Cargando…
Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of incidental findings (IFs) identified in patients undergoing chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study 232 patients were triaged in our COVID-19 Screening Unit by means of a chest CT (March 25–April 23, 2020). Original...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100366 |
_version_ | 1783712204493684736 |
---|---|
author | Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Roos, Marlise P. Bresser, Paul Reesink, Herre J. Peringa, Jan |
author_facet | Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Roos, Marlise P. Bresser, Paul Reesink, Herre J. Peringa, Jan |
author_sort | Kilsdonk, Iris D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of incidental findings (IFs) identified in patients undergoing chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study 232 patients were triaged in our COVID-19 Screening Unit by means of a chest CT (March 25–April 23, 2020). Original radiology reports were evaluated retrospectively for the description of IFs, which were defined as any finding in the report not related to the purpose of the scan. Documented IFs were categorized according to clinical relevance into minor and potentially significant IFs and according to anatomical location into pulmonary, mediastinal, cardiovascular, breast, upper abdominal and skeletal categories. IFs were reported as frequencies and percentages; descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: In total 197 IFs were detected in 126 patients (54 % of the participants). Patients with IFs were on average older (54.0 years old, SD 16.6) than patients without IFs (44.8 years old, SD 14.6, P < 0.05). In total 60 potentially significant IFs were detected in 53 patients (23 % of the participants). Most often reported were coronary artery calcifications (n = 23, 38 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 10 % of the total study population), suspicious breast nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population) and pulmonary nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population). CONCLUSION: A considerable number of IFs were detected by using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19, of which a substantial percentage (23 %) is potentially clinically relevant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8226060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82260602021-06-25 Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Roos, Marlise P. Bresser, Paul Reesink, Herre J. Peringa, Jan Eur J Radiol Open Article PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of incidental findings (IFs) identified in patients undergoing chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study 232 patients were triaged in our COVID-19 Screening Unit by means of a chest CT (March 25–April 23, 2020). Original radiology reports were evaluated retrospectively for the description of IFs, which were defined as any finding in the report not related to the purpose of the scan. Documented IFs were categorized according to clinical relevance into minor and potentially significant IFs and according to anatomical location into pulmonary, mediastinal, cardiovascular, breast, upper abdominal and skeletal categories. IFs were reported as frequencies and percentages; descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: In total 197 IFs were detected in 126 patients (54 % of the participants). Patients with IFs were on average older (54.0 years old, SD 16.6) than patients without IFs (44.8 years old, SD 14.6, P < 0.05). In total 60 potentially significant IFs were detected in 53 patients (23 % of the participants). Most often reported were coronary artery calcifications (n = 23, 38 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 10 % of the total study population), suspicious breast nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population) and pulmonary nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population). CONCLUSION: A considerable number of IFs were detected by using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19, of which a substantial percentage (23 %) is potentially clinically relevant. Elsevier 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8226060/ /pubmed/34189189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100366 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Roos, Marlise P. Bresser, Paul Reesink, Herre J. Peringa, Jan Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 |
title | Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 |
title_full | Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 |
title_short | Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 |
title_sort | frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest ct as a primary triage tool for covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kilsdonkirisd frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19 AT deroosmarlisep frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19 AT bresserpaul frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19 AT reesinkherrej frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19 AT peringajan frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19 |