Cargando…

Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan

IMPORTANCE: There are different clinical practices regarding ultrasonography screening intervals for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) despite recommendations from international guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether ultrasonography screening using intervals suggested by international guidelines is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuo, Shih-Chiang, Lin, Chia-Ni, Lin, Yih-Jyh, Chen, Wei-Ying, Hwang, Jing-Shiang, Wang, Jung-Der
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14680
_version_ 1783712285517152256
author Kuo, Shih-Chiang
Lin, Chia-Ni
Lin, Yih-Jyh
Chen, Wei-Ying
Hwang, Jing-Shiang
Wang, Jung-Der
author_facet Kuo, Shih-Chiang
Lin, Chia-Ni
Lin, Yih-Jyh
Chen, Wei-Ying
Hwang, Jing-Shiang
Wang, Jung-Der
author_sort Kuo, Shih-Chiang
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: There are different clinical practices regarding ultrasonography screening intervals for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) despite recommendations from international guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether ultrasonography screening using intervals suggested by international guidelines is associated with cancer stage shifting, reductions in mortality, and improved quality of life (QoL) for patients with HCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide comparative effectiveness research study estimated lifetime survival functions using interlinkages of 3 databases from Taiwan—the Taiwan National Health Insurance, Taiwan National Cancer Registry, and National Mortality Registry—combined with QoL measurements obtained from National Cheng Kung University Hospital. In total, 114 022 patients listed as having newly diagnosed HCC from 2002 through 2015 in the Taiwan National Cancer Registry were followed up until 2017. The QoL values of 1059 patients with HCC who visited National Cheng Kung University Hospital were prospectively measured with the European QoL-5 dimensions questionnaire from 2011 through 2019. Patients were categorized based on the time between their last ultrasonography screening and the index date (90 days prior to HCC diagnosis) as 1 of 5 subcohorts: 6 months (0-6 months), 12 months (7-12 months), 24 months (13-24 months), 36 months (25-36 months), and longer than 36 months (no screening in the previous 3 years). Data were analyzed from April 2020 to April 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and loss of life expectancy or loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with age-, sex-, and calendar year–matched cohorts. RESULTS: There were 59 194 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging information, including 42 081 men (mean [SD] age, 62.2 [12.6] years) and 17 113 women (mean [SD] age, 69.0 [11.2] years). There was a consistent trend showing that the longer the interval between ultrasonography examinations, the higher the loss of life expectancy and loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy for both sexes. Loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy values for male subcohorts were 10.0 (95% CI, 9.1-10.9) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for ultrasonography screening intervals of 6 months, 11.1 (95% CI, 10.4-11.8) QALYs for 12 months, 12.1 (95% CI, 11.5-12.7) QALYs for 24 months, 13.1 (95% CI, 12.6-13.6) QALYs for 36 months, and 14.6 (95% CI, 14.2-15.0) QALYs for longer than 36 months. Loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy values for female subcohorts were 9.0 (95% CI, 8.3-9.6) QALYs for 6 months, 9.7 (95% CI, 9.2-10.2) QALYs for 12 months, 10.3 (95% CI, 9.8-10.7) QALYs for 24 months, 10.7 (95% CI, 10.2-11.1) QALYs for 36 months, and 11.4 (95% CI, 11.0-11.8) QALYs for longer than 36 months. Patients with underlying hepatitis B virus infection or cirrhosis had the greatest improvement in life expectancy with shorter screening intervals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Regular ultrasonography screening with intervals less than 6 to 12 months may be associated with early detection of HCC, save lives, and improve the quality of life for patients with HCC from a lifetime perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8226422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82264222021-07-09 Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan Kuo, Shih-Chiang Lin, Chia-Ni Lin, Yih-Jyh Chen, Wei-Ying Hwang, Jing-Shiang Wang, Jung-Der JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: There are different clinical practices regarding ultrasonography screening intervals for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) despite recommendations from international guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether ultrasonography screening using intervals suggested by international guidelines is associated with cancer stage shifting, reductions in mortality, and improved quality of life (QoL) for patients with HCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide comparative effectiveness research study estimated lifetime survival functions using interlinkages of 3 databases from Taiwan—the Taiwan National Health Insurance, Taiwan National Cancer Registry, and National Mortality Registry—combined with QoL measurements obtained from National Cheng Kung University Hospital. In total, 114 022 patients listed as having newly diagnosed HCC from 2002 through 2015 in the Taiwan National Cancer Registry were followed up until 2017. The QoL values of 1059 patients with HCC who visited National Cheng Kung University Hospital were prospectively measured with the European QoL-5 dimensions questionnaire from 2011 through 2019. Patients were categorized based on the time between their last ultrasonography screening and the index date (90 days prior to HCC diagnosis) as 1 of 5 subcohorts: 6 months (0-6 months), 12 months (7-12 months), 24 months (13-24 months), 36 months (25-36 months), and longer than 36 months (no screening in the previous 3 years). Data were analyzed from April 2020 to April 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and loss of life expectancy or loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with age-, sex-, and calendar year–matched cohorts. RESULTS: There were 59 194 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging information, including 42 081 men (mean [SD] age, 62.2 [12.6] years) and 17 113 women (mean [SD] age, 69.0 [11.2] years). There was a consistent trend showing that the longer the interval between ultrasonography examinations, the higher the loss of life expectancy and loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy for both sexes. Loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy values for male subcohorts were 10.0 (95% CI, 9.1-10.9) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for ultrasonography screening intervals of 6 months, 11.1 (95% CI, 10.4-11.8) QALYs for 12 months, 12.1 (95% CI, 11.5-12.7) QALYs for 24 months, 13.1 (95% CI, 12.6-13.6) QALYs for 36 months, and 14.6 (95% CI, 14.2-15.0) QALYs for longer than 36 months. Loss of quality-adjusted life expectancy values for female subcohorts were 9.0 (95% CI, 8.3-9.6) QALYs for 6 months, 9.7 (95% CI, 9.2-10.2) QALYs for 12 months, 10.3 (95% CI, 9.8-10.7) QALYs for 24 months, 10.7 (95% CI, 10.2-11.1) QALYs for 36 months, and 11.4 (95% CI, 11.0-11.8) QALYs for longer than 36 months. Patients with underlying hepatitis B virus infection or cirrhosis had the greatest improvement in life expectancy with shorter screening intervals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Regular ultrasonography screening with intervals less than 6 to 12 months may be associated with early detection of HCC, save lives, and improve the quality of life for patients with HCC from a lifetime perspective. American Medical Association 2021-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8226422/ /pubmed/34165580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14680 Text en Copyright 2021 Kuo SC et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Kuo, Shih-Chiang
Lin, Chia-Ni
Lin, Yih-Jyh
Chen, Wei-Ying
Hwang, Jing-Shiang
Wang, Jung-Der
Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
title Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
title_full Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
title_fullStr Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
title_short Optimal Intervals of Ultrasonography Screening for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
title_sort optimal intervals of ultrasonography screening for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in taiwan
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14680
work_keys_str_mv AT kuoshihchiang optimalintervalsofultrasonographyscreeningforearlydiagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaintaiwan
AT linchiani optimalintervalsofultrasonographyscreeningforearlydiagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaintaiwan
AT linyihjyh optimalintervalsofultrasonographyscreeningforearlydiagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaintaiwan
AT chenweiying optimalintervalsofultrasonographyscreeningforearlydiagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaintaiwan
AT hwangjingshiang optimalintervalsofultrasonographyscreeningforearlydiagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaintaiwan
AT wangjungder optimalintervalsofultrasonographyscreeningforearlydiagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomaintaiwan