianceinosasmanagementanewprotocoltorecognizerespondernonresponderpatients
AT cosialessia efficacyofatrialoralapplianceinosasmanagementanewprotocoltorecognizerespondernonresponderpatients
AT santagostiniantonio efficacyofatrialoralapplianceinosasmanagementanewprotocoltorecognizerespondernonresponderpatients
AT scribanteandrea efficacyofatrialoralapplianceinosasmanagementanewprotocoltorecognizerespondernonresponderpatients