Cargando…
The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members
OBJECTIVE: To survey the opinion of British Orthodontic Society members on the Journal of Orthodontics. DESIGN: Data collection involved an anonymous cross-sectional online SurveyMonkey™ questionnaire. METHODS: An email invitation to complete the survey was sent to the 1842 members of the British Or...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465312520988549 |
_version_ | 1783712136320516096 |
---|---|
author | Jennings, Rosalind Seehra, Jadbinder Cobourne, Martyn T |
author_facet | Jennings, Rosalind Seehra, Jadbinder Cobourne, Martyn T |
author_sort | Jennings, Rosalind |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To survey the opinion of British Orthodontic Society members on the Journal of Orthodontics. DESIGN: Data collection involved an anonymous cross-sectional online SurveyMonkey™ questionnaire. METHODS: An email invitation to complete the survey was sent to the 1842 members of the British Orthodontic Society on 9 June 2020 with a follow-up reminder on 15 July 2020. The invitation contained a brief description and online link to the questionnaire, which was active between 9 June and 9 August 2020. The 15-item questionnaire covered frequency of reading, preferred format, likes and dislikes, and what changes might improve the Journal. Data were analysed for the membership as a whole using simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 310 individuals completed the questionnaire, representing a response rate of 17% with 74.2% (n = 230) reporting reading at least one article per issue. The most popular way of reading the Journal (77.4%, n = 240) was through the distributed print copy. Overall, 63.6% (n=197) rated the Journal as excellent and 35.2% (n = 109) as satisfactory, with only 1.3% (n = 4) responding that it was poor. The scientific and clinical articles were the most popular aspect of the Journal and 90.3% (n = 280) of respondents felt the Journal content was relevant to their current clinical practice. Respondents were also given the opportunity to make additional free-text comments; and themes that emerged included a wish for more clinical content, more online interaction with authors through webinars and continued professional development. CONCLUSION: The Journal of Orthodontics is perceived as being relevant to current clinical practice by members of the British Orthodontic Society and has high-level satisfaction. There is a desire for more online interaction with the membership as part of its role within the society. However, the overall response rate was low and therefore a high risk of potential bias associated with this survey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8225694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82256942021-07-01 The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members Jennings, Rosalind Seehra, Jadbinder Cobourne, Martyn T J Orthod Scientific Section OBJECTIVE: To survey the opinion of British Orthodontic Society members on the Journal of Orthodontics. DESIGN: Data collection involved an anonymous cross-sectional online SurveyMonkey™ questionnaire. METHODS: An email invitation to complete the survey was sent to the 1842 members of the British Orthodontic Society on 9 June 2020 with a follow-up reminder on 15 July 2020. The invitation contained a brief description and online link to the questionnaire, which was active between 9 June and 9 August 2020. The 15-item questionnaire covered frequency of reading, preferred format, likes and dislikes, and what changes might improve the Journal. Data were analysed for the membership as a whole using simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 310 individuals completed the questionnaire, representing a response rate of 17% with 74.2% (n = 230) reporting reading at least one article per issue. The most popular way of reading the Journal (77.4%, n = 240) was through the distributed print copy. Overall, 63.6% (n=197) rated the Journal as excellent and 35.2% (n = 109) as satisfactory, with only 1.3% (n = 4) responding that it was poor. The scientific and clinical articles were the most popular aspect of the Journal and 90.3% (n = 280) of respondents felt the Journal content was relevant to their current clinical practice. Respondents were also given the opportunity to make additional free-text comments; and themes that emerged included a wish for more clinical content, more online interaction with authors through webinars and continued professional development. CONCLUSION: The Journal of Orthodontics is perceived as being relevant to current clinical practice by members of the British Orthodontic Society and has high-level satisfaction. There is a desire for more online interaction with the membership as part of its role within the society. However, the overall response rate was low and therefore a high risk of potential bias associated with this survey. SAGE Publications 2021-02-05 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8225694/ /pubmed/33546573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465312520988549 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Section Jennings, Rosalind Seehra, Jadbinder Cobourne, Martyn T The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members |
title | The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members |
title_full | The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members |
title_fullStr | The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members |
title_full_unstemmed | The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members |
title_short | The Journal of Orthodontics: A cross-sectional survey of British Orthodontic Society members |
title_sort | journal of orthodontics: a cross-sectional survey of british orthodontic society members |
topic | Scientific Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465312520988549 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenningsrosalind thejournaloforthodonticsacrosssectionalsurveyofbritishorthodonticsocietymembers AT seehrajadbinder thejournaloforthodonticsacrosssectionalsurveyofbritishorthodonticsocietymembers AT cobournemartynt thejournaloforthodonticsacrosssectionalsurveyofbritishorthodonticsocietymembers AT jenningsrosalind journaloforthodonticsacrosssectionalsurveyofbritishorthodonticsocietymembers AT seehrajadbinder journaloforthodonticsacrosssectionalsurveyofbritishorthodonticsocietymembers AT cobournemartynt journaloforthodonticsacrosssectionalsurveyofbritishorthodonticsocietymembers |