Cargando…
Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms
The use of oral fluid (OF) to detect zoonotic pathogens in pigs has been only scarcely assessed. We evaluated OF as a potential specimen for detection by culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Yersinia enterocolitica, and the detection of antibodies against Salmonella spp....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387211021599 |
_version_ | 1783712134113263616 |
---|---|
author | Schott, Franziska Hoffmann, Karolin Sarno, Eleonora Bangerter, Patrick D. Stephan, Roger Overesch, Gudrun Haessig, Michael Sidler, Xaver Graage, Robert |
author_facet | Schott, Franziska Hoffmann, Karolin Sarno, Eleonora Bangerter, Patrick D. Stephan, Roger Overesch, Gudrun Haessig, Michael Sidler, Xaver Graage, Robert |
author_sort | Schott, Franziska |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of oral fluid (OF) to detect zoonotic pathogens in pigs has been only scarcely assessed. We evaluated OF as a potential specimen for detection by culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Yersinia enterocolitica, and the detection of antibodies against Salmonella spp. and hepatitis E virus (HEV) using commercial ELISAs. Samples from 33 pig farms were collected at the beginning and end of the fattening period. Results of the OF samples were compared with the results of serum samples and nasal swabs from individual pigs and pen floor fecal samples, using the Cohen kappa (κ) and the McNemar test. For Salmonella spp. antibodies, OF samples were negative, although the corresponding serum samples were positive. The detection of HEV antibodies in sera and OF had agreement at the first sampling, and poor and significant agreement at the second sampling (κ = 0.185, McNemar p = 0.238; κ = 0.088, McNemar p < 0.001). At both sampling times, the detection of MRSA in nasal swabs and OF showed agreement (κ = 0.466, McNemar p = 0.077; κ = 0.603, McNemar p = 1); agreement was seen for the detection of Y. enterocolitica in fecal and OF samples (κ = 0.012, McNemar p = 0.868; κ = 0.082, McNemar p = 0.061, respectively). According to the McNemar test, the use of pen-based OFs is more feasible for the detection of MRSA and Y. enterocolitica by culture than is detection of antibodies by commercial ELISA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8225685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82256852021-07-01 Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms Schott, Franziska Hoffmann, Karolin Sarno, Eleonora Bangerter, Patrick D. Stephan, Roger Overesch, Gudrun Haessig, Michael Sidler, Xaver Graage, Robert J Vet Diagn Invest Full Scientific Reports The use of oral fluid (OF) to detect zoonotic pathogens in pigs has been only scarcely assessed. We evaluated OF as a potential specimen for detection by culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Yersinia enterocolitica, and the detection of antibodies against Salmonella spp. and hepatitis E virus (HEV) using commercial ELISAs. Samples from 33 pig farms were collected at the beginning and end of the fattening period. Results of the OF samples were compared with the results of serum samples and nasal swabs from individual pigs and pen floor fecal samples, using the Cohen kappa (κ) and the McNemar test. For Salmonella spp. antibodies, OF samples were negative, although the corresponding serum samples were positive. The detection of HEV antibodies in sera and OF had agreement at the first sampling, and poor and significant agreement at the second sampling (κ = 0.185, McNemar p = 0.238; κ = 0.088, McNemar p < 0.001). At both sampling times, the detection of MRSA in nasal swabs and OF showed agreement (κ = 0.466, McNemar p = 0.077; κ = 0.603, McNemar p = 1); agreement was seen for the detection of Y. enterocolitica in fecal and OF samples (κ = 0.012, McNemar p = 0.868; κ = 0.082, McNemar p = 0.061, respectively). According to the McNemar test, the use of pen-based OFs is more feasible for the detection of MRSA and Y. enterocolitica by culture than is detection of antibodies by commercial ELISA. SAGE Publications 2021-06-02 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8225685/ /pubmed/34075814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387211021599 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Full Scientific Reports Schott, Franziska Hoffmann, Karolin Sarno, Eleonora Bangerter, Patrick D. Stephan, Roger Overesch, Gudrun Haessig, Michael Sidler, Xaver Graage, Robert Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic pathogens in pig farms |
title | Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic
pathogens in pig farms |
title_full | Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic
pathogens in pig farms |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic
pathogens in pig farms |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic
pathogens in pig farms |
title_short | Evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic
pathogens in pig farms |
title_sort | evaluation of oral fluids for surveillance of foodborne and zoonotic
pathogens in pig farms |
topic | Full Scientific Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34075814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387211021599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schottfranziska evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT hoffmannkarolin evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT sarnoeleonora evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT bangerterpatrickd evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT stephanroger evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT overeschgudrun evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT haessigmichael evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT sidlerxaver evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms AT graagerobert evaluationoforalfluidsforsurveillanceoffoodborneandzoonoticpathogensinpigfarms |