Cargando…
Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field
Alternatives to the antibiotic fumagillin for the control of Nosema ceranae, a gut parasite of the honey bee, are needed. The prebiotics eugenol, chitosan, and naringenin and the probiotic Protexin(®) (Enterococcus faecium) provided in sugar syrup or protein patty either in spring or fall were evalu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8060107 |
_version_ | 1783712347340144640 |
---|---|
author | Klassen, Shane S. VanBlyderveen, William Eccles, Les Kelly, Paul G. Borges, Daniel Goodwin, Paul H. Petukhova, Tatiana Wang, Qiang Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto |
author_facet | Klassen, Shane S. VanBlyderveen, William Eccles, Les Kelly, Paul G. Borges, Daniel Goodwin, Paul H. Petukhova, Tatiana Wang, Qiang Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto |
author_sort | Klassen, Shane S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Alternatives to the antibiotic fumagillin for the control of Nosema ceranae, a gut parasite of the honey bee, are needed. The prebiotics eugenol, chitosan, and naringenin and the probiotic Protexin(®) (Enterococcus faecium) provided in sugar syrup or protein patty either in spring or fall were evaluated for their effects on N. ceranae infection, colony population, honey yield and winter survivorship using field colonies. In the first year, spring treatments with eugenol, naringenin, and Protexin(®) significantly reduced N. ceranae infection and increased honey production, while Protexin(®) also increased adult bee populations and chitosan was ineffective. Fall treatments increased survivorship and decreased N. ceranae infection the following spring. In the second year, selected compounds were further tested with a larger number of colonies per treatment and only protein patty used in the spring and sugar syrup in the fall. Protexin(®) and naringenin significantly decreased N. ceranae infections and increased the population of adult bees after spring treatment, but did not affect honey yields. There were no differences between treatments for colony winter mortality, but surviving colonies that had been treated with Protexin(®) and naringenin were significantly more populated and had lower N. ceranae spore counts than control, non-treated colonies. Protexin(®) and naringenin were the most promising candidates for controlling N. ceranae and promoting honey bee populations, warranting further investigation. Future research should investigate the optimal colony dose and treatment frequency to maximize colony health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8226692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82266922021-06-26 Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field Klassen, Shane S. VanBlyderveen, William Eccles, Les Kelly, Paul G. Borges, Daniel Goodwin, Paul H. Petukhova, Tatiana Wang, Qiang Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto Vet Sci Article Alternatives to the antibiotic fumagillin for the control of Nosema ceranae, a gut parasite of the honey bee, are needed. The prebiotics eugenol, chitosan, and naringenin and the probiotic Protexin(®) (Enterococcus faecium) provided in sugar syrup or protein patty either in spring or fall were evaluated for their effects on N. ceranae infection, colony population, honey yield and winter survivorship using field colonies. In the first year, spring treatments with eugenol, naringenin, and Protexin(®) significantly reduced N. ceranae infection and increased honey production, while Protexin(®) also increased adult bee populations and chitosan was ineffective. Fall treatments increased survivorship and decreased N. ceranae infection the following spring. In the second year, selected compounds were further tested with a larger number of colonies per treatment and only protein patty used in the spring and sugar syrup in the fall. Protexin(®) and naringenin significantly decreased N. ceranae infections and increased the population of adult bees after spring treatment, but did not affect honey yields. There were no differences between treatments for colony winter mortality, but surviving colonies that had been treated with Protexin(®) and naringenin were significantly more populated and had lower N. ceranae spore counts than control, non-treated colonies. Protexin(®) and naringenin were the most promising candidates for controlling N. ceranae and promoting honey bee populations, warranting further investigation. Future research should investigate the optimal colony dose and treatment frequency to maximize colony health. MDPI 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8226692/ /pubmed/34200566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8060107 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Klassen, Shane S. VanBlyderveen, William Eccles, Les Kelly, Paul G. Borges, Daniel Goodwin, Paul H. Petukhova, Tatiana Wang, Qiang Guzman-Novoa, Ernesto Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field |
title | Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field |
title_full | Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field |
title_fullStr | Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field |
title_full_unstemmed | Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field |
title_short | Nosema ceranae Infections in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) Treated with Pre/Probiotics and Impacts on Colonies in the Field |
title_sort | nosema ceranae infections in honey bees (apis mellifera) treated with pre/probiotics and impacts on colonies in the field |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34200566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8060107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klassenshanes nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT vanblyderveenwilliam nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT ecclesles nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT kellypaulg nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT borgesdaniel nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT goodwinpaulh nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT petukhovatatiana nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT wangqiang nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield AT guzmannovoaernesto nosemaceranaeinfectionsinhoneybeesapismelliferatreatedwithpreprobioticsandimpactsoncoloniesinthefield |