Cargando…

Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians

Background: In recent years, there has been a shift in the clinical presentation and, hence, diagnostic definitions of eating disorders (EDs), reflected in a dramatic change in the diagnostic criteria of EDs in the DSM-5. The Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) is currently considered an accepted inst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spivak-Lavi, Zohar, Peleg, Ora, Tzischinsky, Orna, Stein, Daniel, Latzer, Yael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13061899
_version_ 1783712406534356992
author Spivak-Lavi, Zohar
Peleg, Ora
Tzischinsky, Orna
Stein, Daniel
Latzer, Yael
author_facet Spivak-Lavi, Zohar
Peleg, Ora
Tzischinsky, Orna
Stein, Daniel
Latzer, Yael
author_sort Spivak-Lavi, Zohar
collection PubMed
description Background: In recent years, there has been a shift in the clinical presentation and, hence, diagnostic definitions of eating disorders (EDs), reflected in a dramatic change in the diagnostic criteria of EDs in the DSM-5. The Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) is currently considered an accepted instrument for community studies of EDs, although it features an inconsistent factorial structure in different cultures. Therefore, it is essential to investigate whether the EAT-26 can still be considered an adequate instrument for identifying the risk of developing EDs in different cultures. The aim of the present study was to examine the construct validity and internal consistency of the EAT-26. Method: The study used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) among different cultural populations in Israel. Results: Findings indicated different factors in different ethnic groups, most of which do not correspond with the original EAT-26 three-factor structure. Results: The analysis yielded two main factors among Israeli Jews, four main factors among Israeli Muslim Arabs, and three main factors among Israeli Christian Arabs. Conclusion: These findings shed light on cultural factors affecting perceptions of the EAT-26 items. This calls for a reconsideration of the generalization of the original three-factor structure of the questionnaire in different cultures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8226938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82269382021-06-26 Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians Spivak-Lavi, Zohar Peleg, Ora Tzischinsky, Orna Stein, Daniel Latzer, Yael Nutrients Article Background: In recent years, there has been a shift in the clinical presentation and, hence, diagnostic definitions of eating disorders (EDs), reflected in a dramatic change in the diagnostic criteria of EDs in the DSM-5. The Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) is currently considered an accepted instrument for community studies of EDs, although it features an inconsistent factorial structure in different cultures. Therefore, it is essential to investigate whether the EAT-26 can still be considered an adequate instrument for identifying the risk of developing EDs in different cultures. The aim of the present study was to examine the construct validity and internal consistency of the EAT-26. Method: The study used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) among different cultural populations in Israel. Results: Findings indicated different factors in different ethnic groups, most of which do not correspond with the original EAT-26 three-factor structure. Results: The analysis yielded two main factors among Israeli Jews, four main factors among Israeli Muslim Arabs, and three main factors among Israeli Christian Arabs. Conclusion: These findings shed light on cultural factors affecting perceptions of the EAT-26 items. This calls for a reconsideration of the generalization of the original three-factor structure of the questionnaire in different cultures. MDPI 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8226938/ /pubmed/34073005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13061899 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Spivak-Lavi, Zohar
Peleg, Ora
Tzischinsky, Orna
Stein, Daniel
Latzer, Yael
Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians
title Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians
title_full Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians
title_fullStr Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians
title_short Differences in the Factor Structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26) in Different Cultures in Israel: Jews, Muslims, and Christians
title_sort differences in the factor structure of the eating attitude test-26 (eat-26) in different cultures in israel: jews, muslims, and christians
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8226938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13061899
work_keys_str_mv AT spivaklavizohar differencesinthefactorstructureoftheeatingattitudetest26eat26indifferentculturesinisraeljewsmuslimsandchristians
AT pelegora differencesinthefactorstructureoftheeatingattitudetest26eat26indifferentculturesinisraeljewsmuslimsandchristians
AT tzischinskyorna differencesinthefactorstructureoftheeatingattitudetest26eat26indifferentculturesinisraeljewsmuslimsandchristians
AT steindaniel differencesinthefactorstructureoftheeatingattitudetest26eat26indifferentculturesinisraeljewsmuslimsandchristians
AT latzeryael differencesinthefactorstructureoftheeatingattitudetest26eat26indifferentculturesinisraeljewsmuslimsandchristians