Cargando…

New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment

Analytical biosimilarity assessment relies on two implicit conditions. First, the analytical method must meet a set of requirements known as fit for intended use related to trueness and precision. Second, the manufacture of the reference drug product must be under statistical quality control; i.e.,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliva, Alexis, Llabrés, Matías
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14060527
_version_ 1783712330407739392
author Oliva, Alexis
Llabrés, Matías
author_facet Oliva, Alexis
Llabrés, Matías
author_sort Oliva, Alexis
collection PubMed
description Analytical biosimilarity assessment relies on two implicit conditions. First, the analytical method must meet a set of requirements known as fit for intended use related to trueness and precision. Second, the manufacture of the reference drug product must be under statistical quality control; i.e., the between-batch variability is not larger than the expected within-batch variability. In addition, the quality range (QR) method is based on one sample per batch to avoid biased standard deviations in unbalanced studies. This, together with the small number of reference drug product batches, leads to highly variable QR bounds. In this paper, we propose to set the QR bounds from variance components estimated using a two-level nested linear model, accounting for between- and within-batch variances of the reference drug product. In this way, the standard deviation used to set QR is equal to the square root of the sum of between-batch variance plus the within-batch variance estimated by the maximum likelihood method. The process of this method, which we call QR(ML), is as follows. First, the condition of statistical quality control of the manufacture process is tested. Second, confidence intervals for QR bounds lead to an analysis of the reliability of the biosimilarity assessment. Third, after analyzing the molecular weight and dimer content of seven batches of a commercial bevacizumab drug product, we concluded that the QR(ML) method was more reliable than QR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8226621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82266212021-06-26 New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment Oliva, Alexis Llabrés, Matías Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article Analytical biosimilarity assessment relies on two implicit conditions. First, the analytical method must meet a set of requirements known as fit for intended use related to trueness and precision. Second, the manufacture of the reference drug product must be under statistical quality control; i.e., the between-batch variability is not larger than the expected within-batch variability. In addition, the quality range (QR) method is based on one sample per batch to avoid biased standard deviations in unbalanced studies. This, together with the small number of reference drug product batches, leads to highly variable QR bounds. In this paper, we propose to set the QR bounds from variance components estimated using a two-level nested linear model, accounting for between- and within-batch variances of the reference drug product. In this way, the standard deviation used to set QR is equal to the square root of the sum of between-batch variance plus the within-batch variance estimated by the maximum likelihood method. The process of this method, which we call QR(ML), is as follows. First, the condition of statistical quality control of the manufacture process is tested. Second, confidence intervals for QR bounds lead to an analysis of the reliability of the biosimilarity assessment. Third, after analyzing the molecular weight and dimer content of seven batches of a commercial bevacizumab drug product, we concluded that the QR(ML) method was more reliable than QR. MDPI 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8226621/ /pubmed/34205892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14060527 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Oliva, Alexis
Llabrés, Matías
New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment
title New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment
title_full New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment
title_fullStr New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment
title_full_unstemmed New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment
title_short New Quality-Range-Setting Method Based on Between- and Within-Batch Variability for Biosimilarity Assessment
title_sort new quality-range-setting method based on between- and within-batch variability for biosimilarity assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14060527
work_keys_str_mv AT olivaalexis newqualityrangesettingmethodbasedonbetweenandwithinbatchvariabilityforbiosimilarityassessment
AT llabresmatias newqualityrangesettingmethodbasedonbetweenandwithinbatchvariabilityforbiosimilarityassessment