Cargando…

Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms

The use of oral fluid (OF) to detect zoonotic pathogens in pigs has been only scarcely assessed. We evaluated OF as a potential specimen for detection by culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Yersinia enterocolitica, and the detection of antibodies against Salmonella spp....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schott, Franziska, Hoffmann, Karolin, Sarno, Eleonora, Bangerter, Patrick D., Stephan, Roger, Overesch, Gudrun, Haessig, Michael, Sidler, Xaver, Graage, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387211021599
_version_ 1783712134113263616
author Schott, Franziska
Hoffmann, Karolin
Sarno, Eleonora
Bangerter, Patrick D.
Stephan, Roger
Overesch, Gudrun
Haessig, Michael
Sidler, Xaver
Graage, Robert
author_facet Schott, Franziska
Hoffmann, Karolin
Sarno, Eleonora
Bangerter, Patrick D.
Stephan, Roger
Overesch, Gudrun
Haessig, Michael
Sidler, Xaver
Graage, Robert
author_sort Schott, Franziska
collection PubMed
description The use of oral fluid (OF) to detect zoonotic pathogens in pigs has been only scarcely assessed. We evaluated OF as a potential specimen for detection by culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Yersinia enterocolitica, and the detection of antibodies against Salmonella spp. and hepatitis E virus (HEV) using commercial ELISAs. Samples from 33 pig farms were collected at the beginning and end of the fattening period. Results of the OF samples were compared with the results of serum samples and nasal swabs from individual pigs and pen floor fecal samples, using the Cohen kappa (κ) and the McNemar test. For Salmonella spp. antibodies, OF samples were negative, although the corresponding serum samples were positive. The detection of HEV antibodies in sera and OF had agreement at the first sampling, and poor and significant agreement at the second sampling (κ = 0.185, McNemar p = 0.238; κ = 0.088, McNemar p < 0.001). At both sampling times, the detection of MRSA in nasal swabs and OF showed agreement (κ = 0.466, McNemar p = 0.077; κ = 0.603, McNemar p = 1); agreement was seen for the detection of Y. enterocolitica in fecal and OF samples (κ = 0.012, McNemar p = 0.868; κ = 0.082, McNemar p = 0.061, respectively). According to the McNemar test, the use of pen-based OFs is more feasible for the detection of MRSA and Y. enterocolitica by culture than is detection of antibodies by commercial ELISA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8225685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82256852021-07-01 Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms Schott, Franziska Hoffmann, Karolin Sarno, Eleonora Bangerter, Patrick D. Stephan, Roger Overesch, Gudrun Haessig, Michael Sidler, Xaver Graage, Robert J Vet Diagn Invest Full Scientific Reports The use of oral fluid (OF) to detect zoonotic pathogens in pigs has been only scarcely assessed. We evaluated OF as a potential specimen for detection by culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Yersinia enterocolitica, and the detection of antibodies against Salmonella spp. and hepatitis E virus (HEV) using commercial ELISAs. Samples from 33 pig farms were collected at the beginning and end of the fattening period. Results of the OF samples were compared with the results of serum samples and nasal swabs from individual pigs and pen floor fecal samples, using the Cohen kappa (κ) and the McNemar test. For Salmonella spp. antibodies, OF samples were negative, although the corresponding serum samples were positive. The detection of HEV antibodies in sera and OF had agreement at the first sampling, and poor and significant agreement at the second sampling (κ = 0.185, McNemar p = 0.238; κ = 0.088, McNemar p < 0.001). At both sampling times, the detection of MRSA in nasal swabs and OF showed agreement (κ = 0.466, McNemar p = 0.077; κ = 0.603, McNemar p = 1); agreement was seen for the detection of Y. enterocolitica in fecal and OF samples (κ = 0.012, McNemar p = 0.868; κ = 0.082, McNemar p = 0.061, respectively). According to the McNemar test, the use of pen-based OFs is more feasible for the detection of MRSA and Y. enterocolitica by culture than is detection of antibodies by commercial ELISA. SAGE Publications 2021-06-02 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8225685/ /pubmed/34075814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387211021599 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Full Scientific Reports
Schott, Franziska
Hoffmann, Karolin
Sarno, Eleonora
Bangerter, Patrick D.
Stephan, Roger
Overesch, Gudrun
Haessig, Michael
Sidler, Xaver
Graage, Robert
Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
title Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
title_full Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
title_fullStr Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
title_short Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
title_sort evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
topic Full Scientific Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387211021599
work_keys_str_mv AT schottfranziska evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT hoffmannkarolin evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT sarnoeleonora evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT bangerterpatrickd evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT stephanroger evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT overeschgudrun evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT haessigmichael evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT sidlerxaver evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms
AT graagerobert evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms