Cargando…

Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization

The global dissemination of COVID-19 creates confusion and ambiguity in nearly every aspect of life, including fear of contagion, heightened awareness of the mortality of self and family members, lack of power, and distrust of experts and decision-makers. In this stressful situation, the question ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shalev, Idit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177640
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.631758
_version_ 1783712193783529472
author Shalev, Idit
author_facet Shalev, Idit
author_sort Shalev, Idit
collection PubMed
description The global dissemination of COVID-19 creates confusion and ambiguity in nearly every aspect of life, including fear of contagion, heightened awareness of the mortality of self and family members, lack of power, and distrust of experts and decision-makers. In this stressful situation, the question arises as to what mechanisms distinguish between adaptive and maladaptive self-regulation. The theory of Motivated Cue-Integration (MCI) is a novel theory of self-regulation that provides a new perspective on the effect of COVID-19 on self-regulation deficiency as an example of psychological distress. Inspired by predictive coding, social cognition, embodied cognition, and experiential approach, MCI suggests that self-regulation is based on interaction between (1) high-level values and goals, (2) low-level interoceptive and exteroceptive signals, and (3) trust in epistemic authority or a significant other. Motivated Cue-Integration posits that individuals create meaning by making moment-to-moment predictions that affect their interpretation of the experience of ambiguity influenced by their relationship with epistemic authority. According to MCI, deficiency in self-regulation during COVID-19 could result either from over-sensitivity or under-sensitivity to low-level interoceptive and exteroceptive cues; rigidity or ambiguity of high-level goals, poor integration between the two levels of processing as well as distrust in epistemic authority. According to MCI, variations of these deficiencies may occur in various clinical phenomena such as alexithymia and somatization, as well as in social phenomena such as goal radicalization. Based on this reasoning, MCI claims that the mentalization of the relationship between interoceptive cues, exteroceptive cues, goals, and psychological needs of the person, as well as the improvement of confidence in epistemic authority, can promote adaptive self-regulation. Psychological intervention can foster trust in epistemic authority, increase the mentalization of interoceptive and exteroceptive cues, and their association with adaptive goals. As such, the integration of these elements in a way that facilitates incentives pathways and insight fosters a more integrated subjective experience, higher clarity of emotion, and positive internal dialogue which promotes action tendency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8226015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82260152021-06-26 Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization Shalev, Idit Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The global dissemination of COVID-19 creates confusion and ambiguity in nearly every aspect of life, including fear of contagion, heightened awareness of the mortality of self and family members, lack of power, and distrust of experts and decision-makers. In this stressful situation, the question arises as to what mechanisms distinguish between adaptive and maladaptive self-regulation. The theory of Motivated Cue-Integration (MCI) is a novel theory of self-regulation that provides a new perspective on the effect of COVID-19 on self-regulation deficiency as an example of psychological distress. Inspired by predictive coding, social cognition, embodied cognition, and experiential approach, MCI suggests that self-regulation is based on interaction between (1) high-level values and goals, (2) low-level interoceptive and exteroceptive signals, and (3) trust in epistemic authority or a significant other. Motivated Cue-Integration posits that individuals create meaning by making moment-to-moment predictions that affect their interpretation of the experience of ambiguity influenced by their relationship with epistemic authority. According to MCI, deficiency in self-regulation during COVID-19 could result either from over-sensitivity or under-sensitivity to low-level interoceptive and exteroceptive cues; rigidity or ambiguity of high-level goals, poor integration between the two levels of processing as well as distrust in epistemic authority. According to MCI, variations of these deficiencies may occur in various clinical phenomena such as alexithymia and somatization, as well as in social phenomena such as goal radicalization. Based on this reasoning, MCI claims that the mentalization of the relationship between interoceptive cues, exteroceptive cues, goals, and psychological needs of the person, as well as the improvement of confidence in epistemic authority, can promote adaptive self-regulation. Psychological intervention can foster trust in epistemic authority, increase the mentalization of interoceptive and exteroceptive cues, and their association with adaptive goals. As such, the integration of these elements in a way that facilitates incentives pathways and insight fosters a more integrated subjective experience, higher clarity of emotion, and positive internal dialogue which promotes action tendency. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8226015/ /pubmed/34177640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.631758 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shalev. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Shalev, Idit
Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization
title Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization
title_full Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization
title_fullStr Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization
title_full_unstemmed Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization
title_short Theory of Motivated Cue-Integration and COVID-19: Between Interoception, Somatization, and Radicalization
title_sort theory of motivated cue-integration and covid-19: between interoception, somatization, and radicalization
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34177640
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.631758
work_keys_str_mv AT shalevidit theoryofmotivatedcueintegrationandcovid19betweeninteroceptionsomatizationandradicalization