Cargando…

Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of incidental findings (IFs) identified in patients undergoing chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study 232 patients were triaged in our COVID-19 Screening Unit by means of a chest CT (March 25–April 23, 2020). Original...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilsdonk, Iris D., de Roos, Marlise P., Bresser, Paul, Reesink, Herre J., Peringa, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100366
_version_ 1783712204493684736
author Kilsdonk, Iris D.
de Roos, Marlise P.
Bresser, Paul
Reesink, Herre J.
Peringa, Jan
author_facet Kilsdonk, Iris D.
de Roos, Marlise P.
Bresser, Paul
Reesink, Herre J.
Peringa, Jan
author_sort Kilsdonk, Iris D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of incidental findings (IFs) identified in patients undergoing chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study 232 patients were triaged in our COVID-19 Screening Unit by means of a chest CT (March 25–April 23, 2020). Original radiology reports were evaluated retrospectively for the description of IFs, which were defined as any finding in the report not related to the purpose of the scan. Documented IFs were categorized according to clinical relevance into minor and potentially significant IFs and according to anatomical location into pulmonary, mediastinal, cardiovascular, breast, upper abdominal and skeletal categories. IFs were reported as frequencies and percentages; descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: In total 197 IFs were detected in 126 patients (54 % of the participants). Patients with IFs were on average older (54.0 years old, SD 16.6) than patients without IFs (44.8 years old, SD 14.6, P < 0.05). In total 60 potentially significant IFs were detected in 53 patients (23 % of the participants). Most often reported were coronary artery calcifications (n = 23, 38 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 10 % of the total study population), suspicious breast nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population) and pulmonary nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population). CONCLUSION: A considerable number of IFs were detected by using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19, of which a substantial percentage (23 %) is potentially clinically relevant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8226060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82260602021-06-25 Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19 Kilsdonk, Iris D. de Roos, Marlise P. Bresser, Paul Reesink, Herre J. Peringa, Jan Eur J Radiol Open Article PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of incidental findings (IFs) identified in patients undergoing chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study 232 patients were triaged in our COVID-19 Screening Unit by means of a chest CT (March 25–April 23, 2020). Original radiology reports were evaluated retrospectively for the description of IFs, which were defined as any finding in the report not related to the purpose of the scan. Documented IFs were categorized according to clinical relevance into minor and potentially significant IFs and according to anatomical location into pulmonary, mediastinal, cardiovascular, breast, upper abdominal and skeletal categories. IFs were reported as frequencies and percentages; descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: In total 197 IFs were detected in 126 patients (54 % of the participants). Patients with IFs were on average older (54.0 years old, SD 16.6) than patients without IFs (44.8 years old, SD 14.6, P < 0.05). In total 60 potentially significant IFs were detected in 53 patients (23 % of the participants). Most often reported were coronary artery calcifications (n = 23, 38 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 10 % of the total study population), suspicious breast nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population) and pulmonary nodules (n = 7, 12 % of total potentially significant IFs/ 3% of the total study population). CONCLUSION: A considerable number of IFs were detected by using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19, of which a substantial percentage (23 %) is potentially clinically relevant. Elsevier 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8226060/ /pubmed/34189189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100366 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kilsdonk, Iris D.
de Roos, Marlise P.
Bresser, Paul
Reesink, Herre J.
Peringa, Jan
Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
title Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
title_full Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
title_fullStr Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
title_short Frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest CT as a primary triage tool for COVID-19
title_sort frequency and spectrum of incidental findings when using chest ct as a primary triage tool for covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34189189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100366
work_keys_str_mv AT kilsdonkirisd frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19
AT deroosmarlisep frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19
AT bresserpaul frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19
AT reesinkherrej frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19
AT peringajan frequencyandspectrumofincidentalfindingswhenusingchestctasaprimarytriagetoolforcovid19