Cargando…

Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field

Alternatives to the antibiotic fumagillin for the control of Nosema ceranae, a gut parasite of the honey bee, are needed. The prebiotics eugenol, chitosan, and naringenin and the probiotic Protexin(®) (Enterococcus faecium) provided in sugar syrup or protein patty either in spring or fall were evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klassen, Shane S., VanBlyderveen, William, Eccles, Les, Kelly, Paul G., Borges, Daniel, Goodwin, Paul H., Petukhova, Tatiana, Wang, Qiang, Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8060107
_version_ 1783712347340144640
author Klassen, Shane S.
VanBlyderveen, William
Eccles, Les
Kelly, Paul G.
Borges, Daniel
Goodwin, Paul H.
Petukhova, Tatiana
Wang, Qiang
Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto
author_facet Klassen, Shane S.
VanBlyderveen, William
Eccles, Les
Kelly, Paul G.
Borges, Daniel
Goodwin, Paul H.
Petukhova, Tatiana
Wang, Qiang
Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto
author_sort Klassen, Shane S.
collection PubMed
description Alternatives to the antibiotic fumagillin for the control of Nosema ceranae, a gut parasite of the honey bee, are needed. The prebiotics eugenol, chitosan, and naringenin and the probiotic Protexin(®) (Enterococcus faecium) provided in sugar syrup or protein patty either in spring or fall were evaluated for their effects on N. ceranae infection, colony population, honey yield and winter survivorship using field colonies. In the first year, spring treatments with eugenol, naringenin, and Protexin(®) significantly reduced N. ceranae infection and increased honey production, while Protexin(®) also increased adult bee populations and chitosan was ineffective. Fall treatments increased survivorship and decreased N. ceranae infection the following spring. In the second year, selected compounds were further tested with a larger number of colonies per treatment and only protein patty used in the spring and sugar syrup in the fall. Protexin(®) and naringenin significantly decreased N. ceranae infections and increased the population of adult bees after spring treatment, but did not affect honey yields. There were no differences between treatments for colony winter mortality, but surviving colonies that had been treated with Protexin(®) and naringenin were significantly more populated and had lower N. ceranae spore counts than control, non-treated colonies. Protexin(®) and naringenin were the most promising candidates for controlling N. ceranae and promoting honey bee populations, warranting further investigation. Future research should investigate the optimal colony dose and treatment frequency to maximize colony health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8226692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82266922021-06-26 Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field Klassen, Shane S. VanBlyderveen, William Eccles, Les Kelly, Paul G. Borges, Daniel Goodwin, Paul H. Petukhova, Tatiana Wang, Qiang Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto Vet Sci Article Alternatives to the antibiotic fumagillin for the control of Nosema ceranae, a gut parasite of the honey bee, are needed. The prebiotics eugenol, chitosan, and naringenin and the probiotic Protexin(®) (Enterococcus faecium) provided in sugar syrup or protein patty either in spring or fall were evaluated for their effects on N. ceranae infection, colony population, honey yield and winter survivorship using field colonies. In the first year, spring treatments with eugenol, naringenin, and Protexin(®) significantly reduced N. ceranae infection and increased honey production, while Protexin(®) also increased adult bee populations and chitosan was ineffective. Fall treatments increased survivorship and decreased N. ceranae infection the following spring. In the second year, selected compounds were further tested with a larger number of colonies per treatment and only protein patty used in the spring and sugar syrup in the fall. Protexin(®) and naringenin significantly decreased N. ceranae infections and increased the population of adult bees after spring treatment, but did not affect honey yields. There were no differences between treatments for colony winter mortality, but surviving colonies that had been treated with Protexin(®) and naringenin were significantly more populated and had lower N. ceranae spore counts than control, non-treated colonies. Protexin(®) and naringenin were the most promising candidates for controlling N. ceranae and promoting honey bee populations, warranting further investigation. Future research should investigate the optimal colony dose and treatment frequency to maximize colony health. MDPI 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8226692/ /pubmed/34200566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8060107 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Klassen, Shane S.
VanBlyderveen, William
Eccles, Les
Kelly, Paul G.
Borges, Daniel
Goodwin, Paul H.
Petukhova, Tatiana
Wang, Qiang
Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto
Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field
title Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field
title_full Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field
title_fullStr Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field
title_full_unstemmed Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field
title_short Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field
title_sort nosema ceranae infections in honey bees (apis mellifera) treated with pre/probiotics and impacts on colonies in the field
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8060107
work_keys_str_mv AT klassenshanes nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT vanblyderveenwilliam nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT ecclesles nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT kellypaulg nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT borgesdaniel nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT goodwinpaulh nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT petukhovatatiana nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT wangqiang nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield
AT guzmannovoaernesto nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield